Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
The following message from pd-cvs has no cvs log. Is this normal?
Modified Files:
ringbuffer.c ringbuffer.h
Log Message:
Many bug fixes
isn't Many bug fixes a cvs log?
if you are wondering, why there have been no diffs between r1.11 and
r1.12 in the
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
The following message from pd-cvs has no cvs log. Is this normal?
isn't Many bug fixes a cvs log?
woops, i wanted to say diff, but I did not say diff.
if you are wondering, why there have been no diffs between r1.11
Bugs item #1556206, was opened at 2006-09-11 11:18
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1556206group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
I support this idea, but I have to say the biggest challenge will be social, not technical. I think in order for it to succeed, you will have to submit things in small, incremental patches. I think that it would be best to work on the MAIN branch in CVS, i.e. Miller's branch. But you should
On Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 02:21:33PM +0200, Vincent Lordier wrote:
Hi enthusiasts devs !
I want to work on pd's code readability and structure, only refactoring, not
adding new features. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refactoring)
The final goal is to make PD easy to scale (desactivate MIDI,
So, supposing you want to work with MillerWhy no ?As long as the developments are not made under closed doors (= frequents commits / test releases / bug submits ), I'm willing to work with anyone.
To me, I shouldn't have to work with Miller or work with Mathieu or anything like this, simply
hi vincent ...
That implies a primary work on architecture and a cooperation of all
devs (commit often, criticize, propose, improve, test, submit
patches, ...).
I'll develop on architecture on other posts soon, but I want to first
focus on making the best out of what we have today.
well,
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I was thinking that it would be nice to have [once] accept a single
argument which would set the initial state of the object, just like
[spigot]. But this means that it would have to be default closed like
spigot, breaking backwards
1. Does communication imply collaboration?
does collaboration work without communication?
2. Does collaboration imply everybody on the same branch?
a-b = ¬b-¬a
the diff between devel and vanilla are several thousand lines of code
... and still increasing, mainly because of the
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, so you want to extend the tentacles of Pd's caste system further?
Abstractions for the plebe, externals for gentlemen.
It looks like you didn't read that line of mine below?
Don't accept Pd's
10 matches
Mail list logo
