Re: [packman] PMBS - quo vadis?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 11:49 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > 2017-02-24 10:29 GMT+01:00 Stefan Botter : > > > Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > >  I completely agree that the conflicts should be discussed here. >

Re: [packman] PMBS - quo vadis?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 11:09 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote: > Indeed! Another example why the current approach to rely on some > packages being provided by Factory first is kodi-17. It got build by > some fellow packager here in PMBS with an libcec

Re: [packman] Kodi 16 but addons in 17

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 14:49 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote: > thanks for you explanation! I just added a comment to tbe OBS request > asking when we can expect the request to be accepted. I'd urge > everybody > interested in kodi-17 here to add a

[packman] Please activate my PMBS account (pluskalm)

Hello, I have a PMBS account with the username pluskaml, I would like to ask for its activation Thanks Martin Pluskal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de

[packman] Please activate my PMBS account (pluskalm)

Hello, I have created a PMBS account with the username pluskalm, I would like to ask for its activation Thanks a lot Martin Pluskal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http

Re: [packman] Why isn't mediainfo in openSUSE

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 10:25 +0200, Dave Plater wrote: > Hi, does anybody know of a valid legal reason why mediainfo can't be > in openSUSE distribution? > Thanks > Dave Plater Not sure about reasons why it was not, but its being submitted now:

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey)

On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 10:25 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 at 10:08 AM > From: mar...@pluskal.org > > > > On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 21:41 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > > > No. I was talking about the copyring attribution for the spec > > > file > > > itself, with which

Re: [packman] New packages for packman (Walter Fey) (Walter Fey)

On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 09:47 +0200, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 at 12:23 AM > From: "Walter Fey" > > > > I agreed to this and informed him, that due to serious legal > > concerns, > > I cannot publish the copyright remark that is pointing to SUSE > >