2012/2/26 solsTiCe d'Hiver solstice.dhi...@gmail.com:
hi. I have sent a message about that to shining on transifex, but it
seems to go unnoticed so I am reposting it here
Sorry, I did not realize it was a private message.
The advantage of transifex is that everyone can contribute directly to
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org wrote:
This addresses FS#25141. We shouldn't remove every empty directory we
come across during the removal process unless it is truly not known to
any other package. This will prevent removal of essential directories
such as
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
We can readily detect the first node in a list by checking if
node-prev-next is NULL. So there is no need to pass the head
of the list to this function and its prototype now looks like
all the other item accessors.
This
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I still wonder if --skippgpcheck is too long, but I can not think of a
better name. Suggestions from anyone?
--skipinteg / --skipsig or --skippgp ?
+*\--skippgpcheck*::
+ Verify PGP signatures of the source
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
These had not been touched since 2007 and had lost most of their
relevance. The bug tracker is a better place for the filing of
ideas.
Agreed, but if some items are not completely obsolete and don't appear
anywhere in
Allan McRae wrote:
diff --git a/lib/libalpm/deps.c b/lib/libalpm/deps.c
index c5fb92e..b03cd48 100644
--- a/lib/libalpm/deps.c
+++ b/lib/libalpm/deps.c
@@ -570,8 +570,12 @@ static pmpkg_t *resolvedep(pmdepend_t *dep, alpm_list_t
*dbs,
if(_alpm_pkg_should_ignore(pkg))
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
We are looking at a broader problem: it is actually impossible to do any
sane return value checking for all functions returning an alpm_list_t*
since NULL is used both as the error value and as the empty list.
Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
Hello,
While doing experiments, I discovered that alpm_add_pkg() seemingly
stole the ownership of a pmpkg_t previously allocated by
alpm_pkg_load(). I am a bit confused here. I think the documentation
can definitely be improved here: can someone confirm the following
Allan McRae wrote:
Please send patches to the list so that we can complain about issues like:
aba191d5 (Xavier Chantry2011-04-03 10:28:09 +0200 276)
printf(%lc, *p);
util.c: In function ‘indentprint’:
util.c:276:3: error: format ‘%lc’ expects argument of type ‘wint_t
Allan McRae wrote:
But do we really want to add all these warnings in there? I use
all of these:
-Wclobbered -Wempty-body -Wfloat-equal -Wignored-qualifiers
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-parameter-type -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wold-style-declaration -Woverride-init -Wsign-compare
as they looked trivial enough,
but maybe I should have.
http://code.toofishes.net/cgit/xavier/pacman.git/log/?h=working
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Sebastian Nowicki seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like there are more warnings when using gnu89:
$ make 21 | grep 'warning:' | cut -d' ' -f3- | sort | uniq -c
74 comma at end of enumerator list
1 initializer element is not computable at load time
7
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Sebastian Nowicki seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like there are more warnings when using gnu89:
$ make 21 | grep 'warning:' | cut -d' ' -f3- | sort | uniq -c
74 comma at end
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
configure.ac |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 3299302..9fb9cb0 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ AC_PATH_PROGS([BASH_SHELL], [bash
mode.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
lib/libalpm/dload.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libalpm/dload.c b/lib/libalpm/dload.c
index d9e9488..4ebc868 100644
--- a/lib/libalpm/dload.c
+++ b/lib/libalpm/dload.c
@@ -159,7 +159,8
I am just curious, what do we need this flag for ?
I only found this :
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html
GCC implements three different semantics of declaring a function
inline. One is available with -std=gnu89 or -fgnu89-inline or when
gnu_inline attribute is present on all inline
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
I am just curious, what do we need this flag for ?
