RE: CQWP: page fields and list fields

2015-01-18 Thread Paul Noone
I would suggest using 4 separate web parts and then grouping them into a single 
tab group using jQuery and other solutions out there.

What RTF is the “free text” coming from? Do you mean list fields?

Regards,

Paul

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
Ajay
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:19 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: CQWP: page fields and list fields

Hi Guys,

SharePoint 2013 on premise.

I have to create a CQWP with four tabs.

Three tabs will have free text, coming from Rich text field, apart from one tab 
which will come from custom list.

Client has existing SharePoint list of pricing which we want to use in one the 
tabs which is pricing tab.

Now, my question is, if I add three TextBoxes on the page which has CQWP in the 
edit panel and in query for CQWP point it to pricing list,

Will the XSL able to read from in page fields and also the values coming from 
the query? Will it work?



Ideally we would not like to add columns of type Publishing HTML in the pricing 
list.

Thanks,
Ajay



__
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
__

The content of this email is confidential to the intended recipient at the 
email address to which it has been addressed. It may not be disclosed to, or 
used by, anyone other than this addressee, nor may it be copied in any way. If 
received in error, please contact the author and then delete the message from 
your system. 
Please note that neither Keller Australia nor the sender accepts any 
responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the email and 
attachments (if any).
Visit http://www.keller.com.au/ for more information. 


This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by 
MailMarshal 

___
Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint - 
http://www.infotext.com/
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

CQWP: page fields and list fields

2015-01-11 Thread Ajay
Hi Guys,

SharePoint 2013 on premise.

I have to create a CQWP with four tabs.

Three tabs will have free text, coming from Rich text field, apart from one
tab which will come from custom list.

Client has existing SharePoint list of pricing which we want to use in one
the tabs which is pricing tab.

Now, my question is, if I add three TextBoxes on the page which has CQWP in
the edit panel and in query for CQWP point it to pricing list,

Will the XSL able to read from in page fields and also the values coming
from the query? Will it work?



Ideally we would not like to add columns of type Publishing HTML in the
pricing list.

Thanks,
Ajay
___
Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint - 
http://www.infotext.com/
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

Re: CQWP

2015-01-11 Thread Ajay
Hi Nigel,
Thanks, i was getting extra characters fp-tablecell etc on dev environment
few days back.
It's interesting to know that it works well for you, I will check that
again.

Cheers
Ajay

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Nigel Witherdin nigel_wither...@hotmail.com
 wrote:

 What's the junk that gets added if you have the html outside of the
 xsl:text tags?

 I don't think I see any extra stuff in my CQWPs - underneath the div for
 the webpart (class=ms-WPBody) I just see the html defined in my main,
 header and item xsl files

 Sent from my iPhone

  On 9 Jan 2015, at 12:17 pm, Ajay akhanna...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi Guys,
  Hope you had and are having good break.
 
  I have content query web part with lots of html and some dynamic values
 coming from the roll-up pages.
 
  If I just write the html in xsl, some junk is getting added to it, and
 if I wrap it in xsl:text than it does not change my markup which is ideal.
 
   I have many dynamic values, so do I have keep on writing like below..
 or is there a better way
 
 
 
xsl:text disable-output-escaping=yes![CDATA[
  div class=section-mobile-logo visible-xs
   img class=section-mobile-logo-img img-responsive
 ]]/xsl:textsrc={substring-before(substring-after(@ProductExpandEmblem1,'src='),
 '')}
xsl:text disable-output-escaping=yes![CDATA[ alt= width=100/
  /div
  ]]/xsl:text
 
  I havent started on it, but its a very long page with lots of markup and
 client wants to use CQWP only.
 
  ___
  Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint -
 http://www.infotext.com/
  ozmoss mailing list
  ozmoss@ozmoss.com
  http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
 ___
 Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint -
 http://www.infotext.com/
 ozmoss mailing list
 ozmoss@ozmoss.com
 http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

___
Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint - 
http://www.infotext.com/
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

CQWP

2015-01-08 Thread Ajay
Hi Guys,
Hope you had and are having good break.

I have content query web part with lots of html and some dynamic values
coming from the roll-up pages.

If I just write the html in xsl, some junk is getting added to it, and if I
wrap it in xsl:text than it does not change my markup which is ideal.

