In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Duke
Tantiprasut" writes:
>Is there any plans to make getMatch() and group() threadsafe?
They are thread-safe. Concurrent calls to multiple methods will not leave
the object in an inconsistent state. What I think you're asking is for
the results to be thread-lo
Both will actually be the same for me. I just use the Perl5Util and dont
explicitly create matchers. The first option sounds like an easier way to go
as well as being easy for most people to understand.
On 3/29/06, Daniel F. Savarese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Hi All,
Below is an interesting benchmark result comparing a number of regex
engines.
http://tusker.org/regex/regex_benchmark.html
I'm curious why there is such a significant jump from the Perl5Matcher
compared to the java.util.regex?
The DFA based engines such as JREXX look really fast but I'm
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Duke
Tantiprasut" writes:
>I'm curious why there is such a significant jump from the Perl5Matcher
>compared to the java.util.regex?
A hefty chunk of that time comes from converting strings to char[] before
matching. I've tuned that benchmark before and trimmed 2
