Experts, Lawmakers Concerned About Nuclear Terrorism,
Aviation Security 

By  Dan Robinson 
VOA NEWS
Capitol Hill
19 April 2005

Experts testifying before Congress say the United
States needs to be more aggressive and organized in
defending against possible nuclear terrorist attacks. 
The testimony on Capitol Hill came as lawmakers
expressed concern about new reports on weaknesses in
aviation security.

Appearing before a House subcommittee, the experts
said that while laudable, steps to strengthen
safeguards against nuclear and biological attacks lack
intensity and organization.

Under legislation approved since the September 11,
2001 al-Qaida terrorist attacks on the United States,
the government has undertaken new efforts to help
reduce the chances of such attacks.

These include a new Domestic Nuclear Deterrence Office
within the Department of Homeland Security, to help
coordinate efforts to prevent the smuggling of nuclear
weapons or materials into the United States.

However, Fred Ikle of the Center for Security and
International Studies says what is needed is nothing
less than a major effort modeled on the Manhattan
Project that developed the U.S. atomic bomb during
WWII.

"What we need is to pull these laboratories together,
like we did for the Manhattan Project initially, like
we did in a different context for the Apollo project,
with one manager [who] can run it with a flexible
budget, and can attract the best people," he said.

A continuing concern is that terrorists might be able
to get a radiological weapon through detection
measures in force at the nation's seaports.  

Congress approved billions of dollars to bolster port
security including sophisticated detection equipment
to scan shipping containers.

But many lawmakers say that is still not enough, and
other witnesses assert such measures may be missing
the point.  

Graham Allison is a former Assistant Secretary of
Defense, now heading the Belfer Center for Science and
International Affairs at Harvard University, and a
critic of what he calls incoherent strategies to
prevent nuclear terrorism.

"We remain a country almost without borders,!( he
said.  !'So, a terrorist who is bringing a nuclear
bomb or material for a bomb into the country is going
to come through a highly protected port, or portal,
where they get inspected?  And if we build a fence
higher, higher and higher, and we have 100 miles with
no fence what happens?  We have actually run this
experiment down by San Diego.  So we have a huge fence
and no one comes through the fence amazingly, but more
people come [across the border] than came before,
because they come around the fence."

Mr. Allison says one of the best defenses against
nuclear terrorism remains to secure or eliminate
nuclear materials at their source, mentioning as an
example joint efforts with Russia and former Soviet
republics.

Randall Larsen, head of Homeland Security Associates,
questions the emphasis on nuclear detection being in
major ports.

"Now, let's face it, if you had an arsenal of three
nuclear weapons and you're a terrorist organization,
are you just going to put it in a shipping container
and say hey send it to Chicago?!( he asked.  !'I would
put it inside a Gulfstream [jet] and fly across the
United States.  I'd put it in a ship, the press says
al-Qaida may have up to 80 ships, I would put it in a
ship and drive it into a port, it would never get to
your detector there in your screening place.  You know
set it off in Long Beach or Los Angeles or in New
York, just as it's pulling into port.  What good is a
detector going to do there?  There are 7000 miles of
unguarded border here, so we say we're going to put
these detectors at these major crossing points.  They
[terrorists] are not stupid."

The focus on potential nuclear and biological
terrorism coincides with new reports concerning
aviation security since September 2001.

One by the Inspector General of the Department of
Homeland Security cites a lack of improvement in the
ability of airport screeners to detect hidden weapons.
 A similar assessment is expected in an upcoming
report by the Government Accountability Office.

"Three-and-a-half years after those horrific terrorist
attacks there is still a very vital need for some
immediate aviation security improvements," said
Congressman John Mica, chairman of the House Aviation
Subcommittee.

In 2002, the federal government's new Transportation
Security Administration assumed responsibility for
airport screening. 
 
Homeland security officials maintain that Americans
are safer as a result, but attribute remaining
weaknesses to problems with training, equipment and
management.

000.

 



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources 
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EHLuJD/.WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to