Azure Pricing

2009-09-21 Thread Nick Randolph
As a follow up on my previous show of hands, I was wondering how many people 
had taken a close look at the pricing model for Windows Azure. Does anyone have 
any opinions on the proposed pricing?  Does it suit the way you would charge 
for your application/service?

One of the questions that come to mind for me is the choice between Windows 
Azure table storage and SQL Azure. Has anyone done the pricing comparison and 
prepared to provide a commentary on their findings?

During TechEd I spent a bit of time investigating Azure pricing and have a 
rough calculation spreadsheet I put together.  I'd be happy to share this with 
anyone who'd be prepared to provide feedback on it.

Nick Randolph | Built To Roam | Microsoft MVP - Device Application Development 
| +61 412 413 425
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way. Built To Roam does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or 
attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may 
not reflect the views or opinions of Built To Roam.

___
ozazure mailing list
ozazure@lists.codify.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozazure


Re: Azure Pricing

2009-09-21 Thread Craig van Nieuwkerk
I had a quick look at the pricing of SQL Azure and it seemed pretty
expensive. A scenario I was looking to set up was to have a vertical
market application where each user will have a separate database which
is selected based upon their user when they logged in. With the
current pricing that is not really a viable option when I may have
100+ databases.

Craig

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Nick Randolph n...@builttoroam.com wrote:
 As a follow up on my previous show of hands, I was wondering how many people
 had taken a close look at the pricing model for Windows Azure. Does anyone
 have any opinions on the proposed pricing?  Does it suit the way you would
 charge for your application/service?



 One of the questions that come to mind for me is the choice between Windows
 Azure table storage and SQL Azure. Has anyone done the pricing comparison
 and prepared to provide a commentary on their findings?



 During TechEd I spent a bit of time investigating Azure pricing and have a
 rough calculation spreadsheet I put together.  I’d be happy to share this
 with anyone who’d be prepared to provide feedback on it.



 Nick Randolph | Built To Roam | Microsoft MVP - Device Application
 Development | +61 412 413 425
 The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
 intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
 email in any way. Built To Roam does not guarantee the integrity of any
 emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's
 own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Built To Roam.



 ___
 ozazure mailing list
 ozazure@lists.codify.com
 http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozazure


___
ozazure mailing list
ozazure@lists.codify.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozazure


RE: Show of hands

2009-09-21 Thread John OBrien
I've made two specific Azure apps Nick, one created DeepZoom images from RSS
feeds the other creates animations of traffic cameras from around the world.

Heavily used:

Windows Azure - site/service hosting

Windows Azure - table/blob storage

Windows Azure - queues

Windows Live Id

 

Also been using the Blob storage for Image tiles, once Azure goes commercial
after PDC this is the only part I'll be able to keep using L

 

I think Rob Farley has done a bunch of stuff with SQL Azure.

 

The last thing I want to do before the free period ends is some serious
parallel processing with F#, but I doubt I'll have the time.

 

What has everyone else been doing?

 

John.

 

From: ozazure-boun...@lists.codify.com
[mailto:ozazure-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of Nick Randolph
Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2009 7:09 AM
To: ozazure@lists.codify.com
Subject: Show of hands

 

Out of interest, can I see a quick show of hands on who is using/trying out
the following:

 

Windows Azure - site/service hosting

Windows Azure - table/blob storage

Windows Azure - queues

SQL Azure

.NET Services - Service Bus

.NET Services - Queues  Routers

Windows Live Id

Live Framework (yeh I know this has been suspended but I'm interested to
know who was using it)

Other Live Services

 

Nick Randolph | Built To Roam | Microsoft MVP - Device Application
Development | +61 412 413 425
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way. Built To Roam does not guarantee the integrity of any
emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's
own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Built To Roam.

 

___
ozazure mailing list
ozazure@lists.codify.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozazure


RE: Show of hands

2009-09-21 Thread Nick Randolph
Carl

Just be aware that things are changing on the .NET Services front 
(http://blogs.msdn.com/netservices/archive/2009/09/18/update-on-the-next-microsoft-net-services-ctp.aspx)
 which will remove queues and routers in the Oct CTP timeframe :(

Nick Randolph | Built To Roam | Microsoft MVP - Device Application Development 
| +61 412 413 425
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way. Built To Roam does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or 
attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may 
not reflect the views or opinions of Built To Roam.

