On 2013-09-17 16:25, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
Hello,
Thank for your reply Andreas, I set the multiplier to 1000, cut the
netword nothing append.
Well, the ping resource-agent updates the value on every monitor event
looking again on your configuration, guess what operation is
missing? ;-)
On 09/17/13 15:53, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-09-16T18:19:55, Gao,Yan y...@suse.com wrote:
1. Global property: operations-limit, operations-limit-migrate (alias
for migration-threshold)
How about to keep it migration-limit, and name the new property
On 2013-09-18T17:53:16, Gao,Yan y...@suse.com wrote:
actions-limit is a good name. (One of the three hard problems in
computer science! ;-)
(If we need it more fine grained at any point in the future, we can
always add class/provider/type/op elements to it.)
Been thinking how to
Hi all,
really nobody here with deeper experience of crm_simulate?
Or with a hint for good documentation?
Best regards
Andreas Mock
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andreas Mock [mailto:andreas.m...@web.de]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2013 13:38
An: 'The Pacemaker cluster resource
On 2013-09-18 15:08, Andreas Mock wrote:
Hi all,
really nobody here with deeper experience of crm_simulate?
Or with a hint for good documentation?
What Pacemaker version are you using? I did a quick test here on older
1.1.6 and 1.1.7 clusters and they show a nice output on crm_simulate
-Ls
Hello Andreas,
I do not see what is wrong in my config.
cib epoch=122 num_updates=0 admin_epoch=0
validate-with=pacemaker-1.2 crm_feature_set=3.0.6
update-origin=noeud2.apec.fr update-client=cibadmin
cib-last-written=Sat Sep 14 10:53:58 2013 have-quorum=1 dc-uuid=2
configuration
On 2013-09-18 15:44, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
Hello Andreas,
I do not see what is wrong in my config.
You have no monitor operation defined for your ping-gateway
resource, so in fact it does never execute the connectivity check but
only updates the pingd attriute value once on start.
Regards,
Hello Andreas,
I am testing serveur upgrade, I have one node with FC18
(pacemaker-1.1.9-0.1.70ad9fa.git.fc18.i686) and the other FC17
(pacemaker-1.1.7-2.fc17.i686).
Best regards.
Francis
On 09/18/2013 03:44 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
On 2013-09-18 15:08, Andreas Mock wrote:
Hi all,
really
Hello,
I take an example from Internet without monitor... Do you have a
suggestion ?
Best regards.
Francis
On 09/18/2013 03:54 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
On 2013-09-18 15:44, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
Hello Andreas,
I do not see what is wrong in my config.
You have no monitor operation
Hello,
I updated ping-gateway like this but nothing change...
primitive class=ocf id=ping-gateway provider=pacemaker
type=ping
instance_attributes id=ping-gateway-instance_attributes
nvpair id=ping-gateway-instance_attributes-host_list
name=host_list
On 2013-09-18 16:56, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
Hello,
I updated ping-gateway like this but nothing change...
Hmm ... well, there is still no monitor operation you only added some
more attributes.
Try:
crm configure monitor ping-gateway 20
... or the equivalent in your preferred cluster
Hi,
I have a question regarding the monitor operation on disabled nodes.
I noticed that this operation is called even, when an agent is disabled for
a node. Is it an indented behavior or is there something wrong with my
configuration?
Another question is, if it is intended, whether there is any
On 2013-09-18T11:13:46, Radoslaw Garbacz radoslaw.garb...@xtremedatainc.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding the monitor operation on disabled nodes.
I noticed that this operation is called even, when an agent is disabled for
a node. Is it an indented behavior or is there something
Sorry for not being specific.
The agent is meant to run only on a specific node (the head), and by
constraints is disabled on all other nodes.
'pcs constraint' reports:
Location Constraints:
Resource: dbx_nfs_head
Enabled on: ip-10-138-14-225
Disabled on: ip-10-151-14-34
Hi,
Seems like 'ocf_is_probe' is the right call in my case.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-09-18T11:13:46, Radoslaw Garbacz
radoslaw.garb...@xtremedatainc.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding the monitor operation on disabled
On 2013-09-18 16:26, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
Hello,
I take an example from Internet without monitor... Do you have a
suggestion ?
There are a lot of examples ... like this one http://goo.gl/ZfKZeq
Regards,
Andreas
--
Need help with Pacemaker?
http://www.hastexo.com/now
Best regards.
Am Mittwoch, 18. September 2013, 13:34:55 schrieb Jeff Weber:
I am looking to create a 2-node Active/Passive firewall cluster. I am an
experienced Linux user, but new to HA clusters. I have scanned Clusters
From Scratch and Pacemaker Explained. I found these docs helpful, but a
bit
Am Mittwoch, 18. September 2013, 14:55:21 schrieb Jeff Weber:
Michael:
Thanks. That helps me move forward.
(...)
I'm still a bit unclear on how the cluster monitors the VIP resources.
Do I have exactly one stanza of totem interface, and set the bindnetaddr to
the heartbeat net?
How does
Hallo Andreas,
thank you for your reply.
I use 1.1.11-git.
What I did: I put one node down (servive pacemaker stop) and then
execute a crm_simulate -Ls -u node and I only see the output
as said before. When I bring up the node in reality pacemaker
is moving resources to that node. The output of
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.com
wrote:
I'm still a bit unclear on how the cluster monitors the VIP resources.
Do I have exactly one stanza of totem interface, and set the bindnetaddr
to
the heartbeat net?
How does the cluster monitor for a
I have been using heartbeat for many years, but am now setting up some new
clusters with pacemaker/corosync. I'm not sure which component is having
problems so I'm sending to both lists.
These are two machine clusters, configured per the RHEL quickstart on
clusterlabs.org
I'm frequently
21 matches
Mail list logo
