Re: [OTR-dev] Attention OTR packagers: provide RC1 feedback by the end of Monday

2014-10-20 Thread Mokhtar Naamani
Hello, RC1 compiles successfully to js using latest emscripten release https://github.com/mnaamani/crypto-emscripten/tree/test-libotr-4.1.0-rc1 https://github.com/mnaamani/otr4-em/tree/test-4.1.0-rc1 ​ I will release a new version of otr4-em npmjs module on final release of 4.1.0 ​Mokhtar​ Naama

Re: [OTR-dev] pidgin-otr release for Debian Jessie?

2014-10-20 Thread intrigeri
Greg Troxel wrote (20 Oct 2014 12:29:01 GMT) : > I have now actually had an OTR conversation with someone, with me using the > rc1 > tarballs of libotr and pidgin-otr, pidgin 2.10.9, with the other person > using Adium. All seems ok. On the inter-operability front, I forgot to mention that I ha

Re: [OTR-dev] pidgin-otr release for Debian Jessie?

2014-10-20 Thread David Goulet
On 20 Oct (15:31:37), Ian Goldberg wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:29:01AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > > I have now actually had an OTR conversation with someone, with me using the > > rc1 > > tarballs of libotr and pidgin-otr, pidgin 2.10.9, with the other person > > using Adium. All seems

Re: [OTR-dev] pidgin-otr release for Debian Jessie?

2014-10-20 Thread Ian Goldberg
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:29:01AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > I have now actually had an OTR conversation with someone, with me using the > rc1 > tarballs of libotr and pidgin-otr, pidgin 2.10.9, with the other person > using Adium. All seems ok. Great. I'll wait until the end of today, as pr

Re: [OTR-dev] pidgin-otr release for Debian Jessie?

2014-10-20 Thread Greg Troxel
I have now actually had an OTR conversation with someone, with me using the rc1 tarballs of libotr and pidgin-otr, pidgin 2.10.9, with the other person using Adium. All seems ok. pgpJE24DEkRW_.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ OTR-dev mailing list

Re: [OTR-dev] Attention OTR packagers: provide RC1 feedback by the end of Monday

2014-10-20 Thread Greg Troxel
Also, my pkgsrc build was against libgcrypt-1.6.2nb2. The nb2 just means two little changes to the packaging -- it's 1.6.2. pgpnvYDRBJhC6.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ OTR-dev mailing list OTR-dev@lists.cypherpunks.ca http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/

Re: [OTR-dev] Attention OTR packagers: provide RC1 feedback by the end of Monday

2014-10-20 Thread David Goulet
On 20 Oct (09:51:37), Ian Goldberg wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 04:23:08PM -0700, Chris Ballinger wrote: > > Should this be compiled against libgcrypt 1.6 or 1.5.x? > > I've been using 1.5.x, since that's what's on my Ubuntu. I'd love to > know whether something goes amiss with 1.6, though.

Re: [OTR-dev] Attention OTR packagers: provide RC1 feedback by the end of Monday

2014-10-20 Thread Ian Goldberg
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:20:31AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Ian Goldberg wrote (20 Oct 2014 08:51:37 GMT) : > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 04:23:08PM -0700, Chris Ballinger wrote: > >> Should this be compiled against libgcrypt 1.6 or 1.5.x? > > > I've been using 1.5.x, since that's what's o

Re: [OTR-dev] Attention OTR packagers: provide RC1 feedback by the end of Monday

2014-10-20 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Ian Goldberg wrote (20 Oct 2014 08:51:37 GMT) : > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 04:23:08PM -0700, Chris Ballinger wrote: >> Should this be compiled against libgcrypt 1.6 or 1.5.x? > I've been using 1.5.x, since that's what's on my Ubuntu. I'd love to > know whether something goes amiss with 1.6, t

Re: [OTR-dev] Attention OTR packagers: provide RC1 feedback by the end of Monday

2014-10-20 Thread Ian Goldberg
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 04:23:08PM -0700, Chris Ballinger wrote: > Should this be compiled against libgcrypt 1.6 or 1.5.x? I've been using 1.5.x, since that's what's on my Ubuntu. I'd love to know whether something goes amiss with 1.6, though. - Ian ___