[Owfs-developers] Overdrive and other per-bus settings

2007-10-16 Thread Paul Alfille
I'm writing for design help. Briefly there are some settings, like overdrive and some of the flex-time parameters that pertain to individual adapters. There are 2 alternatives: 1. List them only in the specific bus.n directory 2. List them in the main directory as overdrive.0, overdrive.1, ... We

Re: [Owfs-developers] Overdrive and other per-bus settings

2007-10-16 Thread Bauer, Steven J.
Why not put the information that pertains to the individual adapters under the system along with the adapters that it pertains to. This would allow a person to keep the settings with the adapter that needs it as well as add any other adapter specific settings as well. Steve

Re: [Owfs-developers] Overdrive and other per-bus settings

2007-10-16 Thread Paul Alfille
On 10/16/07, Bauer, Steven J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not put the information that pertains to the individual adapters under the system along with the adapters that it pertains to. This would allow a person to keep the settings with the adapter that needs it as well as add any other

Re: [Owfs-developers] Overdrive and other per-bus settings

2007-10-16 Thread Paul Alfille
On 10/16/07, Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. /system/adapter doesn't exists in the root directory. Only /bus.x/system/adapter (or some better name) i.e. adapter-specific information and settings has to be specifically addressed via bus.x for remote adapters, this might

Re: [Owfs-developers] Overdrive and other per-bus settings

2007-10-16 Thread Bauer, Steven J.
I was thinking something like /system/adapter and have an istance for every adapter both local and remote. Then again, would there be any harm at having it under both /bus.# and under /system Steve From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [Owfs-developers] Overdrive and other per-bus settings

2007-10-16 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Paul Alfille: /bus.n/interface/overdrive ? /bus.n/master/overdrive ? Either of these would be fine; I'm more partial to interface since that word doesn't require us to care about whether it's a master/slave bus. (Not every user is a hard-core techie. ;-) And no, I don't want to see

Re: [Owfs-developers] Overdrive and other per-bus settings

2007-10-16 Thread Paul Alfille
On 10/16/07, Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Paul Alfille: /bus.n/interface/overdrive ? /bus.n/master/overdrive ? Either of these would be fine; I'm more partial to interface since that word doesn't require us to care about whether it's a master/slave bus. (Not every

[Owfs-developers] Status of support for the DS2436 --update

2007-10-16 Thread Gregg Levine
Hello! Essentially the thing works. I stuck the basic DS2436 design on a perf board from RS that I originally was going to use for something else. Then attached wire wrap wire to its pins and to pins connected to screw terminals from the same place. Testing several times under the Windows EVK