Hi Waldek,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:49 AM Waldek Kozaczuk
wrote:
> Some questions about the evaluation setup and measurements:
>>>
>>> - Did you establish a baseline with bare metal configuration?
>>>
>> How would I create baseline with with bare metal configuration for 1, 2,
> 4 CPUs? With
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:14 PM Waldek Kozaczuk
wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 8:24:23 PM UTC-4, דור לאור wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:36 PM Waldek Kozaczuk
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Overall I must say I am not a performance tuning/measuring expert and
>>> clearly have lots of
On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 8:24:23 PM UTC-4, דור לאור wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:36 PM Waldek Kozaczuk > wrote:
>
>> Overall I must say I am not a performance tuning/measuring expert and
>> clearly have lots of things to learn ;-) BTW can you point me to any
>> performance
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:36 PM Waldek Kozaczuk
wrote:
> Overall I must say I am not a performance tuning/measuring expert and
> clearly have lots of things to learn ;-) BTW can you point me to any
> performance setup/procedures/docs that you guys used with OSv?
>
I tried to look but didn't
Thanks for the article. I definitely heard about Toro.
I have not had time to thoroughly read all the slides but it looks like
unikernel. But I did not see it advertised as such. Can it run unmodified
Linux executables like JVM?
On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 6:59:30 AM UTC-4, Matias Vara
On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 4:51:05 AM UTC-4, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:48 AM Pekka Enberg > wrote:
>
>> Hi Waldek!
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:29 AM Waldek Kozaczuk > > wrote:
>>
>>> Last week I spent some time investigating OSv performance and comparing
Overall I must say I am not a performance tuning/measuring expert and
clearly have lots of things to learn ;-) BTW can you point me to any
performance setup/procedures/docs that you guys used with OSv?
I also feel I have tried to kill too many birds with one stone. Ideally I
should have divided
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 3:59 AM Matias Vara wrote:
> Hello Waldek,
>
> The experiments are very interesting. I showed something similar at
> OSSumit'18 (see
> https://github.com/torokernel/papers/blob/master/OSSummit18.pdf). What I
> do not understand from your conclusions is why do you expect
Hello Waldek,
The experiments are very interesting. I showed something similar at
OSSumit'18 (see
https://github.com/torokernel/papers/blob/master/OSSummit18.pdf). What I do
not understand from your conclusions is why do you expect that OSv scales
with the number of cores? Maybe I did not
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:48 AM Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Waldek!
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:29 AM Waldek Kozaczuk
> wrote:
>
>> Last week I spent some time investigating OSv performance and comparing
>> it to Docker and Linux guests.
>>
>
> Nice!
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:29 AM Waldek
Hi Waldek!
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:29 AM Waldek Kozaczuk
wrote:
> Last week I spent some time investigating OSv performance and comparing it
> to Docker and Linux guests.
>
Nice!
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:29 AM Waldek Kozaczuk
wrote:
> The test setup looked like this:
>
> *Host:*
>
>
While the performance numbers indicate something, a mac book is a horrible
environment for performance
testing. There are effects of other desktop apps, hyperthreading, etc.
Also 1gbps network can be a bottle neck. Every benchmark case should have a
matching performance
analysis and point to the
Last week I spent some time investigating OSv performance and comparing it
to Docker and Linux guests. To that end I adopted
"unikernels-v-containers"' repo by Tom Goethals and extended it with 2 new
apps (Rust and Node.js) and new scripts to build and deploy OSv apps on
QEMU/KVM -
13 matches
Mail list logo
