23.06.2010 13:07, shejimshad M wrote:
While installing pacemaker.rpm then we
encountered an error 1:pacemaker warning: user mockbuild
does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
### [100%]
error:
02.08.2010 04:17, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
...
Problem 3) There is a case to fail in the start of a cib process and the
attrd process.
Jul 30 14:25:46 x3650g attrd: [26258]: ERROR: ais_dispatch: Receiving message
body failed: (2) Library
error: Resource temporarily unavailable
03.08.2010 10:29, Brett Delle Grazie wrote:
...
(c) Try recompiling RHEL 6.x Beta packages - no guarantees here but it
should be possible, maybe.
To use OCFS2, GFS2 or CLVM with corosync one needs support for userspace
cluster stack in DLM, which is missing from EL5 kernel, so this would
not
11.08.2010 22:09, patrick.ouel...@promutuel.ca пишет:
First of all, wow guys great software I love it so far.
Second, I hope im posting this at the right place or i'll get flamed.
I have followed the great document by Andrew Cluster from scratch
but since im using more recent version of
25.08.2010 08:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi all,
pacemaker has
# chkconfig - 90 90
in its MCP initscript.
Shouldn't it be corrected to 90 10?
I thought higher numbers started later and shut down earlier
03.09.2010 19:34, Steven Dake wrote:
Nope, they are in a natural order for both start and stop sequences.
So lower number means 'do start or stop earlier'.
grep '# chkconfig' /etc/init.d/*
Ok, thanks. Changed to 10
Given that corosync default is 20/80, shouldnt mcp be 21/79?
I think
04.09.2010 12:26, Alisson Landim wrote:
Hey, i notice something when i restarted both computers.
The problem of the kernel bug occurs when the second computer loads,
until there the first computer was able to mount using your hint of
/dev/drbd1. The file system was mounted and everything
08.09.2010 05:19, Alisson Landim wrote:
After setting up a 2 node cluster following the cluster from scratch
guide for Fedora 13 i have to say that GFS2 filesystem (active/active)
doesn't work!
If the kernel bug described below is not caused by one the modifications
i HAD to do following
08.09.2010 09:25, Alisson Landim wrote:
I am updating this post with an info.
After stopping the WebFS resource i could create the GFS2 filesystem on
the second node so the only difference now from the Cluster from scratch
guide is the:
1 - Changed /dev/drbd/by-res/wwwdata to /dev/drbd1 on
13.09.2010 16:21, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
[...]
Could you paste output from drbd-overview? drbd device should be in
Primary state on node where you issue mount.
And...
Did you start corosync or openais? Later
Hi Andrew, hi all,
Upgraded to todays tip and see bunch of assertion messages in logs
(together with some segfaults from pengine).
Here is what I see:
Sep 13 16:53:43 s01-1 pengine: [4120]: ERROR: crm_abort: xpath_search:
Triggered assert at xml.c:2599 : xml_top != NULL
Sep 13 16:56:14 s01-1
Hi Andrew, hi all.
I decided to return to this issue again because of issues with
libvirt/KVM virtual domains controlled by pacemaker.
libvirt package on Fedora 13 has two init scripts: libvirtd and
libvirt-guests.
They have following chkconfig values:
libvirtd: 97 03
libvirt-guests: 98 02
22.09.2010 11:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi Andrew, hi all.
I decided to return to this issue again because of issues with
libvirt/KVM virtual domains controlled by pacemaker.
libvirt package on Fedora 13 has
Hi!
This patch breaks rpm build and seems to be unneeded (at least on F13)
Italian docs are generated without it.
http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/diff/ac25a4ecdbcb/doc/Clusters_from_Scratch/publican.cfg.in
Symptoms:
$ make Clusters_from_Scratch.txt
Building Clusters_from_Scratch
rm -rf
Hi all,
just wondering, is there a way to make resource depend on (be colocated
with) either of two other resources?
Use case is iSCSI initiator connection to iSCSI target with two portals.
Idea is to have f.e. device manager multipath resource depend on both
iSCSI connection resources, but in a
05.10.2010 12:12, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
Hi all,
just wondering, is there a way to make resource depend on (be colocated
with) either of two other resources?