 I have many dynamic values, so do I have keep on writing like below.. or
is there a better way



  xsl:text disable-output-escaping=yes![CDATA[
div class=section-mobile-logo visible-xs
 img class=section-mobile-logo-img img-responsive
 
]]/xsl:textsrc={substring-before(substring-after(@ProductExpandEmblem1,'src=quot;'),
'quot;')}
  xsl:text disable-output-escaping=yes![CDATA[ alt= width=100/
/div
]]/xsl:text

I havent started on it, but its a very long page with lots of markup and
client wants to use CQWP only.
___
Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint - 
http://www.infotext.com/
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

Re: CQWP

2015-01-08 Thread Nigel Witherdin
What's the junk that gets added if you have the html outside of the xsl:text 
tags?

I don't think I see any extra stuff in my CQWPs - underneath the div for the 
webpart (class=ms-WPBody) I just see the html defined in my main, header and 
item xsl files

Sent from my iPhone

 On 9 Jan 2015, at 12:17 pm, Ajay akhanna...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Guys,
 Hope you had and are having good break.
 
 I have content query web part with lots of html and some dynamic values 
 coming from the roll-up pages.
 
 If I just write the html in xsl, some junk is getting added to it, and if I 
 wrap it in xsl:text than it does not change my markup which is ideal.
 
  I have many dynamic values, so do I have keep on writing like below.. or is 
 there a better way
 
 
 
   xsl:text disable-output-escaping=yes![CDATA[
 div class=section-mobile-logo visible-xs
  img class=section-mobile-logo-img img-responsive  
 ]]/xsl:textsrc={substring-before(substring-after(@ProductExpandEmblem1,'src=quot;'),
  'quot;')} 
   xsl:text disable-output-escaping=yes![CDATA[ alt= width=100/
 /div
 ]]/xsl:text
 
 I havent started on it, but its a very long page with lots of markup and 
 client wants to use CQWP only.
 
 ___
 Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint - 
 http://www.infotext.com/
 ozmoss mailing list
 ozmoss@ozmoss.com
 http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
___
Sponsored by Infotext - Amazing Search for Microsoft SharePoint - 
http://www.infotext.com/
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


Site template with CQWP

2012-12-05 Thread Ajay
On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want to
display the pages (filtered on  content type) and sub-sites.

CQWP will be way to go?  Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other
approach. will be better

I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go
will be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use
that template for all new sites.. ?
___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


RE: Site template with CQWP

2012-12-05 Thread Ishai Sagi
NEVER save sites as templates. Instead, develop your own webtemplate, and use 
feature stapling to activate publishing features and implement custom features.


[Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD Logos\Extelligent logo 
no text.jpg]Ishai Sagi | Solutions Architect
0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.aumailto:is...@exd.com.au | 
www.sharepoint-tips.comhttp://www.sharepoint-tips.com/ | 
@ishaisagihttp://twitter.com/ishaisagi | MVP 
Profilehttps://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
Ajay
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012 7:49 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: Site template with CQWP

On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want to 
display the pages (filtered on  content type) and sub-sites.

CQWP will be way to go?  Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other 
approach. will be better

I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go will 
be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use that 
template for all new sites.. ?
inline: image001.jpginline: image002.jpg___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


Re: Site template with CQWP

2012-12-05 Thread Web Admin
Yes. Provision a homepage and add your configured CQWPs via feature
receiver.

I have code samples if you require from all the time I spent working out
how to properly configure that wretched web part. :)


On 6 December 2012 08:17, Ishai Sagi is...@exd.com.au wrote:

  NEVER save sites as templates. Instead, develop your own webtemplate,
 and use feature stapling to activate publishing features and implement
 custom features.

 ** **

 ** **

 **[image: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD
 Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]***Ishai Sagi* | Solutions Architect
 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au | www.sharepoint-tips.com | 
 @ishaisagihttp://twitter.com/ishaisagi
 | MVP Profile https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai  

 ** **

 *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Ajay
 *Sent:* Thursday, 6 December 2012 7:49 AM
 *To:* ozMOSS
 *Subject:* Site template with CQWP

 ** **

 On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want
 to display the pages (filtered on  content type) and sub-sites.

 ** **

 CQWP will be way to go?  Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other
 approach. will be better

 ** **

 I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go
 will be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use
 that template for all new sites.. ?

