Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: running on Mac OS X

2005-10-16 Thread Christian Magnusson
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 05:00, Ross Cathriner wrote: Still no joy. The parsing of the address does look better, don't know if its right or not. INFO: Set DS9490 [818DE1240063] unique id to adapter [004/007-04fa-2490-ff-ff] Things we know: I changed to the 004/007 usb port , Vendor

[Owfs-developers] Re: New owcapi interface. Happy?

2005-10-16 Thread Sven Geggus
Paul Alfille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok uploaded some OWCAPI changes. I tried to compile a simple example Source, all I get is an undefined reference to 'capi_mutex': $ cc -I/opt/owfs/include/ -L/opt/owfs/lib -lowcapi owtest.c /opt/owfs/lib/libowcapi.so: undefined reference to 'capi_mutex'

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: running on Mac OS X

2005-10-16 Thread Ross Cathriner
HAPPY, HAPPY, JOY, JOYhttpd how fully operational on MacOSX.  Put another feather in your hat.If you use bash:   USB_DEBUG=2                    export USB_DEBUG --- Start owhttpd with all available debug-output:   owhttpd --foreground --error_level=9 --error_print=2 -u -p 3001 Make one access

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: New owcapi interface. Happy?

2005-10-16 Thread Paul Alfille
Oops. My error. I didn't define the mutex properly. Try it now. Paul On Sunday 16 October 2005 08:48 am, Sven Geggus wrote: Paul Alfille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok uploaded some OWCAPI changes. I tried to compile a simple example Source, all I get is an undefined reference to

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: running on Mac OS X

2005-10-16 Thread Christian Magnusson
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 17:57, Ross Cathriner wrote: HAPPY, HAPPY, JOY, JOY httpd how fully operational on MacOSX. Put another feather in your hat. The full transscript can be viewed here: http://homepage.mac.com/rnc/startup_log.txt The key factor is the --foreground, and terminal

Re: [Owfs-developers] Re: running on Mac OS X

2005-10-16 Thread Ross Cathriner
Can you explain why you did killall owhttpd ? Isn't it enough to press Ctrl-C in the terminal windows, or does the program start in the background even if you start it with --foreground option? Yes Ctrl-C works fine. Perhaps it's working better for you if you put it in background with