On 20 May 2010 15:49, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed that Patent law is not ideal. But I would expect it's not so
trivial to replace or remove, and you don't hear about the good
things, so your feelings towards it are almost certainly biased.
I think there is an argument that
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:03 PM, David Connors da...@codify.com wrote:
On 20 May 2010 15:49, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed that Patent law is not ideal. But I would expect it's not so
trivial to replace or remove, and you don't hear about the good
things, so your feelings
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:08 PM, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:03 PM, David Connors da...@codify.com wrote:
On 20 May 2010 15:49, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed that Patent law is not ideal. But I would expect it's not so
trivial to replace
Have you patented this comparison technique? :P
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Greg Harris
Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2010 1:22 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: How To do something every so often
Hi Everyone,
I think that this shows that we all
People really need to understand that patent lawsuits are almost
*never* about what you think they are. You should not expect that
Microsoft, or SalesForce, care about stopping your ability, or any
individuals ability, to do their work. It is strictly an asset for the
purposes of negotiation with
silky wrote:
I still think Bill's answer was superior, as it also accounts for multiple
threads/etc (although, not required in this case). Second to that would be
a (if blah rah; print thing; blah = 0) ...as your tests indicated.
You are crazy.
Reality can seem that way to some.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Arjang Assadi arjang.ass...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2010 16:08, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never been to court for a patent infringement, but I'd imagine
the *process* of showing and proving prior art is non-trivially
expensive.
Not if you
In summary;
if (silky.IsRight DateTime.Now.DayOfWeek != DayOfWeek.Friday) {
var Bill = 1 / 0;
} else {
programmersWithTooMuchTime++;
ozDotNetList++;
GregHarrisExceptionalTestMethod();
}
I'm sure this could be refactored into the number 42. Also probably needs to
be in some kind of
Thursdays. The new Fridays.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Stephen Price
Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2010 2:57 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: How To do something every so often
In summary;
if (silky.IsRight DateTime.Now.DayOfWeek !=
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Stephen Price step...@littlevoices.com wrote:
In summary;
if (silky.IsRight DateTime.Now.DayOfWeek != DayOfWeek.Friday) {
You have a strange naming-convention for constants :P
var Bill = 1 / 0;
} else {
programmersWithTooMuchTime++;
ozDotNetList++;
On 20 May 2010 15:54, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:54 PM, David Burela david.bur...@gmail.com wrote:
But would one of them be easier to implement with the .Net 4.0 parallel
extensions?
I see what's happened here. I've somehow subscribed to the ironic
humour
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:09 PM, mike smith meski...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2010 16:30, Arjang Assadi arjang.ass...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2010 16:08, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never been to court for a patent infringement, but I'd imagine
the *process* of showing
Stumbled on this today whilst looking for something else :
http://www.tfsnow.com/
Looks like a Readify site. Now take a look at the tesimonials. Surely
not.
Very strange! The URLs match my worst spam (excluding ausDotNet of course).
Have you done a whois lookup?
_
Ian Thomas
Victoria Park, Western Australia
_
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Grant Maw
Sent: Thursday, 20
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Grant Maw grant@gmail.com wrote:
Stumbled on this today whilst looking for something else :
http://www.tfsnow.com/
Looks like a Readify site. Now take a look at the tesimonials. Surely
not.
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://tfsnow.com
I suspect it
This is why you never let a domain drop. Hats off to the Russians for doing
such a good job on the SEO.
--
David Connors
Software Engineer
Codify Pty Ltd
This message was sent from my mobile device. Please excuse the brevity.
On 20/05/2010 5:37 PM, Ian Thomas il.tho...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Earlier this year I stumbled on the peer-to-patent project
www.peertopatent.org http://www.peertopatent.org/ (via some news item, I
think). I'd forgotten about it until this thread, but a search reveals that
the idea has been around for a few years.
It's an interesting concept, supposedly to
You are crazy.
Please stop feeding the tactless socially retarded troll.
Greg
18 matches
Mail list logo