Searching commits, it wasn't too hard to find this, although I don't
know the full context
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
lib/libalpm/alpm.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libalpm/alpm.h b/lib/libalpm/alpm.h
index b08191d..81877cc 100644
--- a/lib/libalpm/alpm.h
+++ b/lib/libalpm/alpm.h
@@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ int
spotted by clang-analyzer (strcmp with NULL rpath is bad)
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
src/pacman/query.c | 50 +-
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pacman/query.c b/src/pacman
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Yes, this definitely is a libtool issue. It just seems to link all
indirect library dependencies. We can circumvent this by linking with
-Wl,--as-needed but I'm not sure whether this is a valid workaround
-by: Pang Yan Han pangyan...@gmail.com
---
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Well, it actually is a bit more than just a wrong dependency. ioni and
me figured that libalpm 6.0.0 is linked against all libfetch and
libarchive dependencies as well whereas 5.0.3 isn't, so there must have
been
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Well, it actually is a bit more than just a wrong dependency. ioni and
me figured that libalpm 6.0.0 is linked against all libfetch
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm not really sure if this actually is a bug or intended behaviour but
upgrading pacman man my freshly installed system with [testing] enabled
just broke pacman:
$ pacman
pacman: error while loading
---
lib/libalpm/diskspace.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libalpm/diskspace.c b/lib/libalpm/diskspace.c
index 253e118..bfc63e7 100644
--- a/lib/libalpm/diskspace.c
+++ b/lib/libalpm/diskspace.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ int _alpm_check_diskspace(pmtrans_t
(which reused the original file descriptor) was closed instead.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Conder jonno.con...@gmail.com
---
So no one ever spotted this because logs are only made during a transaction ?
Anyway nice finding :)
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I just noticed this:
pacman -Qk | grep ^warning
warning: filesystem: /opt/ (No such file or directory)
warning: hal: /usr/share/hal/fdi/information/20thirdparty/ (No such file or
directory)
warning: hal-info:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I had a fair suspicion this had been discussed before... I just did a
wtf? when I saw /opt had disappeared.
I'm going to create a pactest for this.
If we believe the performance hit to fix this problem is not worth
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
How much of a performance hit would there really be? If I have this right
in my head (big assumption), the file-lists for all packages are read in in
one go. So all that we would have to do is loop over them checking
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed these things a lot in recent patches, so let the
discussion commence.
1) typedef-ed structs. This is just a copy the rest of them habit,
but I really feel we should stop doing this, only typedef-ing when we
are
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jakob Gruber jakob.gru...@gmail.com wrote:
If enabled, displays package lists for upgrade, sync and remove
operations formatted as a table. Falls back to default list display if
insufficient terminal columns are available.
Example output (-Su):
Targets (25):
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:42 PM, edmeiste...@hushmail.com wrote:
Hello pacman team!
I've been following development for quite some time, and would like
to submit my package signing patches for review.
Out of curiosity, what do these patches accomplish exactly ?
However, since some of the
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
This is a draft for the README file update for pacman-3.5.
I have flagged two areas that I am not particularly clear at what happened.
I would be great if the people involved in those changes could make the
appropriate
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:06 PM, IgnorantGuru
jgj7.pacman...@mailnull.com wrote:
Interesting that you think so, because patches are the way to make non-secure
junk. The way to make things work is for the person most familiar with the
code and protocols to make those changes rather than him
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, February 17, 2011, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 06:00, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 17/02/11 10:42, Dan McGee wrote:
So the first command makes sense, and at
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
* Allan's pkghash branch and work. This should be good to go, we were
just sorting out a few lingering issues.
Does that include the move to parsing sync database archives without
extraction?
No. This was a
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the feeling this has been hashed/rehashed/blended before, but
why aren't we just doing something like:
provides=('myenv')
libprovides=('libx.so' 'liby.so')
To me, this seems a lot clearer and alleviates the
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Even if it is negligible, it's munging separate logic together. Given that the
purpose is presumably to save coders a few lines of code, I still think it
would make more sense to use a wrapper function to do that when getting the
Sergej Pupykin wrote:
Hi,
Why pacman think that file is corrupted when I do -Syu and does not
think so when I do -U ... ?
because the checksum is stored in the Sync database, which -U has no knowledge
of. -U only knows the package file you give it.
$ pacman -Syu
.
:: File
dirty indicates if the repo has uncommited changes or not when building,
so dont hardcode this info.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
doc/Makefile.am|2 +-
scripts/Makefile.am|2 +-
src/pacman/Makefile.am |2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I think that if we are providing a selection dialog for provides then it
should present packages from all repos to choose from. Otherwise it seems a
half feature to me.
So my working branch provides a full feature now !