 ___
 ozmoss mailing list
 ozmoss@ozmoss.com
 http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss




-- 
Regards,

Paul Noone

SharePoint Farm Admin/Developer
Infrastructure Team
CEO Sydney

p: (02) 9568 8461
f: (02) 9568 8483
e: paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.au
w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/
image002.jpg___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


RE: Site template with CQWP

2012-12-05 Thread Ishai Sagi
It works fine until it doesn't. also, when you move between farms, or if you 
uninstall a feature in the farm, it will stop working. Also - Microsoft states 
that you are not supposed to save site as template for publishing sites.


[Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD Logos\Extelligent logo 
no text.jpg]Ishai Sagi | Solutions Architect
0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.aumailto:is...@exd.com.au | 
www.sharepoint-tips.comhttp://www.sharepoint-tips.com/ | 
@ishaisagihttp://twitter.com/ishaisagi | MVP 
Profilehttps://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
Ajay
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012 8:38 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: Re: Site template with CQWP

Thanks guys, will follow the web-template approach. as this is a big project 
and want to do things the right way.

I remember some time back, I created a workflow activity provisioning of 
project sites at a client, and they gave me saved site as template, which I 
referenced in code, the new site which were getting created by workflow, worked 
fine.


Cheers Paul, will be great to have your samples, once I start on this, will 
ping you.

Thanks,,
Ajay
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Web Admin 
web.ad...@syd.catholic.edu.aumailto:web.ad...@syd.catholic.edu.au wrote:
Yes. Provision a homepage and add your configured CQWPs via feature receiver.

I have code samples if you require from all the time I spent working out how to 
properly configure that wretched web part. :)

On 6 December 2012 08:17, Ishai Sagi 
is...@exd.com.aumailto:is...@exd.com.au wrote:
NEVER save sites as templates. Instead, develop your own webtemplate, and use 
feature stapling to activate publishing features and implement custom features.


[Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD Logos\Extelligent logo 
no text.jpg]Ishai Sagi | Solutions Architect
0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.aumailto:is...@exd.com.au | 
www.sharepoint-tips.comhttp://www.sharepoint-tips.com/ | 
@ishaisagihttp://twitter.com/ishaisagi | MVP 
Profilehttps://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.commailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com 
[mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.commailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf 
Of Ajay
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012 7:49 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: Site template with CQWP

On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want to 
display the pages (filtered on  content type) and sub-sites.

CQWP will be way to go?  Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other 
approach. will be better

I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go will 
be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use that 
template for all new sites.. ?

___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.commailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss



--
Regards,

Paul Noone

SharePoint Farm Admin/Developer
Infrastructure Team
CEO Sydney

p: (02) 9568 8461tel:%2802%29%209568%208461
f: (02) 9568 8483tel:%2802%29%209568%208483
e: paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.aumailto:paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.au
w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/


___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.commailto:ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

inline: image001.jpginline: image003.jpginline: image004.jpg___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


Re: Site template with CQWP

2012-12-05 Thread Ajay
True you are right, web template will be the correct approach; as this will
move from dev to uat to prod.

I think save site as template, does not even show up for publishing site.

Your help/comments are much appreciated.

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Ishai Sagi is...@exd.com.au wrote:

  It works fine until it doesn’t. also, when you move between farms, or if
 you uninstall a feature in the farm, it will stop working. Also – Microsoft
 states that you are not supposed to save site as template for publishing
 sites.

 ** **

 ** **

 **[image: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD
 Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]***Ishai Sagi* | Solutions Architect
 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au | www.sharepoint-tips.com | 
 @ishaisagihttp://twitter.com/ishaisagi
 | MVP Profile https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai  

 ** **

 *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Ajay
 *Sent:* Thursday, 6 December 2012 8:38 AM
 *To:* ozMOSS
 *Subject:* Re: Site template with CQWP

 ** **

 Thanks guys, will follow the web-template approach. as this is a big
 project and want to do things the right way.

 ** **

 I remember some time back, I created a workflow activity provisioning of
 project sites at a client, and they gave me saved site as template, which
 I referenced in code, the new site which were getting created by workflow,
 worked fine. 

 ** **

 ** **

 Cheers Paul, will be great to have your samples, once I start on this,
 will ping you.

 ** **

 Thanks,,

 Ajay

 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Web Admin web.ad...@syd.catholic.edu.au
 wrote:

 Yes. Provision a homepage and add your configured CQWPs via feature
 receiver.

