I'll test against known humidity. In theory, the device could give numbers
100%. Does it seem otherwise accurate?
Paul Alfille
On Dec 29, 2007 8:27 PM, Pedro Côrte-Real [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 30, 2007 1:18 AM, Pedro Côrte-Real [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- The first one is that
On Dec 30, 2007 12:05 PM, Paul Alfille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll test against known humidity. In theory, the device could give numbers
100%. Does it seem otherwise accurate?
I've only started keeping log of values today but we've had them um on
a webpage for a few months and we've seen it
Are you sure the humidity sensor is HIH-3610?
We can certainly clip the values to 0-100 but I want to make sure that there
isn't an error, and that there isn't lost information if we do that.
Paul Alfille
On Dec 30, 2007 12:22 PM, Pedro Côrte-Real [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 30, 2007
On Dec 30, 2007 5:41 PM, Paul Alfille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure the humidity sensor is HIH-3610?
I just checked the type attribute in owfs itself. What else do I need
to look at to confirm this? I'll try to look up the info in the
manufacturer's datasheets. (we bought some
Hi all,
I just wanted to tell you have I compiled lots of ipk-builds today. The
owfs-ipk-packages are updated to version 2.7p2.
I have also made some updates to temploggerd, and the current version is now
1.3.8. Temploggerd can now use the owshell-commands instead of fuse+owfs to
collect