Not yet. Its something we want to support
11.10.2010 09:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
strictly speaking you don't.
but at least on fedora, the policy is that $x-libs always requires $x
so just building against heartbeat-libs means that yum will suck in
the main heartbeat package :-(
And this seem to be a bit incorrect statement btw:
12.10.2010 07:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
11.10.2010 09:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
strictly speaking you don't.
but at least on fedora, the policy is that $x-libs always requires $x
so just building against
19.10.2010 02:18, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
Hi,
What is the crm shell command to move drbd master to a different node?
I didn't find it too.
The only way to move ms resource I found is to move some other ordinary
resource which is collocated with that ms (drbd) resource.
But it remains unclear,
28.10.2010 03:36, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
...
Short version: How do I configure multiple independent two-node clusters
where the nodes are all on the same subnet? Only the two nodes that form
the cluster should see that cluster's resources and not any other.
Is this possible? Where
04.11.2010 13:36, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
...
why do you want that?
Customer request. Definitely NOT my idea.
something like this could be useful
location master-location ms-drbd_02 rule $id=master-rule
$role=Master -1000: #uname eq node-02
-1000 is too weak
s/-1000/-inf/
this will
05.11.2010 19:39, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
...
As Yuusuke IIDA pointed out this is a new and expected behavior of crm_mon.
To be honest I don't excited about it, since -A flag fills screen with
master-drbd scores and not just pingd.
watch crm_mon -1A|grep -E \^(\* Node|\+ ping)\ ?
Hi Andrew,
It was a big surprise for me to see all pacemaker-specific bits removed
from dlm and gfs2 in cluster-3.1.0, so there is currently no way to use
pacemaker on f13 with dlm/gfs2/clvm but without cman.
So, would you please bring some light on details of integration with cman?
Especially
23.12.2010 14:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
It was a big surprise for me to see all pacemaker-specific bits removed
from dlm and gfs2 in cluster-3.1.0, so there is currently no way to use
pacemaker
23.12.2010 14:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
Otherwise I probably need to
configure huge timeouts for operations and then cluster becomes not
smart. Under 'specific resources' I mean LVM VGs and LVs together with
gfs2 filesystems. I currently have problems with fence domain stability
18.01.2011 14:45, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Jan 17, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Back again to setup an active/passive cluster for Xen with live migration
but so far, no go. Xen DomU is shutdown and restarted when I move the
Xen resource.
I'm using Debian Squeeze,
Hi all,
It looks like configuration lines are pushed to running CIB line-by-line
during 'crm configure load update', rather then edit-all/commit.
I just observed this while pushing dozen of new primitives together with
colocation/order constraints - primitives tried to start (and failed) on
a
Unless clustered LVM locking is enabled and working:
# sed -ri 's/^([ \t]+locking_type).*/locking_type = 3/'
/etc/lvm/lvm.conf
# sed -ri 's/^([ \t]+fallback_to_local_locking).*/
fallback_to_local_locking = 1/' /etc/lvm/lvm.conf
# vgchange -cy VG_NAME
# service clvmd start
# vgs|grep
18.01.2011 15:41, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
...
I have tried it myself, but concluded it's impossible to do it reliably
with the current code.
For the live migration to work you have to remove any colocation
constraints (group included) with the Xen resource.
drbd code includes a helper
18.01.2011 16:00, Vladislav Bogdanov пишет:
18.01.2011 15:41, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
...
I have tried it myself, but concluded it's impossible to do it reliably
with the current code.
For the live migration to work you have to remove any colocation
constraints (group included
18.01.2011 18:22, Dejan Muhamedagic пишет:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:35:15PM +0200, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi all,
It looks like configuration lines are pushed to running CIB line-by-line
during 'crm configure load update', rather then edit-all/commit.
I just observed this while
18.01.2011 19:41, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
[...]
No, it shouldn't be so, but I'm not sure. The earlier commit
procedure has been quite complex (unnecessarily), and it's still
sometimes in use in pacemaker 1.0.x. Is that the version you're
running?
No, 1.1.4.
