Or SFTP (not to be confused with FTPS) which works flawlessly through
firewalls, is easy to reverse publish and is secure.
I don't understand why Server 2012 still doesn't do it.
--
Richard Carde
Ph: +44 7956 356 226
On 18 Oct 2013, at 04:22, Grant Maw grant@gmail.com wrote:
Just a
: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Richard Carde
Sent: Friday, 18 October 2013 8:25 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] FTP client problems
Or SFTP (not to be confused with FTPS) which works flawlessly through
firewalls, is easy to reverse publish
@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Date: Friday, 18 October 2013 10:46 AM
To: ozDotNet ozdotnet@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Re: [OT] FTP client problems
You do need a higher end firewall though.
I didn't want to confuse matters previously, but now things have calmed down I
can add
David,
I know this might be a bit vague but I seem to recall discovering the ftp
client you use at the command prompt doesn't do something it should. eg
perhaps it doesn't support PASV or something like that. I know we can't
connect to our ftp server from it and have to use windows explorer or
October 2013 4:52 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] FTP client problems
David, FileZilla works perfectly by default and lists the files and I can see
the following in the trace (pasted below). What it's doing seems to make sense,
but if I try similar requests from the command prompt (including
Re: prescription - it isn't polite to make fun of people with mental
illnesses. http://www.riagenic.com/archives/934
Good lord, what little chance would I ever have of seeing that post or
knowing such a thing?! It was a surprising coincidence (apologies to Scott
just in case) -- Greg
Command prompt ftp doesn't do pasv. You need to use client that does or get
a stateful firewall or use a proxy
On 17/10/2013 3:51 PM, Greg Keogh g...@mira.net wrote:
David, FileZilla works perfectly by default and lists the files and I can
see the following in the trace (pasted below). What
David, we suspected a firewall at first, but it was ruled out a few days
ago. If ftp.exe doesn't do PASV at then I was accidentally wasting my time.
Web searches on this matter now hint that you're right, but I would never
have guessed such a stupid thing could be true. My little C# client is
You do need a higher end firewall though.
I didn't want to confuse matters previously, but now things have calmed
down I can add that the offending server is actually inside an Amazon AWS
server instance. I turned off the Windows firewall ages ago, but Amazon
have their own Security Group
Just a side-comment - maybe we're luddites here, but we use FTP all the
time to get things from A to B. Every single day. I know it's old, but it's
still useful.
On 18 October 2013 09:46, Greg Keogh g...@mira.net wrote:
You do need a higher end firewall though.
I didn't want to confuse
FTP is arguably a lot better for uploads as well as network devices don't
make the same assumptions about length of connections etc with FTP that
they do with HTTP.
David Connors
da...@connors.com | M +61 417 189 363
Download my v-card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors
Follow me on
Folks, I'm getting conflicting behaviour in FTP clients on our new server.
We installed an app in this new server and it died attempting to GET a file
from a remote FTP server.
So I ran ftp.exe from the command prompt to do the same thing as the app
does in code to see what happens (thinking that
, 17 October 2013 9:28 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: [OT] FTP client problems
Folks, I'm getting conflicting behaviour in FTP clients on our new server. We
installed an app in this new server and it died attempting to GET a file from a
remote FTP server.
So I ran ftp.exeftp://ftp.exe from the command
AM
*To:* ozDotNet
*Subject:* [OT] FTP client problems
** **
Folks, I'm getting conflicting behaviour in FTP clients on our new server.
We installed an app in this new server and it died attempting to GET a file
from a remote FTP server.
So I ran ftp.exe from the command
.
** **
*From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Greg Keogh
*Sent:* Thursday, 17 October 2013 9:28 AM
*To:* ozDotNet
*Subject:* [OT] FTP client problems
** **
Folks, I'm getting conflicting behaviour in FTP clients on our new server
http://i.imgur.com/5sRt9Hh.gif
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Greg Keogh
Sent: Thursday, 17 October 2013 2:47 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] FTP client problems
Chaps, FileZilla or Wireshark! The former I haven't used and I won't
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Greg Keogh g...@mira.net wrote:
Chaps, FileZilla or Wireshark! The former I haven't used and I won't learn
anything if works or nor, unless it has some tracing facility.
You will learn exactly what the problem is.
If it works with FileZilla using passive FTP
Windows explorer uses pasv, command line does not.
On 17/10/2013 3:10 PM, Greg Keogh g...@mira.net wrote:
I haven't tried FileZilla yet, but in Wireshark I have a trace of FTP
failing from the command prompt and a trace working from Windows Explorer.
As I expected, the results are so different
Did you miss this step from Jorke's post?
...and attach the cap
Cheers
Ken
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Greg Keogh
Sent: Thursday, 17 October 2013 4:11 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] FTP client problems
I haven't tried FileZilla
Did you miss this step from Jorke’s post?
Yeah, look, it's not Friday and I'm up shit creek -- Greg
to
figure it out otherwise.
** **
*From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Greg Keogh
*Sent:* Thursday, 17 October 2013 9:28 AM
*To:* ozDotNet
*Subject:* [OT] FTP client problems
** **
Folks, I'm getting conflicting behaviour
David, FileZilla works perfectly by default and lists the files and I can
see the following in the trace (pasted below). What it's doing seems to
make sense, but if I try similar requests from the command prompt
(including the PASV) I still get 501 Server cannot accept argument when I
attempt to
22 matches
Mail list logo
