Of what I have understood, Roberto just presented an all-in-one logo for
us to check how it would look like. I don't think an animated image is
his proposal ;)
btw. I liked the main concept, esp. the 'suite' version and font
Jan Kandziora wrote on 12/2/2007 12:06:
Am Montag, 12. Februar 2007
I've put the proposals at http://www.owfs.org/index.php?page=logo-poll
I'll try to keep the page up to date.
One question is size. At least the initial request was for a logo to
acknowledge OWFS use on sites that use OWFS. David Lissuik also sugggests
that we'll want to use the logo on PCB silk
On 2/9/07, Pedro Côrte-Real [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to use owfs in a Ruby project so I decided to port the Python
ownet client to Ruby.
Attached is a more or less straight port of the Python version of
ownet. I don't know if someone wants to check this first before I put
it into CVS.
PCB... well i was thinking about owfs name owfs community owfs marketing
since owfs is an open source software i don't think that owfs boards
must be open source, maybe or maybe not... since it's an very good
technology i think that it could be somethink like mysql license, for
students or home
On 2/12/07, Roberto Spadim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PCB... well i was thinking about owfs name owfs community owfs marketing
since owfs is an open source software i don't think that owfs boards
must be open source, maybe or maybe not... since it's an very good
technology i think that it could
OK :)
We could reorder our site to allow easier hardware boards search
Paul Alfille escreveu:
On 2/12/07, *Roberto Spadim* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PCB... well i was thinking about owfs name owfs community owfs
marketing
since owfs is an open source
Tried on Ubuntu, as well. Success.
Linux ubuntu 2.6.15-27-386 #1 PREEMPT Fri Dec 8 17:51:56 UTC 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
libusb-0.1-4
Perhaps this is a problem with libusb versions?
Paul Alfille
On 2/11/07, J Kvalvaag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I tried the current CVS version under SUSE 10.1
i had problems with a nic card using PREEMPT kernels... try the default
kernel without preempt
Paul Alfille escreveu:
Tried on Ubuntu, as well. Success.
Linux ubuntu 2.6.15-27-386 #1 PREEMPT Fri Dec 8 17:51:56 UTC 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
libusb-0.1-4
Perhaps this is a problem with libusb
On 2/12/07, Roberto Spadim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i had problems with a nic card using PREEMPT kernels... try the default
kernel without preempt
Paul Alfille escreveu:
Tried on Ubuntu, as well. Success.
Linux ubuntu 2.6.15-27-386 #1 PREEMPT Fri Dec 8 17:51:56 UTC 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
On 2/12/07, Pedro Côrte-Real [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smaller stuff:
- Abstract the messages into a class of their own so that instead of
pack/unpack we can do msg.flags = whatever. Should make the code
prettier and probably simpler.
This is done now and should make implementing persistent
On 2/12/07, Paul Alfille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/12/07, Roberto Spadim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i had problems with a nic card using PREEMPT kernels... try the default
kernel without preempt
Paul Alfille escreveu:
Tried on Ubuntu, as well. Success.
Linux ubuntu
Standards are a good thing. And OWFS has become a major player in terms
of 1-Wire work. As an end user, I'd like to know that my hardware is
fully supported and tested by OWFS and uses a wiring standard like
1WRJ45 when I buy the product along with knowing any enclosures IP
rating. (Weather proof
On 2/12/07, Pedro Côrte-Real [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no one objects I'll put this in CVS tonight.
I forgot to attach the code. Here it is.
Pedro.
connection.rb
Description: application/ruby
-
Using Tomcat but need
Tried on Ubuntu, as well. Success.
Linux ubuntu 2.6.15-27-386 #1 PREEMPT Fri Dec 8 17:51:56 UTC 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
libusb-0.1-4
I made a typo about my version of libusb. I am using libusb-0.1.12, sorry.
Today I tried kernel 2.6.17.13 (Slackware extra). Guess what, OWFS-2.6p1 works
like a
some things that we need to allow a better comunity:
standard
better hardware documents
manyy hardware documents (since we can do every think with onewire
(slow control) an plc could be replaced with some computers nanoitx or
wireless routers...)
a world wide test server ( i will put my
On 2/12/07, Pedro Côrte-Real [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bigger stuff:
- Unit test this. I was going to write a mock owserver replacement
to use for testing but then I saw that owserver supports a fake
backend that gives random values. The problem with this is that if I
do someSensor.templow =
On 2/13/07, Paul Alfille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pedro, your note suggests the answer!
While --fake is good for random responses, we want predictable responses to
test against.
How about --tester as a simulated adapter.
1. It would return known devices
2. It would return known values
On 2/12/07, Pedro Côrte-Real [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you thought about writable atributes? For full testing the --test
device must actually save the value and return it if it's read.
Pedro.
Hmm,
We're not testing the owserver, just the clients. How about write returns an
error if
18 matches
Mail list logo