 ** **

 I have code samples if you require from all the time I spent working out
 how to properly configure that wretched web part. :)

 ** **

 On 6 December 2012 08:17, Ishai Sagi is...@exd.com.au wrote:

   NEVER save sites as templates. Instead, develop your own webtemplate,
 and use feature stapling to activate publishing features and implement
 custom features.

  

  

 **[image: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD
 Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]***Ishai Sagi* | Solutions Architect
 0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.au | www.sharepoint-tips.com | 
 @ishaisagihttp://twitter.com/ishaisagi
 | MVP Profile https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai  

  

 *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Ajay
 *Sent:* Thursday, 6 December 2012 7:49 AM
 *To:* ozMOSS
 *Subject:* Site template with CQWP

  

 On landing page of a site (built in SP 2010 publishing template), I want
 to display the pages (filtered on  content type) and sub-sites.

  

 CQWP will be way to go?  Will require 2 CQWP on the page,, or some other
 approach. will be better

  

 I will have to create more than 50 of these similar sub-sites; way to go
 will be to create and configure a site, save it as template and then use
 that template for all new sites.. ?

 ** **

 ___
 ozmoss mailing list
 ozmoss@ozmoss.com
 http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss



 

 ** **

 -- 

 Regards,

 ** **

 Paul Noone

 ** **

 SharePoint Farm Admin/Developer
 Infrastructure Team
 CEO Sydney

 p: (02) 9568 8461
 f: (02) 9568 8483
 e: paul.no...@syd.catholic.edu.au
 w: http://www.ceosyd.catholic.edu.au/

 ** **


 ___
 ozmoss mailing list
 ozmoss@ozmoss.com
 http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

  ** **

 ___
 ozmoss mailing list
 ozmoss@ozmoss.com
 http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


image003.jpgimage004.jpg___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


CQWP (Custom Styles) Not included in Save Site As Template

2012-11-19 Thread Nigel Witherdin

Hi All,
I have created a few CQWP custom styles, that are packaged as part of a 
solution where the XSL's are deployed to the site/Style Library/XSL Style 
Sheets/folder, and a modified .webpart file is deployed to the web part 
gallery referencing these styles. All this works great, and I now have a nice 
jQuery slider and a jQuery accordion.
However, when I add this web part to a page, and then save the site as template 
(including content), this customized CQWP is not created on the pages on the 
newly created site - even when the site is created within the same site 
colleciton (i.e. so there can be no doubt the web parts exist in the gallery 
with the expected IDs etc.).
I have exported the site template WSP to Studio and had a look at the 
SitePages elements.xml, and I can see the webpart is referenced correctly:
AllUsersWebPart WebPartOrder=2 WebPartZoneID=wpz 
ID=g_82de79b2_c4a3_4546_9d57_72ae552e3c1b![CDATA[webParts  webPart 
xmlns=http://schemas.microsoft.com/WebPart/v3;metaData  type 
name=Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart, 
Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, 
PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c /  importErrorMessageCannot import this 
Web Part./importErrorMessage/metaDatadata  properties   
 property name=GroupBy type=stringProjectProperty.Title/property
property name=FilterValue2 type=stringCompleted/property
property name=BaseType type=string /property name=AllowConnect 
type=boolTrue/propertyproperty name=ShowUntargetedItems 
type=boolFalse/propertyproperty name=DisplayName type=string 
/property name=Title type=stringMy Tasks/property
property name=ContentTypeName type=string /property 
name=ViewFlag type=string0/propertyproperty 
name=MediaPlayerStyleSource type=string null=true /property 
name=AdditionalGroupAndSortFields type=string /property 
name=GroupByDirection 
type=Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart+SortDirection,
 Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, 
PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429cAsc/propertyproperty 
name=GroupByFieldType type=string /property 
name=FilterOperator1 
type=Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart+FilterFieldQueryOperator,
 Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, 
PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429cEq/propertyproperty 
name=FeedTitle type=string /property name=FilterOperator3 
type=Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart+FilterFieldQueryOperator,
 Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, 
PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429cEq/propertyproperty 
name=SortByDirection 
type=Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart+SortDirection,
 Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, 
PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429cAsc/propertyproperty 
name=FilterDisplayValue3 type=string /property 
name=FilterDisplayValue2 type=stringCompleted/propertyproperty 
name=FilterDisplayValue1 type=string[Me]/propertyproperty 
name=FilterValue3 type=string /property name=DataMappings 
type=stringDescription:{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247},Title,Text;|SipAddress:|Title:|OpenInNewWindow:|ImageUrl:|LinkUrl:|LinkToolTip:|/property
property name=ListGuid type=string /property 
name=ListUrl type=string null=true /property 
name=FilterValue1 type=string[Me]/propertyproperty 
name=CacheXslStorage type=boolTrue/propertyproperty 
name=MissingAssembly type=stringCannot import this Web Part./property
property name=ItemLimit type=int-1/propertyproperty 
name=DataMappingViewFields 
type=string{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247},Text;/property
property name=XslLink type=string null=true /property 
name=DataColumnRenames type=string /property name=AllowMinimize 
type=boolTrue/propertyproperty name=ContentTypeBeginsWithId 
type=string0x0108/propertyproperty name=ListDisplayName 
type=string null=true /property name=ListsOverride 
type=string /property name=ItemXslLink type=string/mkt/Style 
Library/Xsl Style Sheets/Accordion/ItemStyle.xsl/propertyproperty 
name=Height type=string /property name=SortBy 
type=string{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}/property
property name=CatalogIconImageUrl type=string /property 
name=Default type=string /property name=FilterType1 
type=stringUser/propertyproperty name=FireInitialRow 
type=boolTrue/propertyproperty name=AsyncRefresh 
type=boolFalse/propertyproperty name=ItemStyle 
type=stringAccordionCreateLinkToItem/propertyproperty 
name=AdditionalFilterFields type=string /property name=WebUrl 
type=string~sitecollection