Updating to latest tip right
08.02.2011 17:13, Testuser SST wrote:
Hi,
I´m implementing a two node webserver on CentOS 5 with
heartbeat/pacemaker and DRBD. The first new installed node works
fine, but when the second node becomes active, there seems to be a
problem with the apache starting up. Is there a way to get
Hi,
21.02.2011 22:29, Florian Haas wrote:
On 02/21/2011 08:00 PM, Frederik Schüler wrote:
Hello *,
as the various ocf:*:ping[d] incarnations don't meet my specific needs,
May I ask why and how?
I was thinking about writing something similar. I need this in a quite
complex networking setup,
.
#
# Copyright (c) 2011 Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
# Partially based on 'ping' RA by Andrew Beekhof
#
# OCF instance parameters:
#OCF_RESKEY_name: name of attribute to set in CIB
#OCF_RESKEY_iface: space separated list of network interfaces to monitor
#OCF_RESKEY_bridge_ports
Hi again,
attached is a bit more polished revision.
Best,
Vladislav
22.02.2011 15:01, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Dejan,
22.02.2011 13:02, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
Where can you get STP stuff from? How to interpret it? And then
Please look at attached RA.
I decided that today
22.02.2011 15:01, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Dejan,
22.02.2011 13:02, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
Where can you get STP stuff from? How to interpret it? And then
Please look at attached RA.
I decided that today is a good time to finally brace myself to find 5
hours to write
of network interface and records it
as a value in CIB
# based on summ of speeds of its active underlying interfaces.
#
# Copyright (c) 2011 Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
# Partially based on 'ping' RA by Andrew Beekhof
#
# OCF instance parameters:
#OCF_RESKEY_name: name
25.02.2011 00:08, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
I wonder if that would be possible to make Pacemaker to move virtual
IP from one interface to another (not from one node to another) using
an RA like this one.
I just use STP-enabled bridge for this purpose. All ports except one are
blocked by STP until
25.02.2011 00:08, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
I wonder if that would be possible to make Pacemaker to move virtual
IP from one interface to another (not from one node to another) using
an RA like this one.
I just use STP-enabled bridge for this purpose. All ports except one are
blocked by STP
08.03.2011 12:25, rakesh k wrote:
Larry Brigman larry.brigman@... writes:
Hi Larry
Thanks for you suggestion the when i tried to install
e2fsprogs-libs-1.39-23.el5_5.1 rpm file it says it is uptodate and again i
tried
to install cluster glue using make command . which thrown me the
09.03.2011 07:35, rakesh k wrote:
When i listed down all the packages in CentOS i found this package is already
isntalled
i used rpm-qa for listing down the packages
Ahm, el5/centos5 have it in e2fsprogs-devel.
Install that package and this should help.
And there is no
09.03.2011 11:08, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:14:47AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to setup a redundant storage system using centos5, pacemaker,
corosync, drbd, nfs and
:53, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Lars,
thank you for your time and for so detailed review.
Just to dot half of i's (where it is about coding style):
1. I strongly prefer to cleanly separate data access from main logic by API.
2. I prefer to have non-void functions to return result
Oops, this is actually a bug in fence_ipmilan which reports all params
as unique.
26.03.2011 08:28, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi,
it seems like it was commit d0472a26eda1 which now causes following:
WARNING: Resources
stonith-v02-a,stonith-v02-b,stonith-v02-c,stonith-v02-d violate
01.04.2011 11:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
01.04.2011 10:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
The clone instance numbers for anonymous clones are an implementation
detail and nothing should be inferred from them.
Did anything
Hi,
You need some tuning from both sides.
First, (at least some versions of) ietd needs to be blocked (-j DROP)
with iptables on restarts. That means, you should block all incoming and
outgoing packets (later is more important) before ietd stop and unblock
all after it starts. I use home-brew
.
