Re: [Pacemaker] token lost - need clarification

2013-12-18 Thread Marco Felettigh
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:28:51 +0100 Michael Schwartzkopff m...@sys4.de wrote: Am Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2013, 09:17:31 schrieb ma...@nucleus.it: Hi to all, i set up a 2 node cluster with a cross cable between the two nodes without stonith ; i know this is not the best way but this is the

Re: [Pacemaker] lrmd segfault at pacemaker 1.1.11-rc1

2013-12-18 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, 2013/12/18 David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com: That's a really weird one... I don't see how it is possible for op-id to be NULL there. You might need to give valgrind a shot to detect whatever is really going on here. -- Vossel Thank you for advice. I try it. Kazunori INOUE

[Pacemaker] Question about node-action-limit and migration-limit

2013-12-18 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi, When I set only migration-limit without setting node-action-limit in pacemaker-1.1, the number of 'operation' other than migrate_to/from was limited to the value of migration-limit. (The node that I used has 8 cores.) [cib] property \ no-quorum-policy=freeze \ stonith-enabled=true \

[Pacemaker] again return code, now in crm_attribute

2013-12-18 Thread Andrey Groshev
Hi, Andrew and ALL. I'm sorry, but I again found an error. :) Crux of the problem: # crm_attribute --type crm_config --attr-name stonith-enabled --query; echo $? scope=crm_config name=stonith-enabled value=true 0 # crm_attribute --type crm_config --attr-name stonith-enabled --update firstval

[Pacemaker] Location / Colocation constraints issue

2013-12-18 Thread Gaëtan Slongo
Hi ! I'm currently building a 2 node cluster for firewalling. I would like to run a shorewall on both on the master and the Slave node. I tried many things but nothing works as expected. Shorewall configurations are good. What I want to do is to start shorewall standby on the other node as soon

[Pacemaker] question on resource colocation

2013-12-18 Thread Brusq, Jerome
Dear all, It is maybe a stupid question... Sorry I'm a new user of pacemaker. I have 2 nodes and 5 resources (resource1, resource2, resource3, resource4 and resource5). The 5 resources have to work together on the same node. I tried the feature group and colocation .. but I have always the same

Re: [Pacemaker] question on resource colocation

2013-12-18 Thread Florian Crouzat
Le 18/12/2013 17:20, Brusq, Jerome a écrit : Dear all, It is maybe a stupid question… Sorry I’m a new user of pacemaker. Not at all. I have 2 nodes and 5 resources (resource1, resource2, resource3, resource4 and resource5). The 5 resources have to work together on the same node. I tried

[Pacemaker] question on on-fail=restart

2013-12-18 Thread Brusq, Jerome
Dear all, I have a custom lsb script that launch a custom process. primitive myscript lsb:ha_swift \ op start interval=0 timeout=30s \ op stop interval=0 timeout=30s \ op monitor interval=15s on-fail=restart \ When this one crashes, I have the feeling that pacemaker do :

Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11

2013-12-18 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - From: David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 3:33:46 PM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11 - Original Message - From: Andrew

Re: [Pacemaker] question on on-fail=restart

2013-12-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 19 Dec 2013, at 4:03 am, Brusq, Jerome jerome.br...@signalis.com wrote: Dear all, I have a custom lsb script that launch a custom process. primitive myscript lsb:ha_swift \ op start interval=0 timeout=30s \ op stop interval=0 timeout=30s \ op monitor interval=15s

Re: [Pacemaker] Trouble building Pacemaker from source on CentOS 5.10

2013-12-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 14 Dec 2013, at 7:51 am, Stephane Robin sro...@kivasystems.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build Pacemaker-1.1.10 (from git), with corosync 2.3.2 and libqb 0.16.0 on a CentOS 5.10 64b system. I have latest auto tools (automake 1.14, autoconf 2.69, lib tool 2.4, pkg-config 0.27.1)

Re: [Pacemaker] crmsh: New syntax for location constraints, suggestions / comments

2013-12-18 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
18.12.2013 23:21, Rainer Brestan wrote: Hi Lars, maybe a little off topic. What i really miss in crmsh is the possibility to specify resource parameters which are different on different nodes, so the parameter is node dependant. In XML syntax this is existing, Andrew gave me the hint as

Re: [Pacemaker] Manual fence confirmation by stonith_admin doesn't work again.

2013-12-18 Thread Digimer
On 19/12/13 12:44 AM, Nikita Staroverov wrote: Hello! Some months ago i wrote about manual fence confirmation by stonith_admin -C. Andrew fixed this, but it works only for pacemaker+corosync. CMAN-based configuration won't do manual fencing this way. I tried stonith_admin -C , pacemaker made

Re: [Pacemaker] Manual fence confirmation by stonith_admin doesn't work again.

2013-12-18 Thread Digimer
Re-sending to keep this in the public archives. Please keep replies on the list, it benefits everyone that way. On 19/12/13 01:17 AM, Nikita Staroverov wrote: Some months ago i wrote about manual fence confirmation by stonith_admin -C. Andrew fixed this, but it works only for

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior of the post-failure during the migrate_to

2013-12-18 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, 2013/12/19 David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com: - Original Message - From: Kazunori INOUE kazunori.ino...@gmail.com To: pm pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 4:56:20 AM Subject: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior of the post-failure during the

Re: [Pacemaker] Manual fence confirmation by stonith_admin doesn't work again.

2013-12-18 Thread Nikita Staroverov
Please see: https://access.redhat.com/site/articles/36302 If you don't have an account, the relevant part is: Usage of fence_manual is not supported in any production cluster. You may use this fence agent for development or debugging purposes only. I wrote about fence_ack_manual, not