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Awesome! Incredibly minor and pedantic points... The blank line between
the final line of providers and Which one do you want to install? is not
there when selecting members of a group:
e.g.
53) udev 54) usbutils
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Divan Santana di...@s-tainment.co.za wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011 19:39:18 Dan McGee wrote:
You mean like this? https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15772
Darn it...
I should have seen that! I obviously didn't search thorough enough.
I have always wanted
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Florian Pritz bluew...@xssn.at wrote:
From: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
This flag allows to disable version checking in dependency resolving
code.
depcmp_tolerant respects
Dan McGee wrote:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project The official pacman repository.
The annotated tag, v3.4.2 has been created
at
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Speaking up about this now? I thought I've asked everyone if there was
more for 3.4.2 at least a few times in the last few weeks...
I'll take a look at Jakob's patches for maint.
I thought I did but I couldn't find any
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
be_local.c:70:13: warning: no previous prototype for '_cache_get_filename'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
-Wmissing-prototypes aims to detect global functions that fail to be
declared in header files. Given we probably do not
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org wrote:
The old function was written in a time before we relied on it for nearly
every operation. Since then, we have switched to the archive backend and now
fast parsing is a big deal.
The former function made a per-character call
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org wrote:
This series of patches makes finding a package in our linked list
implementation a whole lot faster, if that search is using the standard
_alpm_pkg_find, which nearly all are (after the first patch).
It does this by adding a
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Pacman's local database format changes with this commit being pushed to
master:
commit 21833d90e26635fdd2c6af247790a9bf374b4d80
Author: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
Date: Sat Oct 30 15:35:43 2010 +1000
Merge
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
In fact I don't like neither force nor epoch. Epoch is just a version
prefix, why don't we let the packager to workaround this (KISS)? We can
introduce a
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
We've putzed around with this a few times, haven't we? This basically
reverts this one:
commit 149839c5391e9a93465f86dbb8d095a0150d755d
Author: Xavier Chantry shinin...@gmail.com
Date: Mon May 26 23:46:01 2008 +0200
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Thomas Bahn thomas-b...@gmx.net wrote:
this patch introduces a question on every repository sync if a am right. So
that patch also asks if you type 'pacman -Syu' ? If it is i would not vote for
this patch, because it's another question you must acknoweledge
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Hi,
If two repos (obviously not both official) provide the same binary package,
pacman will install the package from the repo that is listed first in
pacman.conf, if specified on the command line, e.g. pacman -S foo.
If another
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
My general impression of this is that it is really, really good and a great
improvement over what we have now or had in the past. Here are relatively
minor comments:
The Enter a number selection prompt is a bit weirdly
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 20/10/10 05:10, Xavier Chantry wrote:
If there are multiple providers in one db, pacman used to just stop at
the first one (both during dependency resolution or for pacman -S
'provision' which uses the same code).
I
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
pactree: all the work I did with Dave Reisner on pactree C rewrite,
all ready and done now. depends on depwork for find_satisfier
Cool. Still not sure about moving it to util instead of contrib. It does
not really fit
comments by Xavier is on my working
branch
(http://projects.archlinux.org/users/allan/pacman.git/log/?h=working).
Allan
If we agree on the #if defined .. #elif defined .. #endif , we should
probably do it for the includes too.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
Wouldn't this cause a notable slow-down?
I thought the issue was rather that the local db entries would be
synced when the actual package files are probably not synced.
But if we sync everything, then it's very likely to
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
Nagy and I discussed a bit that topic.
Don't we already read all local depends file for conflict and/or dep
checking ?
So this means we'll now read all local depends + all desc files ?
Why not put epoch stuff in the
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
That is because none of the packages know about epoch yet. You are going
to have to manually update packages that use the force flag for the time
being.
BTW, the db update in [testing] has epoch=1 as the db-4.9
Xyne wrote:
Is the install size shown after each package when ShowSize is enabled? That
would be useful when deciding which package to install. It would be even more
useful to know the cumulative size, i.e. the sum of install sizes of that
package and its own dependencies. I think that would
Florian Pritz wrote:
On 19.10.2010 21:25, Xavier Chantry wrote:
But my new provision selection inspired to both Jakob and Dan that we
could have the same for groups, so I went ahead and implemented it
over the weekend.