* http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2574
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Fri, 2011/4/1, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
01.04.2011 11:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote
Hi Yan,
27.04.2011 07:32, Yan Gao wrote:
Hi Yuusuke,
On 04/19/11 19:55, Yan Gao wrote:
Actually I've been optimizing the placement-strategy lately. It will
sort the resource processing order according to the priorities and
scores of resources. That should result in ideal placement. Stay
Hi,
24.05.2011 11:54, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 03:31:01PM +0800, jiaju liu wrote:
HI all I use ipmi as stonith resource. the interface I use lanplus first,
however, it doesn't work. I check log,it shows nodea external/ipmi[3433]:
ERROR: error executing
Hi,
25.05.2011 03:49, jiaju liu wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 03:31:01PM +0800, jiaju liu wrote:
HI all I use ipmi as stonith resource. the interface I use
lanplus first, however, it doesn't work. I check log,it shows nodea
external/ipmi[3433]:
Hi,
29.05.2011 22:38, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to adapt my Node Assassin[1] device to support Pacemaker.
Currently it supports RHCS and the agent is built to the
FenceAgentAPI[2]. I'm hoping it can be fairly easily adapted to
Pacemaker's specs.
Pacemaker has native support for
Hi all.
I've got a task to remove some nodes from cluster to save some power and
found that it is not sufficient to follow
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/s-node-delete.html#s-del-ais
After pacemaker is then restarted on any another remaining node,
Hi,
30.05.2011 17:12, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:58:17PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi all.
I've got a task to remove some nodes from cluster to save some power and
found that it is not sufficient to follow
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker
31.05.2011 12:32, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:27:41PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi,
30.05.2011 17:12, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:58:17PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi all.
I've got a task to remove some nodes from cluster
Hi all,
silly question:
does anybody have working configuration with two stonith paths to
cluster node?
Background is:
I have two stonith resources configured for each node in two-node cluster:
primitive stonith-s01-0 stonith:external/ipmi \
params hostname=s01-0 ipaddr=10.5.4.250
with?
And, is design of stonith subsystem documented somewhere? Can you
shortly describe it if it is not?
Best,
Vladislav
04.06.2011 12:08, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi all,
silly question:
does anybody have working configuration with two stonith paths to
cluster node?
Background is:
I have two
11.06.2011 19:01, Alfredo Parisi wrote:
Hi and thanks for the reply.
I've found the problem, pacemaker haven't the privileges for create the
file mysqld.sock, infact if I stop one server and create mysqld.sock
with 777 and own mysql:mysql, after restart corosync, it works...
but this is only
21.06.2011 17:23, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 06:10:16PM +0400, Aleksander Malaev wrote:
How can I check this?
If I don't add this exportfs resource then cluster is become the fully
operational - all mounts are accesible and fail-over between nodes is
working as it
of fail.
That should not be a problem. portmap (rpcbind) is required for nfs to
operate, but not vice-verse.
Best,
Vladislav.
2011/6/21 Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
mailto:deja...@fastmail.fm
Hi Vladislav,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:38:21PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote
Hi Dejan,
21.06.2011 17:46, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Vladislav,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:38:21PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
21.06.2011 17:23, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 06:10:16PM +0400, Aleksander Malaev wrote:
How can I check this?
If I don't add
Hi!
22.06.2011 14:44, Florian Haas wrote:
...
This is something that has been discussed here previously. A resource
agent could report to Pacemaker during monitor (via an exit code named,
say, OCF_ERR_DEGRADED) that a resource, or a resource instance in the
case of a clone or master/slave
Hi all,
I'm pretty sure I bisected commit which breaks restart of (node local)
resources after definition change.
Nodes which has f59d7460bdde applied (v03-a and v03-b in my case) do not
restart such resources, while node without this commit (mgmt01) does.
Here is snippet from DC (grrr,
Hi all,
There is feeling that race condition is possible during live migration
of resources.
I put one node to standby mode, that made all resources migrate to
another one.
Virtual machines were successfully live-migrated, but then marked as
FAILED almost immediately.
Logs show some interesting
05.07.2011 10:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
05.07.2011 04:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Looks like the VirtualDomain RA isn't correctly implementing stop.
Stop of an undefined domain shouldn't produce an error.
Nope
Hi all,
Would somebody (Andrew?) please bring some light on how exactly
redefinition of resource is supposed to be handled?
