Re: WCF bindings readerQuotas element

2011-01-31 Thread Wallace Turner
Hi Peter, I looked into this a while ago and whilst the details escape me, the config I settled on was the following: readerQuotas maxDepth=32 maxStringContentLength=2147483647 maxArrayLength=2147483647 maxBytesPerRead=4096 maxNameTableCharCount=2147483647/ Empirically, this allowed me to

Re: WCF bindings readerQuotas element

2011-01-31 Thread Stephen Liedig
Hi Peter, have you considered streaming ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms731913.aspx)? Might be the better option given the variable file sizes. Regards, Steve On 31 January 2011 09:09, Wallace Turner w.tur...@fex.com.au wrote: Hi Peter, I looked into this a while ago and

Re: WCF bindings readerQuotas element

2011-01-31 Thread Peter Maddin
Ok Thanks It would be nice to know what they actually do and what behaviour they alter. If you have maxed out the attribute values and have left maxBytesPerRead as the default, I would guess its impact at a performance level with the size of network IO requests. Increase the value for

Re: WCF bindings readerQuotas element

2011-01-31 Thread Peter Maddin
have you considered streaming I had heard of it but hadn't gone into the details (thanks for the link). I think streaming is more for large volumes of data (video and audio streaming). My downloads are lots of fairly small files (with some exceptions). I am leaning towards chunked file