Do it like yaourt (it prompts the user when doing -Syu) and open
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Florian Pritz
bluew...@server-speed.net wrote:
Yaourt doesn't have this feature for groups (sadly), but for -Syu. You
can use the editor to select which packages you want to upgrade and with
ones you want to ignore.
I just meant you can do the same thing for
About my pending work on http://code.toofishes.net/cgit/xavier/pacman.git/
parseargs: sent to the ML and updated according to feedback
depwork: forgot if I send this stuff, should I ?
pactree: all the work I did with Dave Reisner on pactree C rewrite,
all ready and done now. depends on depwork
) courier-mta 2) esmtp 3) exim
Which one do you want to install?
Enter a number (default=1):
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
lib/libalpm/alpm.h|1 +
lib/libalpm/deps.c| 28 +-
src/pacman/callback.c | 13 ++
src/pacman/util.c
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:06 PM, toofis...@jabber.org
toofis...@jabber.orgwrote:
5:48 PM me: waoh, where does this come from ? :)
what made you implement epoch ?
toofishes: the stupid bug reports
clicked on one and went ok we have three of these lets fix this shit
5:49 PM it ended up not
the
operation
--print-format string
specify how the targets should be printed
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
src/pacman/pacman.c | 27 ++-
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pacman/pacman.c
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd1.py | 18 ++
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd2.py | 15 +++
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd3.py | 15 +++
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd4.py | 17 +
4 files
From: Florian Pritz bluew...@xssn.at
-dd ignores only the version of a dependency being checked, but not the
package itself.
Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz bluew...@xssn.at
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
doc/pacman.8.txt |1 +
src/pacman/pacman.c
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
I like this.
Cool :)
+ /* First skip all spaces in both strings */
+ while(isspace((unsigned char)*s1))
+ s1++;
+ while(isspace((unsigned char)*s2))
+ s2++;
+ /* If we
the
operation
--print-format string
specify how the targets should be printed
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
src/pacman/pacman.c | 39 ++-
1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src
that you do not
want to keep in a release build, but you want to make sure that the
assert is indeed not triggered while developing / testing.
I updated the patch with an explicit check (I actually already did
this before choosing to use assert) :
http://code.toofishes.net/cgit/xavier/pacman.git/log/?h
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org wrote:
We weren't reading this in from our packages, thus causing us not to write
it out to our local database. Adding this now will help ease the upgrade
path for epoch later and not require reinstallation of all force packages.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org wrote:
We weren't reading this in from our packages, thus causing us not to write
it out to our local database. Adding this now will help ease
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Xavier and I talked about it, and my numbers were a bit flawed due to
having a debug-compiled pacman and comparing it against the system
pacman. We also figured it would help a lot on patches with a slow
stat (Cygwin, etc
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not too thrilled abuot this patch for the fact that we lost alpha
ordering by shortopt for sync/upgrade/remove options. This is a step
backwards in my opinion.
I can deal with the dbpath/root/every single op uses these
the DB entry without touching anything on the file stem.
E.g. this test should be the same as:
pacman -R --dbonly dummy pacman -U --dbonly dummy.pkg.tar.gz
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
doc/pacman.8.txt |2 --
lib/libalpm/remove.c
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd1.py | 15 +++
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd2.py | 15 +++
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd3.py | 15 +++
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
From: Jakob Gruber jakob.gru...@gmail.com
In the following, the letters SRUDQ refer to the corresponding pacman
operations.
Most of the work in this commit is about removing as many options as
possible from the global section and moving them to where they actually
belong.
Additionally,
components together. Duplication is also avoided.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
doc/pacman.8.txt| 110 --
src/pacman/pacman.c | 164 +--
2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 141 deletions
just like in 24fc623e1a8bf905cf0367f9bd40bc5bd6034378 , apply to pmdb
gensync as well.
---
test/pacman/pmdb.py |7 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/pacman/pmdb.py b/test/pacman/pmdb.py
index 41bd738..11083db 100755
--- a/test/pacman/pmdb.py
+++
gensync generated a sync.db file with PKGINFO
syntax, this is not quite what pacman expects.
