Re: [OT] Facebook advertising

2013-12-02 Thread mike smith
A side note, or a snide note? The downside of not sharing is not being able to read books in a joint account. Well, you can, but you'll have to file the drm off first. I advocate doing that not cos I'm looking to rip off authors, but because I've got a huge library of .lit books I can no longer

[OT] We need a senior developer ASAP!

2013-12-02 Thread Anton Felich
Hey guys, We are looking to take another senior developer on board to work on a large SaaS application. Link to job ad is: -

RE: [OT] We need a senior developer ASAP!

2013-12-02 Thread Nathan Chere
If you're serious you should try putting the hourly rate in the ad too. It's not hard. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Anton Felich Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2013 8:21 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: [OT] We need a senior developer ASAP! Hey

RE: [OT] We need a senior developer ASAP!

2013-12-02 Thread Anton Felich
Well that is going to depend entirely on the applicant's skill set and level of experience isn't it. We are happy to pay anywhere from 80k -120k + super. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Nathan Chere Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2013 10:06

Re: [OT] We need a senior developer ASAP!

2013-12-02 Thread mike smith
So if it's 80k they're going to be doing less work? The likely answer is yes, but does it mean you're going to hire 2 lesser experienced persons? (I'm not being aggressive here, I just wonder how this really works out) (you knew the rest of the group was going to sit back and do armchair

RE: [OT] We need a senior developer ASAP!

2013-12-02 Thread Ken Schaefer
Presumably a more experienced/skilled developer is more productive, and will thus produce greater value per day, and hence can be paid more. Vice-versa if you’re less experienced, or don’t have the specific skillset mentioned. Seems pretty simple to me. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com

Re: [OT] We need a senior developer ASAP!

2013-12-02 Thread Arjang Assadi
Mike, I don't think anyone really knows how it really works, everything is dynamic, 2 people who have the same experience would be wanting more or less depending on how many kids they have, mortgage etc. Also 2xless experienced developers could be worst than 1xexperienced developer, but twice the

WP8 - File manager/explorer?

2013-12-02 Thread ILT (O)
Is there a file explorer / file manager available for WP8, Nokia Lumia flavour (820-920-925-etc)? I know that it's easy to connect via their USB cable to a Windows PC and do it, but I am looking for something that runs on the device itself. _ Ian Thomas Victoria Park, Western Australia

Re: [OT] We need a senior developer ASAP!

2013-12-02 Thread Stephen Price
You are assuming of course that everyone are paid exactly what they are worth. This is part of it but there is also an element of market here. ie buyer negotiates with seller and if a price agreement is met then a sale (employment) takes place. Some people negotiate better (to their financial

Re: [OT] We need a senior developer ASAP!

2013-12-02 Thread mike smith
Or if you're already employed. You need to pay a lot more to attract someone that's happy with their current job. (to account for the tax bracket, etc) But yes, essentially it is bartering, and the first person to pick a number loses. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Stephen Price

Re: [OT] We need a senior developer ASAP!

2013-12-02 Thread Wallace Turner
(sry to the original poster whos thread is now hijacked) and the first person to pick a number loses. how does that work? they ask you what you want, you say it and they agree to that level. Everyone *can* be happy and no one 'loses' On 3/12/2013 12:38 PM, mike smith wrote: Or if you're

Re: [OT] We need a senior developer ASAP!

2013-12-02 Thread Craig van Nieuwkerk
I tend to agree. If you have a number in mind just tell them what it is. If you try and bargain you down just say no thanks and walk. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Wallace Turner wallacetur...@gmail.comwrote: (sry to the original poster whos thread is now hijacked) and the first person