Re: [Pacemaker] Running pacemaker as non-root user

2015-02-24 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 24 Feb 2015, at 10:36 pm, N, Ravikiran ravikira...@hp.com wrote: Hi all, I was trying to find out whether it is possible to START/STOP pacemaker, and also run PCS commands as non-root user (in my case it is ‘admin’ user). I did add the user(‘admin’) to haclient group, but it is of

[Pacemaker] Running pacemaker as non-root user

2015-02-24 Thread N, Ravikiran
Hi all, I was trying to find out whether it is possible to START/STOP pacemaker, and also run PCS commands as non-root user (in my case it is 'admin' user). I did add the user('admin') to haclient group, but it is of no help. I get the following error on start : [admin@vm4 ~]$ service

Re: [Pacemaker] Running pacemaker as non-root user

2015-02-24 Thread N, Ravikiran
I could resolve this by adding user 'admin' to sudoers list.. I added the user to 'wheel' user. With this I can run all commands with a sude appended.. Thanks for your help.. :) Ravikiran -Original Message- From: N, Ravikiran Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:11 AM To: The

Re: [Pacemaker] 'stop' operation passes outdated set of instance attributes to RA

2015-02-24 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
23.02.2015 21:50, David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - On 14 Feb 2015, at 1:10 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote: Hi, I believe that is a bug that 'stop' operation uses set of instance attributes from the original 'start' op, not what successful 'reload' had.

Re: [Pacemaker] Running pacemaker as non-root user

2015-02-24 Thread N, Ravikiran
Hi Andrew, Yes I tried 'pcs' commands. Even they do not work, they throw the same error. Ravikiran -Original Message- From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 1:31 AM To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Running

Re: [Pacemaker] Suggestions for managing HA of containers from within a Pacemaker container?

2015-02-24 Thread Serge Dubrouski
Pacemaker as a scheduler in Mesos or Kubernates does sound like a very interesting idea. Packaging corosync into super privileged containers still doesn't make too much sense to me. What's the reason in isolating something and then giving it all permissions on a host machine? On Mon, Feb 23, 2015