Also the file was only added to the Server path :
root/var/pub/sync/sync.db
but it was not available in the normal sync db path :
root/var/lib/pacman/sync/sync.db
change gensync() to generate
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I just took these for a spin
al...@mugen /home/arch/code/pacman (epoch)
sudo ./src/pacman/pacman -Syu
snip
Targets (24): blas-3.2.2-2 crafty-23.3-1 db-4.8.26-2
foomatic-db-4.0.5_20100816-1
for -1.
Also slightly changed the second patch to do just once : if (nodeps)
else
http://code.toofishes.net/cgit/xavier/pacman.git/log/?h=sodeps
Xyne wrote:
I'm re-proposing that we scrap groups entirely in favor of metapackages. (I
think I send a message to this list about this over a year ago.)
A metapackage would consist of an empty package (i.e. no installable files
other than pacman metadata). The package would list the
Allan McRae wrote:
One thing I just thought of. If it is going to be separated by
repo could that line say :: group testing/base-devel to improve
clarity?
This is exactly what Jakob reported as inconsistent, but wondered if it was
still ok.
That's funny, we have been arguing for one
priority. I was going to cover them here, but
this will just confuse things and would deserve its own topic/discussion.
Jakob Gruber wrote:
Hi Xavier,
here is yet another revision of the group patches.
http://github.com/schuay/pacman-arch/commits/group_backend
This time it should be easier
Well, one way to avoid all this is to add something like:
[[ $PKGDIR == . ]] $PKGDIR=$startdir
before we preserve the environmental variables. But that is bad as
things like PKGDIR=../ would still cause issues.
I rather meant a way to remove any assumption of PKGDEST being
Allan McRae wrote:
No. It also affects the location of the tarfile. e.g. PKGDEST=.
puts the tar file in $pkgdir because we create the tarball location
using $PKGDEST while in $pkgdir:
cd $pkgdir
...
pkg_file=$PKGDEST/${nameofpkg}-${pkgver}-${pkgrel}-${PKGARCH}${PKGEXT}
...
ok but
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Just to clarify (thanks to Xavier), it worked on BSD but not in OSX which
does not have either readlink -f or realpath...
just found a link that might help :
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1055671/how-can-i-get
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Xavier, any insight or memory why you did it this way?
commit c465d9e848b19b495259c7021a583c29fba92b44
Author: Chantry Xavier shinin...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Apr 17 09:02:11 2008 +0200
pactest : Use tarfile module
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Jakob Gruber jakob.gru...@gmail.com wrote:
I couldn't see how the original test made any sense, so I adjusted it to
test FS#20221 (as specified in commit
e702f56ea671c6cd1154a0ddb41fa63e97587c85).
The old PKG_EXIST rules do nothing because pkg{1,2,3} are
://code.toofishes.net/cgit/xavier/pacman.git/log/?h=working
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I got a conflict too. pacman 3.4.0-2
Great, I am not going mad. But not great, something strange is
happening...
Can you show debug output ?
And libelf is not in any of your sync repo, ie pacman -Si libelf does
not
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Florian Pritz
bluew...@server-speed.net wrote:
On 13.08.2010 20:42, Xavier Chantry wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
I got a conflict too. pacman 3.4.0-2
Great, I am not going mad. But not great, something
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:15 PM, k...@krzd.net wrote:
Sure that in this case you don't need a patch, but where is the problem to
file a simple bug report. Just two lines of text and everything is
allright.
Just my two cents
Please... the developers can talk for themselves...
and these
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto
denisfalqu...@gmail.com wrote:
gpgme is very good when the keyring is the default, or if the requirements
are simple. But for a specialized keyring, like pacman's, it is not
flexible enough. This patch removes the checking of configure.ac.
From: Nico Schottelius n...@kr.ethz.ch
Signed-off-by: Nico Schottelius n...@kr.ethz.ch
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
doc/pacman.8.txt | 19 +++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/pacman.8.txt b/doc/pacman.8.txt
index
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed 30 Jun 2010 20:08 -0430, Andres P wrote:
Also, how do I unsubscribe from this shitty list? ;)
Heyy. Don't be so rude now. The list isn't that bad.
http://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
I always
1 - 100 of 651 matches
Mail list logo
