Tim Blechmann wrote:
i am not really a fan of removing people from a project, but maybe one
could distinguish between 'active' and 'retired' developers ... retired
developers should loose their cvs access, but still kept in the
sourceforge developer lists ...
i agree with hans that i don't
Hi
On 11 Sep 2007, at 09:03, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Steffen wrote:
On 11/09/2007, at 0.29, Thomas O Fredericks wrote:
I think I found two errors on the first line of code of http://
www.puredata.info/docs/developer/sf_project
And there seam to be more errors - or obsoleteness - in that
David Plans Casal wrote:
a documentation duplication can be found at
http://puredata.info/dev/cvs, where the information is correct.
Hrm. Perhaps we could merge? or is that page duplicated for a reason?
no! you might break the carefully thought of layout :-)
mfga.sdr
IOhannes
PS: i
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 9:47 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
That sounds quite handy. It should definitely be in some lib
somewhere.
well, it already is in some lib: toxy (my patch is really just one of
the example-patches slightly modified)
Unfortunately, it
hi.
after the talk about svn at the pd-con, it seems like there is a general
ok from the community, if somebody would be willing to perform the
actual migration.
actually i could be this volunteer.
ad miller: there exist migration paths from both cvs and svn to git, so
svn would do no harm
Hi,
sounds very reasonable to me.
The only potential problem that i see is the flat hierarchy (resp.
naming scheme) of the branches and tags. It seems that this folder
would populate quite fast and might quickly become a mess. On the
other hand it's quite easy to clean it up again with svn
Am 11.09.2007 um 17:04 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi,
sounds very reasonable to me.
The only potential problem that i see is the flat hierarchy
(resp. naming scheme) of the branches and tags. It seems that
this folder would populate quite fast and might quickly
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i regret that i do not fully understand this request either. while both
of them have contributed a lot and chances are high that they would be
contributing if they were still with us, i do not see a point in
treating them as if they were still
Am 11.09.2007 um 19:58 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
- desiredatapd-devel live beside pd (not in a separate branch)
If Thomas hasn't changed his mind, pd-devel is going to be obsolete
soon. The latest changes still have to be picked up from there and
moved somewhere else, such as sf.net
Hallo,
Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
If Thomas hasn't changed his mind, pd-devel is going to be obsolete soon.
The latest changes still have to be picked up from there and moved
somewhere else, such as sf.net patchtracker and the desiredata branch, but
for all
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
- moved abstractionsextensionsxguiFramestein into externals
good thing, as long as abstractions does not become a subfolder of
externals... but I would rather have it under a common name that isn't
abstractions nor
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
David Plans Casal wrote:
a documentation duplication can be found at
http://puredata.info/dev/cvs, where the information is correct.
Hrm. Perhaps we could merge? or is that page duplicated for a reason?
no! you might break the carefully
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Martin Peach wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
I propose that we leave Gerard van Dongen and Jamie Tittle on the
list since they are still with us
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I guess that I am the only sentimental one here. I just thought it would
be a nice gesture to leave them there.
Oh, I'm sentimental as well. I'm just not sure which gesture would be
the right one to express this.
14 matches
Mail list logo