Re: CQWP (Custom Styles) Not included in Save Site As Template

2012-11-19 Thread Web Admin
Have you opened the page in web part maintenance view to see if it's
present at all?


On 20 November 2012 10:31, Nigel Witherdin nigel_wither...@hotmail.comwrote:

  Hi All,

 I have created a few CQWP custom styles, that are packaged as part of a
 solution where the XSL's are deployed to the site/Style Library/XSL Style
 Sheets/folder, and a modified .webpart file is deployed to the web part
 gallery referencing these styles. All this works great, and I now have a
 nice jQuery slider and a jQuery accordion.

 However, when I add this web part to a page, and then save the site as
 template (including content), this customized CQWP is not created on the
 pages on the newly created site - even when the site is created within the
 same site colleciton (i.e. so there can be no doubt the web parts exist in
 the gallery with the expected IDs etc.).

 I have exported the site template WSP to Studio and had a look at the
 SitePages elements.xml, and I can see the webpart is referenced correctly:

 AllUsersWebPart WebPartOrder=2 WebPartZoneID=wpz
 ID=g_82de79b2_c4a3_4546_9d57_72ae552e3c1b![CDATA[webParts
   webPart xmlns=http://schemas.microsoft.com/WebPart/v3;
 metaData
   type
 name=Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart,
 Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
 PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c /
   importErrorMessageCannot import this Web Part./importErrorMessage
 /metaData
 data
   properties
 property name=GroupBy
 type=stringProjectProperty.Title/property
 property name=FilterValue2 type=stringCompleted/property
 property name=BaseType type=string /
 property name=AllowConnect type=boolTrue/property
 property name=ShowUntargetedItems type=boolFalse/property
 property name=DisplayName type=string /
 property name=Title type=stringMy Tasks/property
 property name=ContentTypeName type=string /
 property name=ViewFlag type=string0/property
 property name=MediaPlayerStyleSource type=string null=true
 /
 property name=AdditionalGroupAndSortFields type=string /
 property name=GroupByDirection
 type=Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart+SortDirection,
 Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
 PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429cAsc/property
 property name=GroupByFieldType type=string /
 property name=FilterOperator1
 type=Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart+FilterFieldQueryOperator,
 Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
 PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429cEq/property
 property name=FeedTitle type=string /
 property name=FilterOperator3
 type=Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart+FilterFieldQueryOperator,
 Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
 PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429cEq/property
 property name=SortByDirection
 type=Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart+SortDirection,
 Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing, Version=14.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
 PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429cAsc/property
 property name=FilterDisplayValue3 type=string /
 property name=FilterDisplayValue2
 type=stringCompleted/property
 property name=FilterDisplayValue1 type=string[Me]/property
 property name=FilterValue3 type=string /
 property name=DataMappings
 type=stringDescription:{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247},Title,Text;|SipAddress:|Title:|OpenInNewWindow:|ImageUrl:|LinkUrl:|LinkToolTip:|/property
 property name=ListGuid type=string /
 property name=ListUrl type=string null=true /
 property name=FilterValue1 type=string[Me]/property
 property name=CacheXslStorage type=boolTrue/property
 property name=MissingAssembly type=stringCannot import this
 Web Part./property
 property name=ItemLimit type=int-1/property
 property name=DataMappingViewFields
 type=string{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247},Text;/property
 property name=XslLink type=string null=true /
 property name=DataColumnRenames type=string /
 property name=AllowMinimize type=boolTrue/property
 property name=ContentTypeBeginsWithId
 type=string0x0108/property
 property name=ListDisplayName type=string null=true /
 property name=ListsOverride type=string /
 property name=ItemXslLink type=string/mkt/Style Library/Xsl
 Style Sheets/Accordion/ItemStyle.xsl/property
 property name=Height type=string /
 property name=SortBy
 type=string{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}/property
 property name=CatalogIconImageUrl type=string /
 property name=Default type=string /
 property name=FilterType1 type=stringUser/property
 property name=FireInitialRow type=boolTrue/property

