It looks like jiravip1 has failed in a lot of places.
Is this the complete configuration? I would have expected some colocation
constraints from the behaviour.
Also, you understand what symmetric-cluster=false does?
On 13 Feb 2015, at 4:29 am, Krakowitzer, Merritt mkrakowit...@fnb.co.za
- Original Message -
Hi,
Hey Steve, Good to see you around :)
I am working on Containerizing OpenStack in the Kolla project (
http://launchpad.net/kolla ). One of the key things we want to do over the
next few months is add H/A support to our container tech. David Vossel had
On 10 Feb 2015, at 1:45 pm, Serge Dubrouski serge...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Steve,
Are you sure that Pacemaker is the right product for your project? Have you
checked Mesos/Marathon or Kubernates? Those are frameworks being developed
for managing containers.
And in a few years they'll
24.02.2015 01:58, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jan 2015, at 5:08 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
21.01.2015 03:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 20 Jan 2015, at 4:13 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 17 Jan 2015,
On 8 Feb 2015, at 7:09 am, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I am working on Containerizing OpenStack in the Kolla project
(http://launchpad.net/kolla). One of the key things we want to do over the
next few months is add H/A support to our container tech. David Vossel
On 26 Jan 2015, at 10:53 am, Dmitry Koterov dmitry.kote...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I have a 3-node cluster where node1 and node2 are running corosync+pacemaker
and node3 is running corosync only (for quorum). Corosync 2.3.3, pacemaker
1.1.10. Everything worked fine the first couple of
On 22 Jan 2015, at 4:39 pm, Arjun Pandey apandepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Any pointers on this would be helpful.
Constraints don't get removed automatically unless someone asked for a resource
that it references to be deleted.
Other possibilities include, someone asked to delete the constraint
On 27 Jan 2015, at 5:23 pm, Jake Smith jsm...@argotec.com wrote:
Had a failover of my active/passive cluster and now the passive node will not
rejoin the cluster.
2 nodes running Ubuntu 12.04
coro 1.4.2-2, openais 1.1.4-4, pcmk 1.1.6-2ubuntu3
Corosync ring membership is fine on
On 28 Jan 2015, at 9:20 pm, Sergey Arlashin sergeyarl.maill...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
I have a small corosync/pacemaker based cluster which consists of 4 nodes. 2
nodes are in standby mode, another 2 actually handle all the resources.
corosync ver. 1.4.7-1.
pacemaker ver 1.1.11.
On 21 Jan 2015, at 5:08 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
21.01.2015 03:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 20 Jan 2015, at 4:13 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 17 Jan 2015, at 1:25 am, Vladislav Bogdanov
10 matches
Mail list logo