Below is my (rather perfectionistic) vision on this, please correct me
if/where I'm wrong:
* If RA supports 'reload' action then it is called on resource
definition change
01.08.2011 02:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Hmm. Interesting. I will investigate.
This is an unfortunate side-effect of my history compression
27.07.2011 05:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
* Dependent resources should not be stopped/started for 'reload' action.
Of course they are restarted if reload fails and stop/start is executed
then. (I see that they are restarted now for reload of a resource they
depend on, is it a bug?)
More
04.08.2011 06:08, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
01.08.2011 02:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Beekhof
Hi Andrew, all,
Just found little bit strange crmd behaviour - DC timed out stop
operation (which lead to node fencing) by itself, without even waiting
for lrmd (on another node) to finish that operation.
Here is what it did:
===
Aug 9 07:30:07 mgmt01 crmd: [15781]: WARN:
run.
At the same time (18:17:22) pacemaker began to stop all other logical
volumes resources (except config-templates-lv) and had success.
09.08.2011 11:40, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Andrew, all,
Just found little bit strange crmd behaviour - DC timed out stop
operation (which lead
...
I would really like someone that has these process pause problems to
test a patch I have posted to see if it rectifies the situation. Our
significant QE team at Red Hat doesn't see these problems and I can't
generate them in engineering. It is possible your device drivers are
taking
Hi,
I recently discovered that when I stop pacemaker on DC node (for
upgrade), that node is shortly fenced by a new DC.
Fencing is caused by not-stopped (from the PoV of new DC) clone instance
(dlm in my case) which was actually stopped:
Aug 16 08:56:29 v03-a pengine: [2083]: WARN:
17.08.2011 07:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently discovered that when I stop pacemaker on DC node (for
upgrade), that node is shortly fenced by a new DC.
Fencing is caused by not-stopped (from the PoV
Hi Yan,
27.04.2011 08:14, Yan Gao wrote:
[snip]
Do priorities work for utilization strategy?
Yes, the improvement works for utilization, minimal and balanced
strategy:
- The nodes that are more healthy and have more capacities get consumed
first (globally preferred nodes).
Does this still
23.08.2011 12:19, Gao,Yan wrote:
[snip]
When allocating every resource, we compare the capacity of the nodes.
The node has more remaining capacity is preferred. This would be quite
clear if we only define one kind of capacity. While if we define
multiple kinds of capacity, for example:
If
Hi Andrew, hi all,
I'm further investigating dlm lockspace hangs I described in
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2011-August/msg00133.html
and in the thread starting from
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/openais/2011-September/016701.html
.
What I described there is
Hi Andrew,
26.09.2011 10:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
Hi Andrew, hi all,
I'm further investigating dlm lockspace hangs I described in
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2011-August/msg00133.html
26.09.2011 11:16, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[snip]
Regardless, for 1.1.6 the dlm would be better off making a call like:
rc = st-cmds-fence(st, st_opts, target, reboot, 120);
from fencing/admin.c
That would talk directly to the fencing daemon, bypassing attrd, crnd
and PE - and
27.09.2011 08:59, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[snip]
I agree with Jiaju
(https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/openais/2011-September/016713.html),
that could be solely pacemaker problem, because it probably should
originate fencing itself is such situation I think.
So, using pacemaker/dlm
27.09.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
27.09.2011 08:59, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[snip]
I agree with Jiaju
(https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/openais/2011-September/016713.html),
that could be solely
Hi,
27.09.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[snip]
All the more reason to start using the stonith api directly.
I was playing around list night with the dlm_controld.pcmk code:
https://github.com/beekhof/dlm/commit/9f890a36f6844c2a0567aea0a0e29cc47b01b787
Doesn't seem to apply to 3.0.17,
Hi Andrew,
All the more reason to start using the stonith api directly.
I was playing around list night with the dlm_controld.pcmk code:
https://github.com/beekhof/dlm/commit/9f890a36f6844c2a0567aea0a0e29cc47b01b787
Doesn't seem to apply to 3.0.17, so I rebased that commit against it
03.10.2011 04:41, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[...]
If pacemaker fully finish processing of one membership change - elect
new DC on a quorate partition, and do not try to take over dc role (or
release it) on a non-quorate partition if quorate one exists, that
problem could be gone.
Non quorate
03.10.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanovbub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
03.10.2011 04:41, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[...]
If pacemaker fully finish processing of one membership change - elect
new DC on a quorate partition, and do not try to take over
Hi,
29.09.2011 17:47, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Dejan,
Sorry to hijack, I am also working on the same type of setup as a prototype.
What is the best way to get stonith included for VM setups? Maybe an
SSH stonith?
Again, this is just for the prototype.
You may look at fence-virt.
I use
hosts will list that vm's in qpid, and fence_virt is
not smart enough to deal with that.
Vladislav
Nick.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
Hi,
29.09.2011 17:47, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Dejan,
Sorry to hijack, I am also working on the same
28.10.2011 04:04, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I just want to make sure this is still the case before I go through
with it. I am trying to setup an
active/active using:
Corosync 1.4.2
Pacemaker 1.1.6
Cluster3
DRBD 8.3.7
OCFS2
The only reason I installed Cluster3 was for dlm
02.11.2011 16:36, Nick Khamis wrote:
Vladislav,
Thank you so much for your response. Just to make sure, all I need is to:
* Apply the three patches to cman. Found here
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/75164?do=post_view_threaded;.
* Recompile CMAN
* Do I have to
03.11.2011 15:37, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Vlad,
Thank you so much for your response. I am experiencing the same hang
as well. Did you
have better luck with GFS2, or any other network file system?
If you see almost simultaneous kernel panic on all cluster nodes, then
you probably hit the
be you
remember?
Best,
Vladislav
28.09.2011 17:41, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
All the more reason to start using the stonith api directly.
I was playing around list night with the dlm_controld.pcmk code:
https://github.com/beekhof/dlm/commit
to zero if node have been seen after if was fenced and then appeared again?
14.11.2011 23:36, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I just found another problem with dlm_controld.pcmk (with your latest
patch from github applied and also my fixes to actually build it - they
are included
Hi Andrew, all
Just noticed that reload action does not happen when resource definition
change:
Nov 23 08:16:08 v03-a pengine: [2091]: CRIT: check_action_definition:
Parameters to c5-x64-devel.vds-ok.com-vm_monitor_1 on v03-b changed:
recorded 94f8fd587de8d9dd8454443
cbde11b4e vs.
Hi Andreas,
23.11.2011 13:13, Andreas Kurz wrote:
On 11/23/2011 09:30 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi Andrew, all
Just noticed that reload action does not happen when resource definition
change:
Nov 23 08:16:08 v03-a pengine: [2091]: CRIT: check_action_definition:
Parameters to c5-x64
24.11.2011 07:37, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi Andrew, all
Just noticed that reload action does not happen when resource definition
change:
Nov 23 08:16:08 v03-a pengine: [2091]: CRIT: check_action_definition
24.11.2011 08:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
24.11.2011 07:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I just found another problem
28.11.2011 22:55, Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
Hi,
Scenario: two physical virtualisation hosts run various KVM-based
virtual machines, managed by Libvirt. Two VMs, one on each host, form a
Pacemaker cluster, say for a simple database server, using DRBD and a
virtual/cluster IP address. Using
30.11.2011 14:08, Vadim Bulst wrote:
Hello,
first of all I'd like to ask you a general question:
Does somebody successfully set up a clvm cluster with pacemaker and run
it in productive mode?
I will say yes after I finally resolve remaining dlmfencing issues.
Now back to the concrete
over accidentally
found one, but it does its function for me.
Set 'avoid_lck' to 1.
Best,
Vladislav
Am 30.11.2011 13:10, schrieb Vadim Bulst:
Am 30.11.2011 12:22, schrieb Vladislav Bogdanov:
30.11.2011 14:08, Vadim Bulst wrote:
Hello,
first of all I'd like to ask you a general question
Hi Andrew, all,
I found that pacemaker runs migrate_from on a migration destination node
even if preceding migrate_to command failed (github master).
Is it intentional?
hb_report?
Best,
Vladislav
___
Pacemaker mailing list:
1 - 100 of 387 matches
Mail list logo
