Re: [pacman-dev] Another idea

2009-01-15 Thread Bryan Ischo
Xavier wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote: Hey all. I've been thinking about my patches and the concerns that list members have had about them and I've come up with a different way of accomplishing the same thing that may be more palatable: -

Re: [pacman-dev] Another idea

2009-01-15 Thread Nagy Gabor
It sounds good, but isn't it a bit a step backward after this : http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commit;h=72c0ab5c51d5119b6f81c768b1a0f6ff499df292 However, we were not considering this new behavior in case of unresolvable dependency back then. We should decide, whether we want