I've heard that vbr is actually better for ripping than vbr!
- Original Message -
From: stever2525 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. Pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 9:17 PM
Subject: CBR or VBR
What is the advantage of choosing CBR or VBR when ripping
: Saturday, June 24, 2006 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: CBR or VBR
hi
vbr makes a smaller file. you set limits as to how much data it will
encode,
say between 96 and 192 kbps. the encoder will analyze the music and do
what
it thinks is good quality encoding between those specified limits
for things like books.
Don Roberts
- Original Message -
From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: CBR or VBR
But I've heard that with vbr, you do get a smaller file, but the
nature of
variable
discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: CBR or VBR
Although I cannot prove it, my ears suggest that this is true in
theory but not in reality. There are some purists on this and
other lists who think that because mp3 or ogg or wma as well as
others
What is the advantage of choosing CBR or VBR when ripping?
thank you
___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This list is a service
hi
vbr makes a smaller file. you set limits as to how much data it will encode,
say between 96 and 192 kbps. the encoder will analyze the music and do what
it thinks is good quality encoding between those specified limits. the
advantage of that is you get a smaller file. the advantage of cbr is