From: carl.scarl...@bankwest.com.au [mailto:carl.scarl...@bankwest.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2009 10:32 AM
To: Nick Randolph
Subject: RE: Show of hands

Haven't been able to clear my schedule to have a decent play.  I've got a 
project planned though, that will use the following:


* Windows Azure - site/service hosting

* .NET Services - Service Bus

* .NET Services - Queues  Routers

* Windows Live Id (maybe)

Carl.

Carl Scarlett
Senior .NET/WPF Developer - Genesis Team
IT Applications Delivery | bankwest
A: Level 5, 199 Hay Street | Perth | Western Australia | 6004
P: (08) 9449 8703
M: 0408 913 870
E: carl.scarl...@bankwest.com.aumailto:carl.scarl...@bankwest.com.au



From: ozazure-boun...@lists.codify.com 
[mailto:ozazure-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of Nick Randolph 
n...@builttoroam.com
Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2009 5:09 AM
To: ozazure@lists.codify.com ozazure@lists.codify.com
Subject: Show of hands

Out of interest, can I see a quick show of hands on who is using/trying out the 
following:

Windows Azure - site/service hosting
Windows Azure - table/blob storage
Windows Azure - queues
SQL Azure
.NET Services - Service Bus
.NET Services - Queues  Routers
Windows Live Id
Live Framework (yeh I know this has been suspended but I'm interested to know 
who was using it)
Other Live Services

Nick Randolph | Built To Roam | Microsoft MVP - Device Application Development 
| +61 412 413 425
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way. Built To Roam does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or 
attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may 
not reflect the views or opinions of Built To Roam.


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
___
ozazure mailing list
ozazure@lists.codify.commailto:ozazure@lists.codify.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozazure

___

Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and may not be authentic.

If you have any doubts as to the contents please telephone to confirm.

This electronic transmission including any attachments is intended only

for those to whom it is addressed. It may contain copyright material or

information that is confidential, privileged or exempt from disclosure by law.

Any claim to privilege is not waived or lost by reason of mistaken transmission

of this information. If you are not the intended recipient you must not

distribute or copy this transmission and should please notify the sender.

Your costs for doing this will be reimbursed by the sender.

We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption,

delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment.

___

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
___
ozazure mailing list
ozazure@lists.codify.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozazure


RE: Azure Pricing

2009-09-21 Thread Nick Randolph
Ah yes, the .NET Services message/bandwidth charge can be quite high.  You need 
to make sure that if you are transferring large quantities of data you ensure 
you establish a direct connection (using the Hybrid mode of the relay 
bindings), rather than piping stuff through the service bus.

Nick Randolph | Built To Roam | Microsoft MVP - Device Application Development 
| +61 412 413 425
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way. Built To Roam does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or 
attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may 
not reflect the views or opinions of Built To Roam.

From: carl.scarl...@bankwest.com.au [mailto:carl.scarl...@bankwest.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2009 10:40 AM
To: Nick Randolph
Subject: RE: Azure Pricing

At a high level, it seems priced towards enterprise applications which I think 
is a bit premature.  Early adopters will likely be project builders with small 
apps, and some of these prices will drive these types of applications away.

At the enterprise level though, I think these are okay.  I'd still suggest 
making them cheaper to entice take-up; developers (for the most part) are still 
going to have to sell the benefits to their business in order to get projects 
off the ground and businesses are loathe to take risks with pricing models that 
are new to them (especially since the GFC).

My personal gripe is the .Net Services messages charge - that seems pretty 
steep to me.

Carl.

Carl Scarlett
Senior .NET/WPF Developer - Genesis Team
IT Applications Delivery | bankwest
A: Level 5, 199 Hay Street | Perth | Western Australia | 6004
P: (08) 9449 8703
M: 0408 913 870
E: carl.scarl...@bankwest.com.aumailto:carl.scarl...@bankwest.com.au



From: ozazure-boun...@lists.codify.com 
[mailto:ozazure-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of Nick Randolph 
n...@builttoroam.com
Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2009 7:26 AM
To: ozazure@lists.codify.com ozazure@lists.codify.com
Subject: Azure Pricing

As a follow up on my previous show of hands, I was wondering how many people 
had taken a close look at the pricing model for Windows Azure. Does anyone have 
any opinions on the proposed pricing?  Does it suit the way you would charge 
for your application/service?

One of the questions that come to mind for me is the choice between Windows 
Azure table storage and SQL Azure. Has anyone done the pricing comparison and 
prepared to provide a commentary on their findings?

During TechEd I spent a bit of time investigating Azure pricing and have a 
rough calculation spreadsheet I put together.  I'd be happy to share this with 
anyone who'd be prepared to provide feedback on it.