Sharepoint 2010, CQWP, and RSS links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-07-04 Thread Specker, Caroline
I have come across an issue either with SharePoint 2010 or my brain and am not 
convinced which one has the problem.

I have a simple links list with URL and Notes columns.  I am displaying the 
items in this list in a CQWP and in Fields to Display I have Link set to URL 
[Custom Columns] and Title set to Notes.

This works as expected on the page but the RSS feed renders the link as the url 
AND the description, eg 
www.google.com.au%2520http/www.google.com.auhttp://www.google.com.au%2520http/www.google.com.au.

Am I going mad or is it SharePoint?  Anyone got a workaround that doesn't 
involve modifying the xslt (which I can do if I absolutely have to but would 
rather not)?

Cheers,
Caroline

*
The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments to it,
is intended for the use of the addressee and is confidential.  If you
are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, read,
forward, copy or retain any of the information.  If you received this
e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender by return
e-mail or telephone.

The Commonwealth does not warrant that any attachments are free
from viruses or any other defects.  You assume all liability for any
loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening
or using the attachments.

The security of emails transmitted in an unencrypted environment
cannot be guaranteed. By forwarding or replying to this email, you
acknowledge and accept these risks.
*

___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


RE: Sharepoint 2010, CQWP, and RSS links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-07-04 Thread Ishai Sagi
Looks like the xslt is using the value of the URL field, which consists of the 
URL and the title, separated by a coma and a space. I have on my blog somewhere 
an example on how to teach the CQWP to show links properly- by changing the XSL 
- so you can use that.


[Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD 
Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]Ishai Sagi | Solutions Architect
0488 789 786 | is...@exd.com.aumailto:is...@exd.com.au | 
www.sharepoint-tips.comhttp://www.sharepoint-tips.com/ | 
@ishaisagihttp://twitter.com/ishaisagi | MVP 
Profilehttps://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Ishai

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
Specker, Caroline
Sent: Thursday, 5 July 2012 10:57
To: 'ozMOSS'
Subject: Sharepoint 2010, CQWP, and RSS links [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Description: Description: Description: C:\Users\Brian\Pictures\EXD 
Logos\Extelligent logo no text.jpg]
I have come across an issue either with SharePoint 2010 or my brain and am not 
convinced which one has the problem.

I have a simple links list with URL and Notes columns.  I am displaying the 
items in this list in a CQWP and in Fields to Display I have Link set to URL 
[Custom Columns] and Title set to Notes.

This works as expected on the page but the RSS feed renders the link as the url 
AND the description, eg 
www.google.com.au%2520http/www.google.com.auhttp://www.google.com.au%2520http/www.google.com.au.

Am I going mad or is it SharePoint?  Anyone got a workaround that doesn't 
involve modifying the xslt (which I can do if I absolutely have to but would 
rather not)?

Cheers,
Caroline

*
The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments to it,
is intended for the use of the addressee and is confidential.  If you
are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, read,
forward, copy or retain any of the information.  If you received this
e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender by return
e-mail or telephone.

