Re: P5EE Status, was PAR and Apache::PAR
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Rob Nagler wrote: Rocco Caputo writes: I think it's not fair. Despite POE's widespread adoption by hobbyists and enterprises alike, I'm still not convinced it's ready for the Enterprise label. To be sure, I'd love to call POE P5EE Enterprise Certified or something, but not before its time. Unless there is a large marketing budget behind this, I really don't see the point. Your best bet is keeping a list of production systems that use POE with statistics about traffic and uptime. mod_perl does this (sort of), and it's clear it's enterprise ready. I don't think we need a big marketing budget. Simply providing some kind of standards with which to comply and howing what meets these standards and how - it will be useful to those attempting to choose or deploy perl in 'enterprise' environments - just being able to say 'this framework, meets these standards and if it dosn't fit, we can replace this part with this and it will still meet the standards' will be a boon for perl developers. regards, A.
Re: P5EE Status, was PAR and Apache::PAR
Stephen Adkins wrote: Here's the status of the P5EE Project: I continue to work on it, http://www.officevision.com/pub/p5ee/activity.html but alas, I have not made even an initial release of code worth talking about. (That's why I haven't been talking about it.) ;-) It's not being built specifically for P5EE, but OpenInteract 2 (a fairly major rewrite) should be out in a couple of months. I hope to give a talk on it at YAPC::NA but haven't heard yet about its acceptance. I plan on creating any necessary wrappers for P5EE compatibility as that becomes defined/worthwhile. OpenInteract now has a wiki site where you can learn more: http://openinteract.sourceforge.net/ Chris -- Chris Winters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Building enterprise-capable snack solutions since 1988.
Re: P5EE Status, was PAR and Apache::PAR
Rocco Caputo writes: I think it's not fair. Despite POE's widespread adoption by hobbyists and enterprises alike, I'm still not convinced it's ready for the Enterprise label. To be sure, I'd love to call POE P5EE Enterprise Certified or something, but not before its time. Unless there is a large marketing budget behind this, I really don't see the point. Your best bet is keeping a list of production systems that use POE with statistics about traffic and uptime. mod_perl does this (sort of), and it's clear it's enterprise ready. Rob
Re: P5EE Status, was PAR and Apache::PAR
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:42:29AM +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote: Is it fair to say that the Perl community at large has lost some interest in the P5EE label? If it was, wouldn't SOAP-Lite and POE and other engines that could be slapped with the Enterprise label be more interested in participating? It's possible that I have the wrong impression though. I welcome a correction in that impression. :) I think it's not fair. Despite POE's widespread adoption by hobbyists and enterprises alike, I'm still not convinced it's ready for the Enterprise label. To be sure, I'd love to call POE P5EE Enterprise Certified or something, but not before its time. That said, I'm perfectly willing to be disabused of this not-ready notion. -- Rocco Caputo - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://poe.perl.org/
