http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/3/obamas-state-islamic-denial/

 


Obama's state of Islamic denial


Note to Barack: 'Allahu akbar' is a Muslim war cry


By THE WASHINGTON TIMES
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/the-washington-times/> 

-

The Washington Times

5:39 p.m., Thursday, March 3, 2011

MugshotWIGGLE ROOM: President Obama is willing to give states the
opportunity to opt out of parts of the health care law. (Bloomberg)

U.S. troops are gunned down by a shooter who screams "Allahu akbar!" before
opening fire. Official statements are rushed out: The perpetrator was a lone
wolf; his motive was unclear; there are no links to terrorism. Sound
familiar? It should, because when Islam is the cause of American tragedy,
President Obama hides his head in the sand. 

On Wednesday, a young Kosovar named Arif Uka
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/arif-uka/>  opened fire on a bus load
of U.S. Air Force <http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/us-air-force/>
personnel in Frankfurt, Germany
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/germany/> , killing two and wounding
two more. Witnesses say he repeatedly shouted the jihadist battle cry,
"Allahu akbar" as he emptied his weapon and screamed "Jihad! Jihad!" when
tackled by German police
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/german-police/> . Uka
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/arif-uka/> 's victims had been
heading to the fight in Afghanistan
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/afghanistan/>  but because the
jihadists have a global battlespace, the war came to them instead. 

Mr. Obama made a typical noncommittal statement shortly after the shooting,
saying it was a "stark reminder of the extraordinary sacrifices that our men
and women in uniform are making all around the world to keep us safe, and
the dangers that they face all around the globe." He made no mention of the
nature of the threat or the reason for the sacrifices. In this respect, he
was behaving true to form. 

The Frankfurt shooting is the latest in a troubling series of jihadist
terror attacks in which the Obama administration refuses to face reality.
Among the first was the June 1, 2009, shooting at a recruiting station in
Little Rock. Abdul Hakim Mujahid Muhammad
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/abdul-hakim-mujahid-muhammad/> , a
Muslim convert who had recently travelled to Yemen, killed one U.S. Army
recruiter and wounded another. Muhammad
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/abdul-hakim-mujahid-muhammad/>  told
police if other troops had been available, he would have shot them too. The
White House <http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/white-house/>  waited two
days before making a statement that omitted any reference to the attacker or
his jihadist motives. 

The Nov. 5, 2009, Fort Hood massacre, in which 14 were killed and 30
wounded, was given a persistent coat of whitewash from the Obama
administration. The first coat was applied with initial statements that
shooter Nidal Malik Hassan was a "lone wolf" and continued through the
comprehensive "force protection review" that somehow omitted any reference
to Hasan's jihadist motives or contacts with al Qaeda. 

The Obama team had a similarly slippery reaction to the Dec. 25, 2009,
attempted "underwear bomb" attack on Northwest flight 253. Al Qaeda-linked
bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was initially not even charged with
attempting to commit an act of terrorism. Faisal Shahzad, who attempted the
Times Square bombing in May 2010, was also called a lone wolf with no ties
to terrorism and was even described as more a victim of the economic
downturn than a committed Islamic extremist. In all these cases, the initial
assessments turned out to be wrong, yet the White House
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/white-house/>  still obstinately
refuses to discuss the jihadist motives of the terrorists involved. 

The Obama administration's knee-jerk instinct to deny reality in hopes it
will go away is clearly not working. How many Americans have to die before
Mr. Obama at long last admits the nature of the Islamist threat that killed
them?

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to