The Commonwealth does not warrant that any attachments are free
from viruses or any other defects.  You assume all liability for any
loss, damage or other consequences which may arise from opening
or using the attachments.

The security of emails transmitted in an unencrypted environment
cannot be guaranteed. By forwarding or replying to this email, you
acknowledge and accept these risks.
*
inline: image001.jpginline: image002.jpg___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP

2010-02-16 Thread etmilis
Hi Paul,

 

What I am referring is the U2U WinForm app, not the webpart.

 

Thanks for this, this is gold.

Will install it and check it out.

 

Cheers,

etmilis

 

 

From: paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au.akapost.com
[mailto:paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au.akapost.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 17 February 2010 8:47 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP

 

U2U CAML Query feature handles recursion and also let's you specify a
specific folder to search within.

 



 

Regards,

 

Paul

Online Developer, ICT

CEO Sydney

 

-Original Message-
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf
Of Chris Milne
Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 2:53 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP

 

Hoi hoi,

 

This may do the trick for recursion for you;

 

spQueryObject.ViewAttributes = Scope='Recursive';

 

As for pulling out the CAML, I recall someone mentioning something like

that here a while ago but I don't recall the specifics.

 

C

 

-Original Message-

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On

Behalf Of etmi...@akapost.com

Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 1:49 PM

To: 'ozMOSS'

Subject: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP

 

Hi everyone,

 

Is there a way or ways to peep into or get the CAML query from out of

the

box content query web part?

 

I have been playing with CAML query and I can see some grey hairs

growing

immediately :-)

 

The reason I ask is, I am maintaining a web part developed by someone

and

need to modify/overwrite the caml query.

 

I can get what I want using the OOTB CQWP but I want the actual CAML

query.

 

 

I have tried using U2U CAML query builder but still have no luck since

the

query needs to be RECURSVIE and I don't think U2U supports it yet.

 

 

Thanks,

etmilis

 

___

ozmoss mailing list

ozmoss@ozmoss.com

http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

 

___

ozmoss mailing list

ozmoss@ozmoss.com

http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

image001.jpg___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP

2010-02-15 Thread Paul Turner
From memory I think if you set your logs to 'Verbose' it will be logged.

Paul T.

-Original Message-
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
etmi...@akapost.com
Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 2:19 PM
To: 'ozMOSS'
Subject: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP

Hi everyone,

Is there a way or ways to peep into or get the CAML query from out of the
box content query web part?

I have been playing with CAML query and I can see some grey hairs growing
immediately :-)

The reason I ask is, I am maintaining a web part developed by someone and
need to modify/overwrite the caml query.

I can get what I want using the OOTB CQWP but I want the actual CAML query.


I have tried using U2U CAML query builder but still have no luck since the
query needs to be RECURSVIE and I don't think U2U supports it yet.


Thanks,
etmilis

___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss
___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


RE: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP

2010-02-15 Thread Chris Milne
Hoi hoi,

This may do the trick for recursion for you;

spQueryObject.ViewAttributes = Scope='Recursive';

As for pulling out the CAML, I recall someone mentioning something like
that here a while ago but I don't recall the specifics.

C

-Original Message-
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On
Behalf Of etmi...@akapost.com
Sent: Tuesday, 16 February 2010 1:49 PM
To: 'ozMOSS'
Subject: Peeping into CAML Query from CQWP

Hi everyone,

Is there a way or ways to peep into or get the CAML query from out of
the
box content query web part?

I have been playing with CAML query and I can see some grey hairs
growing
immediately :-)

The reason I ask is, I am maintaining a web part developed by someone
and
need to modify/overwrite the caml query.

I can get what I want using the OOTB CQWP but I want the actual CAML
query.


I have tried using U2U CAML query builder but still have no luck since
the
query needs to be RECURSVIE and I don't think U2U supports it yet.


Thanks,
etmilis

___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss

___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


RE: CQWP in 2010

2010-01-28 Thread Jason Taylor
I can see the point about multiple content databases, but they could have at 
least allowed a query against another site collection (one at a time). This 
would save many people having to resort to 3rd party tools or custom 
development.

