29.01.2014 08:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
Thats a known deficiency in the v1 diff format (and why we need costly
digests to detect ordering changes).
Happily .12 will have a new and improve diff format that will handle this
correctly.
Does your recent cib-performance rewrite address
17.02.2014 04:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 11 Feb 2014, at 2:49 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi,
cannot find anywhere (am I blind?), is it possible to manually inject
'reload' op for a given resource?
Background for this is if some configuration files are edited,
18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida yusk.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I measure the performance of Pacemaker in the following combinations.
Pacemaker-1.1.11.rc1
libqb-0.16.0
corosync-2.3.2
All nodes are KVM virtual machines.
stopped the
On 18 Feb 2014, at 7:25 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
29.01.2014 08:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
Thats a known deficiency in the v1 diff format (and why we need costly
digests to detect ordering changes).
Happily .12 will have a new and improve diff format that will
On 18 Feb 2014, at 7:40 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida yusk.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I measure the performance of Pacemaker in the following combinations.
Pacemaker-1.1.11.rc1
On 18 Feb 2014, at 8:18 pm, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 18 Feb 2014, at 7:40 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida yusk.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I measure the
The 3rd node should (and needs to be) fenced at this point to allow the
cluster to continue.
Is this not happening?
The fencing operation appears to complete successfully, here is the
sequence:
[1] All 3 nodes running properly
[2] On node 3 I run echo c /proc/sysrq-trigger which hangs
Hi, ALL and Andrew!
Today is a good day - I killed a lot, and a lot of shooting at me.
In general - I am happy (almost like an elephant) :)
Except resources on the node are important to me eight processes:
corosync,pacemakerd,cib,stonithd,lrmd,attrd,pengine,crmd.
I killed them with different
Hi, Andrew and Digimer
Thank you for the comment.
I solved with reference to other mailing list about this problem.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880035
It seems that the kernel of my environment was old when said from the
conclusion.
It updated to the newest kernel now.
18.02.2014 14:12, Asgaroth пишет:
The 3rd node should (and needs to be) fenced at this point to allow the
cluster to continue.
Is this not happening?
The fencing operation appears to complete successfully, here is the
sequence:
[1] All 3 nodes running properly
[2] On node 3 I run echo c
Hi, ALL and Andrew!
Today is a good day - I killed a lot, and a lot of shooting at me.
In general - I am happy (almost like an elephant) :)
Except resources on the node are important to me eight processes:
corosync,pacemakerd,cib,stonithd,lrmd,attrd,pengine,crmd.
I killed them with different
- Original Message -
From: Santiago Pérez santiago.pe...@entertainment-solutions.eu
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:50:41 PM
Subject: [Pacemaker] Possible error in RA invocation
Hi everyone,
I am running a two-node cluster which hosts two
- Original Message -
From: Jefferson Carlos Machado lista.li...@results.com.br
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 7:03:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] [Gluster-users] Pacemaker and GlusterFS
Hi Vossel,
I
- Original Message -
From: renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
To: PaceMaker-ML pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 7:06:53 PM
Subject: [Pacemaker] [Problem] Fail-over is delayed.(State transition is not
calculated.)
Hi All,
I confirmed movement at the time
i sometimes have the same situation. sleep ~30 seconds between startup
cman and clvmd helps a lot.
Thanks for the tip, I just tried this (added sleep 30 in the start section of
case statement in cman script, but this did not resolve the issue for me), for
some reason clvmd just refuses to
18.02.2014 19:49, Asgaroth wrote:
i sometimes have the same situation. sleep ~30 seconds between startup
cman and clvmd helps a lot.
Thanks for the tip, I just tried this (added sleep 30 in the start
section of case statement in cman script, but this did not resolve the
issue for me), for
- Original Message -
From: Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:02:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] node1 fencing itself after node2 being fenced
18.02.2014 19:49, Asgaroth wrote:
i sometimes have the same
18.02.2014 23:01, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com To:
pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014
1:02:09 PM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] node1 fencing itself after
node2 being fenced
18.02.2014 19:49,
Just a guess. Do you have startup fencing enabled in dlm-controld (I actually
do not remember if it is applicable to cman's version, but it exists in
dlm-4) or
cman?
If yes, then that may play its evil game, because imho it is not intended to
use with pacemaker which has its own startup
Hi everyone,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:54:29 +0900 (JST)
renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I found your correction.
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/37ff51a0edba208e6240e812936717fffc941a41
Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Wed, 2014/2/12,
Hi David,
Thank you for comments.
You have resource-stickiness=INFINITY, this is what is preventing the
failover from occurring. Set resource-stickiness=1 or 0 and the failover
should occur.
However, the resource moves by a calculation of the next state transition.
By a calculation of
On 19 Feb 2014, at 10:48 am, Kristoffer Grönlund kgronl...@suse.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:54:29 +0900 (JST)
renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I found your correction.
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:57:29 +1100
Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
It appears Yan did this on purpose.
The reason would likely be that this set is for use in a location
constraint (not ordering or colocation). And in particular, it is
creating a fake set for resources using the same
On 18 Feb 2014, at 11:05 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi, ALL and Andrew!
Today is a good day - I killed a lot, and a lot of shooting at me.
In general - I am happy (almost like an elephant) :)
Except resources on the node are important to me eight processes:
On 18 Feb 2014, at 9:29 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi, ALL and Andrew!
Today is a good day - I killed a lot, and a lot of shooting at me.
In general - I am happy (almost like an elephant) :)
Except resources on the node are important to me eight processes:
On 19 Feb 2014, at 7:16 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
18.02.2014 23:01, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com To:
pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014
1:02:09 PM Subject: Re:
On 18 Feb 2014, at 9:12 pm, Asgaroth li...@blueface.com wrote:
The 3rd node should (and needs to be) fenced at this point to allow the
cluster to continue.
Is this not happening?
The fencing operation appears to complete successfully, here is the
sequence:
[1] All 3 nodes running
Hi Andrew,
I'll follow up on the bug.
Thanks!
Hideo Yamauch.
--- On Wed, 2014/2/19, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
I'll follow up on the bug.
On 19 Feb 2014, at 10:55 am, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for comments.
You have
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
So I'm confused as to what the problem is.
What are you expecting crm_mon to show?
I wish it is displayed as follows.
* Node srv01:
+ default_ping_set : 0 : Connectivity is lost
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Wed,
On 19 Feb 2014, at 4:00 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
19.02.2014, 06:48, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 18 Feb 2014, at 11:05 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi, ALL and Andrew!
Today is a good day - I killed a lot, and a lot of shooting at me.
In
19.02.2014, 09:08, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 19 Feb 2014, at 4:00 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
19.02.2014, 06:48, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 18 Feb 2014, at 11:05 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi, ALL and Andrew!
Today is a good day
On 19 Feb 2014, at 4:18 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
19.02.2014, 09:08, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 19 Feb 2014, at 4:00 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
19.02.2014, 06:48, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 18 Feb 2014, at 11:05 pm, Andrey
On 19 Feb 2014, at 2:55 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
So I'm confused as to what the problem is.
What are you expecting crm_mon to show?
I wish it is displayed as follows.
* Node srv01:
+ default_ping_set : 0
Hi Andrew,
I wish it is displayed as follows.
* Node srv01:
+ default_ping_set : 0 : Connectivity is
lost
Ah! https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/5d51930
It was displayed definitely.
Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Wed, 2014/2/19,
19.02.2014, 09:49, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 19 Feb 2014, at 4:18 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
19.02.2014, 09:08, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 19 Feb 2014, at 4:00 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
19.02.2014, 06:48, Andrew Beekhof
35 matches
Mail list logo
