On 09/10/2014 11:18 PM, Adam Kennedy wrote:
I've already started to make some small commits to get Padre building
on the current Strawberry, and once that's done, to add some small
improvements to Makefile support (which I'm doing an annoyingly large
amount of work on these days) and maybe
On 11/09/14 07:50, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
That's cool. I've blogged here:
http://blogs.perl.org/users/kaare/2014/09/padre-is-now-on-github.html
to get the word out.
nice
Kaare++
___
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
Awesome work
kaare+=1 # :)
2014-09-11 11:10 GMT+03:00 kevin dawson ke...@dawson10.plus.com:
On 11/09/14 07:50, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
That's cool. I've blogged here: http://blogs.perl.org/users/
kaare/2014/09/padre-is-now-on-github.html to get the word out.
nice
Kaare++
Thanks for this.
The new repo is neat, especially the Travis hook (which I've never seen
before on GitHub).
I've already started to make some small commits to get Padre building on
the current Strawberry, and once that's done, to add some small
improvements to Makefile support (which I'm doing
Best to keep things moving forwards at this point, we can fix bits and
pieces later.
Next step would be to update http://padre.perlide.org/ to reflect the
new home of the repo. Anyone up for that?
___
Padre-dev mailing list
Padre-dev@perlide.org
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Kaare Rasmussen ka...@jasonic.dk wrote:
Best to keep things moving forwards at this point, we can fix bits and
pieces later.
Next step would be to update http://padre.perlide.org/ to reflect the new
home of the repo. Anyone up for that?
Err, before doing
On 09/09/2014 12:11 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
Err, before doing that I need to make sure the GitHub repo can be used
to update the website.
But I don't think this should stop anyone from improving Padre in the
GitHub repository.
Will you do that? I'm not volunteering for this one. I guess the
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Kaare Rasmussen ka...@jasonic.dk wrote:
On 09/09/2014 12:11 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
Err, before doing that I need to make sure the GitHub repo can be used to
update the website.
But I don't think this should stop anyone from improving Padre in the
GitHub
On 09/09/2014 03:29 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
I'd say it is also very important to make sure that Padre and
its modules can be released from the GitHub repository,
and that those releases already contain the new repo in their
META files.
That can be fixed on
Hi Adam
It looks pretty good to me, except that we don't have a repo for the
main distro.
True; someone told me to wait a bit to see how it goes with the plugins.
But I think better to get it done now. I may loose momentum later.
So I've renamed https://github.com/PadreIDE/Padre to
On 06/09/14 18:07, Adam Kennedy wrote:
It looks pretty good to me, except that we don't have a repo for the
main distro.
But I'd be happy to say lets go ahead with plugins and everything else
being officially in GitHub.
Best to keep things moving forwards at this point, we can fix bits and
On 08/24/2014 08:20 PM, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
On 08/22/2014 09:39 AM, kevin dawson wrote:
I would suggest that we need to process all the additional/support
repos before we do the Padre conversion, that way we can check for
errors, before ...
I've created all projects, except Padre proper,
So this means we can start contributing to the repositories on Github?
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Kaare Rasmussen ka...@jasonic.dk wrote:
On 08/22/2014 09:39 AM, kevin dawson wrote:
I would suggest that we need to process all the additional/support repos
before we do the Padre
I say do the most obvious ones and toss the rest at the point it becomes
too much work.
It's more important that we get it moved over than we retain high fidelity.
Adam
On 22 August 2014 02:26, Claudio Ramirez padre.clau...@apt-get.be wrote:
Well, the ticket convertion project may work. But
On 08/22/2014 09:39 AM, kevin dawson wrote:
I would suggest that we need to process all the additional/support
repos before we do the Padre conversion, that way we can check for
errors, before ...
I've created all projects, except Padre proper, using the autors file
that Kevin sent me. Now
On 24/08/14 19:20, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
I've created all projects, except Padre proper, using the autors file
that Kevin sent me. Now is the time for Padre developers to check if
there are fundamental errors.
As you might suggest, it's an automated approach. This means I can
rewind and
On 22/08/14 05:44, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
As a matter of fact, I've just created
https://github.com/PadreIDE/Acme-Padre-PlayCode. To me it looks ok, as
does Debug-Client.
