Re: [Pacemaker] Corosync fails to start when NIC is absent

2015-01-20 Thread Jan Friesse
Kostiantyn, One more thing to clarify. You said rebind can be avoided - what does it mean? By that I mean that as long as you don't shutdown interface everything will work as expected. Interface shutdown is administrator decision, system doesn't do it automagically :) Regards, Honza

Re: [Pacemaker] Corosync fails to start when NIC is absent

2015-01-20 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jan Friesse jfrie...@redhat.com wrote: Kostiantyn, One more thing to clarify. You said rebind can be avoided - what does it mean? By that I mean that as long as you don't shutdown interface everything will work as expected. Interface shutdown is

Re: [Pacemaker] Corosync fails to start when NIC is absent

2015-01-20 Thread Kostiantyn Ponomarenko
Got it. Thank you =) I just thought about possibility of a NIC to burn down. Thank you, Kostya On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Jan Friesse jfrie...@redhat.com wrote: Kostiantyn, One more thing to clarify. You said rebind can be avoided - what does it mean? By that I mean that as long

[Pacemaker] breaking resource dependencies by replacing resource group by co-location constrains

2015-01-20 Thread Sven Moeller
Hi, i have a Cluster running on SLES 11 SP3. A resource group is defined. So every entry in that resource group is a hard dependency for the folliowing resource in that group. If just only one resource fails on both nodes, the resource res_MyApplication won't be started. I want to change that

Re: [Pacemaker] breaking resource dependencies by replacing resource group by co-location constrains

2015-01-20 Thread Andrew Beekhof
group grp_application res_mount-application res_Service-IP res_mount-CIFSshareData res_mount-CIFSshareData2 res_mount-CIFSshareData3 res_MyApplication is just a shortcut for colocation res_Service-IP with res_mount-application colocation res_mount-CIFSshareData with res_Service-IP ... and

Re: [Pacemaker] One more globally-unique clone question

2015-01-20 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 20 Jan 2015, at 4:13 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote: 20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 17 Jan 2015, at 1:25 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote: Hi all, Trying to reproduce problem with early stop of globally-unique clone instances

Re: [Pacemaker] One more globally-unique clone question

2015-01-20 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
21.01.2015 03:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 20 Jan 2015, at 4:13 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote: 20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 17 Jan 2015, at 1:25 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote: Hi all, Trying to reproduce problem with early stop of