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
Jeremy Thake
Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 6:59 PM
To: paul.culm...@sevensigma.com.au; ozMOSS
Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010

With the new Developer Dashboard, if you did put a web part on a page that did 
a cross site collection query...you'd be able to see the timings on the page 
based on what object model calls were happening.

Would be interesting, but Paul is correct...hopping between two site 
collections means two databases which results in taking the data up into the 
application server memory and joining the data there. Maybe that's what the 
64-bit minimum requirement and min 6GB RAM is for ;-)

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
Paul Culmsee
Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:40 PM
To: 'ozMOSS'
Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010

Thats an architectural limitation of content databases. When you think about 
it, crossing site collections is actually quite inefficient because its two 
separate underlying SQL databases. I'd be very interested indeed just to see 
how expensive SDK based cross site collection queries are at a DB level. Ie 
slap on the lightning conductor web part, pull some data and to a sql trace. 
Perhaps the numbers have been crunched somewhere - I've not gone looking.

Regards

Paul

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
Jason Taylor
Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:36 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010

Looking at the query scope settings they look exactly the same as 2007, 
allowing only site collection, sites  sub-sites or a list. Unless there is 
something under the hood it doesn't look like you can.

Cheers,

Jason Taylor
SAGE Automation

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
Paul Noone
Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: CQWP in 2010

Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced 
to allow cross-site querying?

Regards,

Paul
Online Developer, ICT
CEO Sydney


Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian 
Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize'

Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the 
use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain 
legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or 
disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error 
please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without 
making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. 
It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against 
viruses and other damage.

Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and Australian 
Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize'


Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the 
use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain 
legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying, modification or 
disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error 
please immediately advise us by return e-mail and delete the document without 
making a copy. No warranty is made that any attachments are free from viruses. 
It is the recipient's responsibility to establish its own protection against 
viruses and other damage.
___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


CQWP in 2010

2010-01-27 Thread Paul Noone
Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced 
to allow cross-site querying?

Regards,

Paul
Online Developer, ICT
CEO Sydney

___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


RE: CQWP in 2010

2010-01-27 Thread Paul Turner
You mean cross-site collection??


Regards,

Paul Turner
Senior Solutions Specialist

M: 0412 748 168 P: 08 8238 0912 F: 08 8234 5966
A: 66 Henley Beach Road, Mile End SA 5031
E: paul.tur...@dws.com.aumailto:paul.tur...@dws.com.au  W: www.dws.com.au
[cid:image001.jpg@01CAA010.60023A00]
ADVANCED BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LTD

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only for 
the use of the person to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended 
recipient you have received this email in error and are requested to delete it 
immediately. Any opinion expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be that 
of DWS Pty Ltd.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of 
Paul Noone
Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: CQWP in 2010

Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been enhanced 
to allow cross-site querying?

Regards,

Paul
Online Developer, ICT
CEO Sydney

inline: image001.jpg___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss


RE: CQWP in 2010

2010-01-27 Thread Paul Culmsee
Thats an architectural limitation of content databases. When you think about
it, crossing site collections is actually quite inefficient because its two
separate underlying SQL databases. I'd be very interested indeed just to see
how expensive SDK based cross site collection queries are at a DB level. Ie
slap on the lightning conductor web part, pull some data and to a sql trace.
Perhaps the numbers have been crunched somewhere - I've not gone looking.

 

Regards

 

Paul

 

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf
Of Jason Taylor
Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 1:36 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: CQWP in 2010

 

Looking at the query scope settings they look exactly the same as 2007,
allowing only site collection, sites  sub-sites or a list. Unless there is
something under the hood it doesn't look like you can.

 

Cheers,

 

Jason Taylor

SAGE Automation

 

From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Noone
Sent: Thursday, 28 January 2010 10:40 AM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: CQWP in 2010

 

Can anyone confirm whether the Content Query Web Part in 2010 has been
enhanced to allow cross-site querying?

 

Regards,

Paul

Online Developer, ICT
CEO Sydney

 


Winner of a National Australian Human Resources Institute Award and
Australian Engineering Excellence Awards 2008 'Presidents Prize'

  _  

Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for
the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or
contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution,
copying, modification or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error please immediately advise us by return e-mail
and delete the document without making a copy. No warranty is made that any
attachments are free from viruses. It is the recipient's responsibility to
establish its own protection against viruses and other damage.

___
ozmoss mailing list
ozmoss@ozmoss.com
http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozmoss