Hi there,
I'm working on stonith on my test cluster. It has, to me, a strange
behaviour: when the condition to fence the other node happens, is it
normal that both primary/secondary node fences the other one? I thought
that the primary should fence the secondary, as it is the master at drbd
Hi,
27.09.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[snip]
All the more reason to start using the stonith api directly.
I was playing around list night with the dlm_controld.pcmk code:
https://github.com/beekhof/dlm/commit/9f890a36f6844c2a0567aea0a0e29cc47b01b787
Doesn't seem to apply to 3.0.17,
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 09:12:57AM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On 11-09-16 11:14 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:41:42PM +0100, John Spray wrote:
* Is there another way of adding resources which would be safe when
run concurrently?
cibadmin.
But
Hi Andrew,
All the more reason to start using the stonith api directly.
I was playing around list night with the dlm_controld.pcmk code:
https://github.com/beekhof/dlm/commit/9f890a36f6844c2a0567aea0a0e29cc47b01b787
Doesn't seem to apply to 3.0.17, so I rebased that commit against it
On 11-09-28 10:20 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I'm really not sure. Need to investigate this area more.
Well, I am experimenting with cibadmin. It's certainly not as nice and
shiny as crm shell though. :-)
cibadmin talks to the cib (the process) and cib should allow
only one
Max Williams wrote:
Hi,
I have a pair of clustered DNS servers with a virtual IP (VIP) configured. The
problem is that when the VIP fails over, named on the new host of the VIP will
not listen on port 53/UDP of the VIP until it is reloaded (I think this is
because this daemon uses UDP, not
Max Williams max.willi...@betfair.com writes:
I have a pair of clustered DNS servers with a virtual IP (VIP)
configured. The problem is that when the VIP fails over, named on
the new host of the VIP will not listen on port 53/UDP of the VIP
until it is reloaded (I think this is because this
Put bind itself under pacemaker control. You can use LSB RA or OCF RA that I
recently created.
On Sep 28, 2011 10:46 AM, Max Williams max.willi...@betfair.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a pair of clustered DNS servers with a virtual IP (VIP) configured.
The problem is that when the VIP fails over, named
I'm trying to configure Pacemaker to manage a drbd resource on a two-node RHEL
6 cluster by the following guide: http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/DRBD_HowTo_1.0
drbd is 8.04 and works outside of Pacemaker.
My configuration is very simple:
primitive convirt_drbd ocf:linbit:drbd \
Hi, Andrew
Thank you for a reply.
I understood that it was not a problem of pacemaker.
I spend it for the capacity of the disk carefully.
Thanks,
Yuusuke
(2011/09/26 16:20), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
This looks like a libbz2 bug to me.
We're cleaning up the string we're writing out and calling
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Junko IKEDA tsukishima...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Which version did you check?
Pacemaker 1.0.11.
I meant of 1.1 since you said:
Pacemaker 1.1 shows the same behavior.
The latest from git seems to work fine:
Current cluster status:
Online: [ bl460g1n13
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Brad Johnson bjohn...@ecessa.com wrote:
The patch alone does not give an advantage to the active node. But remember
I said we are using an fping resource agent we wrote that varies the
dampening based on which node it is running on and whether the score is
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Brian J. Murrell
br...@interlinx.bc.ca wrote:
On 11-09-16 11:14 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:41:42PM +0100, John Spray wrote:
* Is there another way of adding resources which would be safe when
run concurrently?
cibadmin.
But
13 matches
Mail list logo
