Hi,
I'm having problems with oggamp~. I have 5 ogg streams coming into PD at
the same time. After a while (10/15 minutes) the incoming streams just
stop, even though they're still broadcasting.
Maybe i'm using oggamp wrong?
Or is there an alternative?
I'm using Linux ubuntu, but it's also no
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Plus, what about adding Gem back to the main pure-data repository?
why?
- everything else is in that repository
?
- makes for one checkout for everything
see my random mentions of svn:externals
- makes it easy to make branches and tags for the whole
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
however, once we have moved to SVN i would like to make an
experimental branch of pd-extended to re-work the entire build-system
into small (managable) pieces that are modular and survive directory
re-structuring.
i know that you are not really interested
Hey Hans++,
I'm happy to see debs in the nightly builds!!! yay!!!
One question though, have the debs been properly updated? As in etch is
stable?
I think it would make more sense to use the proper names on debian, so
we have an idea of exactly what distro they are for, even when a testing
turns
On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:06 AM, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Does SVN handle this differently?
yes and now.
yes: you don't _have_ to create a tag and a branch whenever you
import code.
no: you can import code that is maintained elsewhere into a branch,
a tag, the trunk (or just any other
don't load in pd-extended 20070913
Initial Comment:
Here is the verbose PD output, looks like many externals are simply not in the
.deb?
input channels = 2, output channels = 2
opened 0 MIDI input device(s) and 0 MIDI output device(s).
input channels = 2, output channels = 2
opened /dev/dsp
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i don't see a reason why desiredata should move out again into a
separate repository, unless they wish to do so.
I don't see a reason either. I don't know why Hans is suggesting that.
Perhaps it has to do with access control, but I don't
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
If you want so much to remove existing tags and branches, what is that a
sign of? Is SVN appropriate for handling projects that have many tags
and branches?
why should svn be
Yes, they are up to date. I was wondering which name newbies would
find easier to understand. In Debian, I think the words stable and
testing are used more. In Ubuntu, the names are more important.
That's why I named them that way.
.hc
On Sep 13, 2007, at 11:29 AM, B. Bogart wrote:
On Sep 13, 2007, at 5:07 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
however, once we have moved to SVN i would like to make an
experimental branch of pd-extended to re-work the entire build-
system into small (managable) pieces that are modular and survive
directory
On Sep 13, 2007, at 4:49 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i don't see a reason why desiredata should move out again into a
separate repository, unless they wish to do so.
I don't see a reason either. I don't know why Hans is suggesting
that.
On Sep 13, 2007, at 5:07 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
however, once we have moved to SVN i would like to make an
experimental branch of pd-extended to re-work the entire build-
system into small (managable) pieces that are modular and survive
directory
12 matches
Mail list logo
