Re: [ossec-list] Re: active-response question on the ossec server Options

2011-06-20 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 19, 2011, at 6:09 PM, pierz wrote: Yes exactly, regarding the manual, this is the purpose of the locationall/location statement. But agents doesn't block IP if the attack occur on the server. That seems to be correct. I haven't tried

Re: [ossec-list] Re: active-response question on the ossec server Options

2011-06-20 Thread Christopher Moraes
What OS are your agents running on? On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 6:09 PM, pierz pierz.h...@gmail.com wrote: Yes exactly, regarding the manual, this is the purpose of the locationall/location statement. But agents doesn't block IP if the attack occur on the server. On 17 juin, 02:09, Jason

[ossec-list] Re: active-response question on the ossec server Options

2011-06-19 Thread pierz
Yes exactly, regarding the manual, this is the purpose of the locationall/location statement. But agents doesn't block IP if the attack occur on the server. On 17 juin, 02:09, Jason Frisvold xenoph...@godshell.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 16, 2011, at 1:59

[ossec-list] Re: active-response question on the ossec server

2007-12-06 Thread Peter M. Abraham
Hi Daniel: Welcome to the human race smile, and thank you for letting me know about having two entries. I'm testing that now. Thank you again.

[ossec-list] Re: active-response question on the ossec server

2007-12-05 Thread Peter M. Abraham
Greetings Daniel: The all|server in location ended up just putting the active-response on the server, and missed all of the agents. If I used two sets of active responses (same sid's), one with location all and one with location server, would that work or would the last set overwrite the first

[ossec-list] Re: active-response question on the ossec server

2007-12-02 Thread Peter M. Abraham
Greetings Daniel: The all|server in location ended up just putting the active-response on the server, and missed all of the agents. If I used two sets of active responses (same sid's), one with location all and one with location server, would that work or would the last set overwrite the first

[ossec-list] Re: active-response question on the ossec server

2007-11-29 Thread Peter M. Abraham
Hi Daniel: Thank you.

[ossec-list] Re: active-response question on the ossec server

2007-11-29 Thread Peter M. Abraham
Hi Daniel: I just found out that the all|server ends up just using active- response on the server. The agents were not updated -- not on the initial receiving agent, or any of the other agents. Please advise. Thank you.

[ossec-list] Re: active-response question on the ossec server

2007-11-28 Thread Daniel Cid
Hi Peter, Just changing the config to the following should to it: locationall|server/location Hope it helps. -- Daniel B. Cid dcid ( at ) ossec.net On Nov 28, 2007 2:26 PM, Peter M. Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings: We use the locationall/location in active-response to block

[ossec-list] Re: Active response question

2007-08-21 Thread Daniel Cid
Hi Peter, They should happen almost at the same time, with the active response before the e-mail (most of the time). Basically, as soon as the alert is fired, it is sent to the os-remoted (on the server), which forwards to the correct agent. Hope it helps. -- Daniel B. Cid dcid ( at )

[ossec-list] Re: Active response question

2007-08-20 Thread Daniel Cid
Hi Peter, Note that the timeout for the active response is of 10 minutes, so after that the ip is going to be removed from block list. If you look at /var/ossec/logs/active-responses.log do you see the responses being called? (look at the agent that generated the alert and not at the server). If