On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 07:46 +0200, Daniel Hiepler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vom: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 07:35:32 +0200
I presume all the data pins are connected together and all the
ground pins (and VDD for DS1820) are connected together. Except
for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vom: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:47:35 +0200
Without grounding the VDD you are only lucky if the devices work as
they should.
There might also be problems with reflections in the cables, and that
is perhaps not a problem for digitemp if it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi christian...
i got some new infos which may ease the debugging process for you...
i managed to detect the DS2408 by removing all other devices from the
bus. Only then the device shows up. But obviously it is only a problem
of detection. I used
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 08:29 +0200, Christian Magnusson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 14:22 +, Chris Baechle wrote:
I currently have a DS9490R usb adapter that I can not get owfs or
owhttpd to recognize.
I have gotten owfs to work with other distributions. However, I can not
get it
Hi rigid,
My point of view is to do from the simplest step by step to the
target.
1) you are saying you have got a non-cd-rom system. Why just not to
install some unused CD-ROM (I think it is possible to get it anywhere
for free these days). My point of view is this is the simplest step
you can
Great news. FUSE will be part of the standard kernel, and thus presumably
available for OWFS. I'm guessing that the other distributions will join
Debian and Gentoo in including it.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [fuse-devel] FUSE merged to 2.6.14!
Date: Friday 09 September
On Friday 09 September 2005 01:13 am, Christian Magnusson wrote:
I am running FC4 too at work, and why not add /usr/local/lib to
ld.so.conf just to be sure you don't forget to move the libraries
to /usr/lib when you update fuse next time. I think this is a much
better solution.
more
On Friday 09 September 2005 04:03 am, Daniel Hiepler wrote:
i'm pretty sure it's a bug...
if you want you can send me a patch that enables debug-output for
passive-adapters... anything you want btw. it's kinda strange that
the cheapest/least-complex adaptor is the one least tested... :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vom: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 22:38:09 -0400
Well, the passive adapter has:
1. the worst performance
2. the highest CPU utilization
3. the most touchy construction (witness all the variants)
4. the least availability
on the other hand:
1.
