*From: *Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
*Sent: * 2014-06-11 02:36:15 EDT
*To: *The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
*Subject: *Re: [Pacemaker] resources not rebalancing
On 11 Jun 2014, at 3:44 pm, Patrick Hemmer pacema...@feystorm.net wrote:
Right. But each
Hi Andrew,
On 02.06.2014 02:57, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
This seems to be some kind of a race condition: I added
sleep 3
to a central point in /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/linbit/drbd.
Define central?
===
$ diff -u drbd.orig
Hi guys,
I am trying to deal somehow with split brain situation in 2 node cluster
using votequorum.
Here is a quorum section in my corosync.conf:
provider: corosync_votequorum
expected_votes: 2
wait_for_all: 1
last_man_standing: 1
auto_tie_breaker: 1
My question is about behavior of the
11.06.2014 16:26, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
Hi guys,
I am trying to deal somehow with split brain situation in 2 node cluster
using votequorum.
Here is a quorum section in my corosync.conf:
provider: corosync_votequorum
expected_votes: 2
Just a side note, not an answer to your
On 10.06.2014 01:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 10 Jun 2014, at 4:07 am, Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr
wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I have an issue with a 2-node Debian Wheezy primary/primary DRBD
Pacemaker/Corosync configuration.
After a 'crm node standby' then a 'crm node
On 10.06.2014 05:28, Digimer wrote:
On 09/06/14 07:44 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 10 Jun 2014, at 4:07 am, Alexis de BRUYN
alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I have an issue with a 2-node Debian Wheezy primary/primary DRBD
Pacemaker/Corosync configuration.
After a
two_node option is my another question. I think it's not for this thread.
last_man_standing: 1
auto_tie_breaker: 1
So, anyway the only node will remain working in split brain (or one node
shout down) situation is that with the lowest id.
And that is like roulette, in case we lose the lowest
On 06/11/14 16:35, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
And that is like roulette, in case we lose the lowest nodeid we lose all.
So I can lose only the node which doesn't have the lowest nodeid?
And it's not useful in 2 node cluster.
Am i correct?
It may be usefull. If you define roles of the
Chrissy? Can you shed some light here?
On 11 Jun 2014, at 11:26 pm, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko
konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I am trying to deal somehow with split brain situation in 2 node cluster
using votequorum.
Here is a quorum section in my corosync.conf:
On 12 Jun 2014, at 12:13 am, Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr
wrote:
On 10.06.2014 01:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 10 Jun 2014, at 4:07 am, Alexis de BRUYN alexis.mailingl...@de-bruyn.fr
wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I have an issue with a 2-node Debian Wheezy primary/primary
On 11 Jun 2014, at 10:59 pm, Patrick Hemmer pacema...@feystorm.net wrote:
From: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
Sent: 2014-06-11 02:36:15 EDT
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] resources not rebalancing
On 11 Jun 2014, at
Referring to the king of drbd...
Lars, question for you inline.
On 11 Jun 2014, at 11:14 pm, Robert Dahlem robert.dah...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 02.06.2014 02:57, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
This seems to be some kind of a race condition: I added
sleep 3
to a central point in
12 matches
Mail list logo
