Re: [Pacemaker] [crmsh][Question] The order of resources is changed.

Hi, 21.01.2015 12:50, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: Hello, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp writes: Hi All, We confirmed a function of crmsh by the next combination. * corosync-2.3.4 * pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.12 * crmsh-2.1.0 By new crmsh, does options sort-elements no not work? Is there the

[Pacemaker] CentOS 7, VirtualDomain stop problem

Hello I have CentOS 7 Pacemaker 1.1.10-32.el7_0.1 Corosync Cluster Engine, version '2.3.3' libvirtd (libvirt) 1.1.1 with a virtual machine defined Resource: srvdev02 (class=ocf provider=heartbeat type=VirtualDomain) Attributes: hypervisor=qemu:///system config=/home/datos/xmls/srvdev02.xml

[Pacemaker] Master-Slave role stickiness

Hi, I've got a master-slave resource and I'd like to achieve the following behavior with it: * Only ever run (as master or slave) on 2 specific nodes (out of N possible nodes). These nodes are predetermined and are specified at resource creation time. * Prefer one specific node (of the 2

Re: [Pacemaker] [crmsh][Question] The order of resources is changed.

Hi Kristoffer, It is possible that there is a bug in crmsh, I will investigate.   Could you file an issue for this problem at http://github.com/crmsh/crmsh/issues ? This would help me track the problem. Okay! Many Thanks! Hideo Yamauchi. - Original Message - From: Kristoffer

[Pacemaker] Colocation constraint getting removed

Any pointers on this would be helpful. Regards Arjun On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Arjun Pandey apandepub...@gmail.com wrote: I am running a 2 node cluster(active-standby mode) with this config CentOS-6.5 pacemaker 1.1.10-14.el6_5.3 pcs 0.9.90-2.el6.centos.3 - (none) noarch corosync

Re: [Pacemaker] Colocating with unmanaged resource

On 15 Jan 2015, at 12:54 am, Покотиленко Костик cas...@meteor.dp.ua wrote: В Вто, 06/01/2015 в 16:27 +1100, Andrew Beekhof пишет: On 20 Dec 2014, at 6:21 am, Покотиленко Костик cas...@meteor.dp.ua wrote: Here are behaviors of different versions of pacemaker: 1.1.12: - stopping nginx

[Pacemaker] [crmsh][Question] The order of resources is changed.

Hi All, We confirmed a function of crmsh by the next combination.  * corosync-2.3.4  * pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.12  * crmsh-2.1.0 We prepared the following cli file. --- ### Cluster Option ### property no-quorum-policy=ignore \ stonith-enabled=true \

Re: [Pacemaker] [crmsh][Question] The order of resources is changed.

Hello, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp writes: Hi All, We confirmed a function of crmsh by the next combination.  * corosync-2.3.4  * pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.12  * crmsh-2.1.0 By new crmsh, does options sort-elements no not work? Is there the option which does not change order elsewhere?

Re: [Pacemaker] Unique clone instance is stopped too early on move

20.01.2015 02:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 16 Jan 2015, at 3:59 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote: 16.01.2015 07:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 15 Jan 2015, at 3:11 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote: 13.01.2015 11:32, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: On Tue, Jan

[Pacemaker] Two node cluster and no hardware device for stonith.

Hi All, I have a question about stonith In my scenarion , I have to create 2 node cluster, but I don't have any hardware device for stonith. No APC no IPMI ecc, no one of the list returned by pcs stonith list So, there is an option to do something? This is my scenario: - 2 nodes cluster serverHA1