I can do the rest in a jiffy.
I would suggest that we need to process all the additional/support repos
before we do the
There are some projects on github to migrate bugs/issues from trac to
github. Do we want/need something like that or is it better to start afresh?
C.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:39 AM, kevin dawson ke...@dawson10.plus.com
wrote:
On 22/08/14 05:44, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
As a matter of fact,
On 08/22/2014 09:43 AM, Claudio Ramirez wrote:
There are some projects on github to migrate bugs/issues from trac to
github. Do we want/need something like that or is it better to start
afresh?
The tickets don't seem to contain info about which distro it belongs to.
They're all in one big
On 22/08/14 09:45, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
The tickets don't seem to contain info about which distro it belongs
to. They're all in one big pile. I think it will be a problem if they
are to be converted.
I have know idea if we can even convert the trac tickets and if so how
we would do that,
Well, the ticket convertion project may work. But many of those tickets
will be historical weight and it will take a lot of effort to sort them
out. This gives more space to new tickets on github. I think a huge list of
historical tickets may discourage people of adding new ones.
C.
On Fri, Aug
On 08/22/2014 11:26 AM, Claudio Ramirez wrote:
Well, the ticket convertion project may work. But many of those
tickets will be historical weight and it will take a lot of effort to
sort them out. This gives more space to new tickets on github. I think
a huge list of historical tickets may
On 22/08/14 10:26, Claudio Ramirez wrote:
Well, the ticket convertion project may work. But many of those
tickets will be historical weight and it will take a lot of effort to
sort them out. This gives more space to new tickets on github. I think
a huge list of historical tickets may
As discussed on #padre on irc.perl.org, most Padre-related
distributions are under the same svn repository. I think we want to
preserve commit/author history, but if we're moving to git we might
want to separate those into the independent distributions under the
PadreIDE github organization.
On
I'm playing a little with this, splitting in separate distros and then I
want to create them on github. Alas I don't have the permissions to do
so. It says To create repositories in an organization, you must be a
member of the Owners or Admin teams
Kevin, can you add me as an admin?
On
On 21/08/14 15:20, breno wrote:
As discussed on #padre on irc.perl.org, most Padre-related
distributions are under the same svn repository. I think we want to
preserve commit/author history, but if we're moving to git we might
want to separate those into the independent distributions under the
On 21/08/14 19:30, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
I'm playing a little with this, splitting in separate distros and then
I want to create them on github. Alas I don't have the permissions to
do so. It says To create repositories in an organization, you must be
a member of the Owners or Admin teams
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:08 PM, kevin dawson ke...@dawson10.plus.com wrote:
On 21/08/14 19:30, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
Kevin, can you add me as an admin?
ask mj41 as the last time I tried to add a user, i failed :(
done!
:)
___
Padre-dev mailing
On 08/22/2014 02:08 AM, kevin dawson wrote:
I have already done a single tail conversion, I used svn2git:
https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git
with a command line like:
svn2git http://svn.perlide.org/padre/trunk/Debug-Client/
--no-minimize-url --revision 9656:19772 -v --notags --nobranches
On 08/20/2014 12:53 AM, kevin dawson wrote:
On 19/08/14 21:36, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
On 08/19/2014 09:01 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
Actually, it's there, but it says it's an unofficial clone:
https://github.com/PadreIDE/Padre. Isn't it just a matter of
accepting the PadreIDE group on github as
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Sebastian Willing s...@cpan.org wrote:
SVN commit bits are pretty easy to get: Create a patch, submit it via Trac
and get it accepted.
Actually, the #irc trac registration thing doesn't seem to work out
nowadays. It's a high threshold for some people. More
On 08/19/2014 09:01 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
Actually, it's there, but it says it's an unofficial clone:
https://github.com/PadreIDE/Padre. Isn't it just a matter of accepting
the PadreIDE group on github as the official maintainers?
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Claudio Ramirez
On 19/08/14 21:36, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
On 08/19/2014 09:01 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
Actually, it's there, but it says it's an unofficial clone:
https://github.com/PadreIDE/Padre. Isn't it just a matter of accepting
the PadreIDE group on github as the official maintainers?
Kaare
there is a
33 matches
Mail list logo