Nick Randolph | Built To Roam | Microsoft MVP - Device Application Development 
| +61 412 413 425
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way. Built To Roam does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or 
attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may 
not reflect the views or opinions of Built To Roam.


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
___
ozazure mailing list
ozazure@lists.codify.commailto:ozazure@lists.codify.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozazure

___

Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and may not be authentic.

If you have any doubts as to the contents please telephone to confirm.

This electronic transmission including any attachments is intended only

for those to whom it is addressed. It may contain copyright material or

information that is confidential, privileged or exempt from disclosure by law.

Any claim to privilege is not waived or lost by reason of mistaken transmission

of this information. If you are not the intended recipient you must not

distribute or copy this transmission and should please notify the sender.

Your costs for doing this will be reimbursed by the sender.

We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption,

delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment.

___

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

RE: Show of hands

2009-09-21 Thread David Burela
Windows Azure - site/service hostingyes
Windows Azure - table/blob storage  yes
Windows Azure - queuesyes
SQL Azure   a little. 
It keeps on changing, and lots of the info out there is stale / confused. And 
the tooling isn't quiet there yet
.NET Services - Service Bus no
.NET Services - Queues  Routers   no
Windows Live Id   keep planning to, 
but never get around to it


From: ozazure-boun...@lists.codify.com 
[mailto:ozazure-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of Nick Randolph
Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2009 7:09 AM
To: ozazure@lists.codify.com
Subject: Show of hands

Out of interest, can I see a quick show of hands on who is using/trying out the 
following:

Windows Azure - site/service hosting
Windows Azure - table/blob storage
Windows Azure - queues
SQL Azure
.NET Services - Service Bus
.NET Services - Queues  Routers
Windows Live Id
Live Framework (yeh I know this has been suspended but I'm interested to know 
who was using it)
Other Live Services

Nick Randolph | Built To Roam | Microsoft MVP - Device Application Development 
| +61 412 413 425
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way. Built To Roam does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or 
attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may 
not reflect the views or opinions of Built To Roam.

___
ozazure mailing list
ozazure@lists.codify.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozazure


[OT?] Mesh

2009-09-21 Thread Stephen Price
Not sure if this is strictly on or off topic...

Someone at Teched mentioned to me that as Mesh (aka livemesh / www.mesh.com)
is part of services that are being retired. I think they are being replaced
with the Microsoft .Net Services (so possibly on topic for this list?). I've
looked about and can't find any info to confirm or deny this.

I use Mesh a fair bit and was wondering if anyone can point me to some
concrete info, or knows first hand? Will there be a replacement service or
will Mesh be moved to the new services? seems odd that they would drop
something given the amount of hype when it was first put out in beta.

thx,
Stephen
___
ozazure mailing list
ozazure@lists.codify.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozazure


RE: [OT?] Mesh

2009-09-21 Thread Nick Randolph
Stephen

My understanding is that the consumer product know as Live Mesh will not be 
retired.  However, the developer/application platform Live Framework has been 
withdrawn in order to be surfaced again at a later date, presumably with closer 
integration into the whole Windows Azure platform.

Note that .NET Services is not related in functionality to Live Framework, 
although we may see that some of the services that were part of Live FX surface 
in components of .NET Services.  Specifically I'm guessing that the 
authentication mechanism will probably be aligned with the Access control 
service that is part of .NET Services.

Nick Randolph | Built To Roam | Microsoft MVP - Device Application Development 
| +61 412 413 425
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way. Built To Roam does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or 
attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may 
not reflect the views or opinions of Built To Roam.

From: ozazure-boun...@lists.codify.com 
[mailto:ozazure-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Price
Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2009 11:12 AM
To: ozazure@lists.codify.com
Subject: [OT?] Mesh

Not sure if this is strictly on or off topic...

Someone at Teched mentioned to me that as Mesh (aka livemesh / 
www.mesh.comhttp://www.mesh.com) is part of services that are being retired. 
I think they are being replaced with the Microsoft .Net Services (so possibly 
on topic for this list?). I've looked about and can't find any info to confirm 
or deny this.

I use Mesh a fair bit and was wondering if anyone can point me to some concrete 
info, or knows first hand? Will there be a replacement service or will Mesh be 
moved to the new services? seems odd that they would drop something given the 
amount of hype when it was first put out in beta.

thx,
Stephen
___
ozazure mailing list
ozazure@lists.codify.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozazure