Of Greg Keogh
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 7:35 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: SQLite déjà vu again
Well, it's not all hugs and puppies, as BrightstarDB failed my very first test
to use it in a real application. Its Entity Framework like layer does not
support Guid properties
Does NoSQL = NoDBA?
https://www.simple-talk.com/opinion/opinion-pieces/does-nosql--nodba
Ah yes, a different type of DBA will evolve.
From my reading, the absence of (a wider range of) typed data fields for
NoSQL databases is probably because of their irrelevance - and the absence
of
On 30 October 2014 19:19, osjasonrobe...@gmail.com wrote:
BrightstarDB - http://brightstardb.com/ may be of interest…
After fiddling with this for half an hour I'm starting to think this
product is a work of art! It's pleasing to discover a managed product that
is well thought-out, elegantly
Well, it's not all hugs and puppies, as BrightstarDB failed my very first
test to use it in a real application. Its Entity Framework like layer does
not support Guid properties. This is utterly inconceivable and unexpected,
and it renders the library completely useless to me. I have posted into
Is it SQLite that is the nightmare, or ADO?
It's a combination, but I perhaps blame SQLite a bit more because they lag
behind but eventually catch-up with dependent tools and frameworks.
You might do better running ODBC. Less layers, more independence..
Hmm, I'm not sure of the
BrightstarDB - http://brightstardb.com/ may be of interest…
Jason Roberts
Journeyman Software Developer
Twitter: @robertsjason
Blog: http://DontCodeTired.com
Pluralsight Courses: http://bit.ly/psjasonroberts
===
I welcome VSRE
Is it SQLite that is the nightmare, or ADO? You might do better running
ODBC. Less layers, more independence..
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Greg Keogh g...@mira.net wrote:
Folks, I've used SQLite in managed projects a few times over the previous
years and it's always been a nightmare to
