From a users perspective I want more flexible slave devices which are
capable of making decisions themselves.
With the host (OWFS) providing a means of configuration and
supervision only. At this stage I do not care about what
hardware platform the slaves takes on however I am
more
For the Clock controlled output Slave. I understand its hard to get an
onboard RTC however I would like to see something like the BAE0910 have an
I2C interface for fixed type functions
RTC: http://www.futurlec.com/Mini_DS1307.shtml
And
I2C I/O bus expander chip Connected via direct ribbon to
Just note that it is not sufficient to poll alarm directory to discover
units with threshold voltages .
The alarm condition is only set after a conversion. You have to trigger this
conversion in you polling loop via a simultaneous command.
Pascal
2010/2/26 Alessio Sangalli ale...@manoweb.com
A PC is definitely more powerful, and its programming paradigms are
easier to address, true. However, we've played those games in our OW
setup, and have been going back to the do-it-on-hardware side. For
us, we have a large network of OW devices (often 50+), a PC software
suite written by a
Jim,
You are closer to my view of control systems. I generally want
susbsystems to be able to act autonomously with the brains doing the
more complex work. So it's more like a hierarchy than a pure mesh. I
also think about redundancy. Just because 1wire is low cost doesn't mean
it can't be
my thoughts within the text...
2010/2/26 Jim Kusznir jkusz...@gmail.com
A PC is definitely more powerful, and its programming paradigms are
easier to address, true. However, we've played those games in our OW
setup, and have been going back to the do-it-on-hardware side. For
us, we have a
Jerry others:
I was thinking that a personality could be loaded into the chip via
owfs (just as a memory write, basically). While I haven't worked on
this enough to know the size, I also envision this being an infrequent
task (when you first set up a new device, or when you do a major
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Pascal Baerten
pascal.baer...@gmail.com wrote:
my thoughts within the text...
2010/2/26 Jim Kusznir jkusz...@gmail.com
A PC is definitely more powerful, and its programming paradigms are
easier to address, true. However, we've played those games in our OW
I tried:
$ owserver --version
owserver version:
2.7p29
libow version:
2.7p29
$ sudo owserver -d /dev/ttyS0 -p 3000 -t 30
Password:
$ owdir -s 3000
/28.2CCD8000
/09.9B309901
/bus.0
/uncached
/settings
/system
/statistics
/structure
/simultaneous
/alarm
$ owdir -s 3000
