On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:41:20 +0300
Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
I would expect that only one option is modified, but crmsh intend to
remove all others.
May be it is possible to fix it by one-line crmsh patch?
Kristoffer, Dejan?
Best,
Vladislav
Hi,
This was
Hi Everyone,
First I want to wish everyone an happy new year.
I am trying figure out in which case I should be using a constraint
colocation or the resource group. At the end it look that both will result
in the same result, the resource will be running on the same host.
As an example I am
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 09:49:40 -0500
Luc Paulin paulins...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying figure out in which case I should be using a constraint
colocation or the resource group. At the end it look that both will
result in the same result, the resource will be running on the same
host.
As an
Thanx for quick reply,
That make sense to use the colocation. So I guess that I should define a
master resource and tell each other resource that they should colocated
on the same node at the master resource.
pcs constraint colocation add resourceA master_resource INFINITY
pcs constraint
On 2014-01-02T11:22:01, Luc Paulin paulins...@gmail.com wrote:
That make sense to use the colocation. So I guess that I should define a
master resource and tell each other resource that they should colocated
on the same node at the master resource.
You could also use a resource set to achieve
- Original Message -
From: Digimer li...@alteeve.ca
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2014 5:38:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker 1.1.10 + RHEL 7 beta issues
Is this a bug?
There's too much going on here
On 01/02/2014 10:37 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2014-01-02T11:22:01, Luc Paulin paulins...@gmail.com wrote:
That make sense to use the colocation. So I guess that I should define a
master resource and tell each other resource that they should colocated
on the same node at the master
Any way to form a single node cluster? I am evaluating pacemaker. Hope I
can do this with just single server.
John
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home:
02.01.2014 12:53, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:41:20 +0300
Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
I would expect that only one option is modified, but crmsh intend to
remove all others.
May be it is possible to fix it by one-line crmsh patch?
Kristoffer,
Thanx for the syntax, however it does not seem to work.
When I try it, it immediately return the help syntax menu, as if the
command not suported.
[root@fwcorp-01 (NEW FW HOST) ~]$pcs constraint colocation set vip_v253_178
vip_v253_179 vip_v253
Usage: pcs constraint [constraints]...
Manage
On 02/01/14 02:36 PM, John Wei wrote:
Any way to form a single node cluster? I am evaluating pacemaker. Hope I
can do this with just single server.
John
I'm not sure how much you can evaluate with just one node, but
technically, I see no reason why you couldn't. You would have to disable
- Original Message -
From: Digimer li...@alteeve.ca
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2014 2:03:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Forming single node cluster?
On 02/01/14 02:36 PM, John Wei wrote:
Any way to form a
On 01/02/2014 01:54 PM, Luc Paulin wrote:
Thanx for the syntax, however it does not seem to work.
When I try it, it immediately return the help syntax menu, as if the command not
suported.
[root@fwcorp-01 (NEW FW HOST) ~]$pcs constraint colocation set vip_v253_178
vip_v253_179 vip_v253
Which
$cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 6.4 (Final)
$rpm -qa | grep -i pcs
pcs-0.9.26-10.el6_4.1.noarch
So look like I might have an older version of pcs ..
--
!
( o o )
--oOO(_)OOo--
Luc Paulin
email:
Hi all,
While trying to test to answer questions from my previous thread, I
hit another problem. Since posting the first thread, I moved on in the
Cluster from Scratch tutorial and got to the point where I was running
Active/Active.
Here I have a couple of problems.
First up, the dlm
03.01.2014 07:46, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
While trying to test to answer questions from my previous thread, I
hit another problem. Since posting the first thread, I moved on in the
Cluster from Scratch tutorial and got to the point where I was running
Active/Active.
Here I have a
On 02/01/14 11:56 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.01.2014 07:46, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
While trying to test to answer questions from my previous thread, I
hit another problem. Since posting the first thread, I moved on in the
Cluster from Scratch tutorial and got to the point where I was
On 03/01/14 12:07 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 02/01/14 11:56 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
03.01.2014 07:46, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
While trying to test to answer questions from my previous thread, I
hit another problem. Since posting the first thread, I moved on in the
Cluster from Scratch
18 matches
Mail list logo
