Bugs item #1796223, was opened at 2007-09-17 15:49
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1796223group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
SourceForge.net wrote:
Bugs item #1738289, was opened at 2007-06-16 12:06
File Added: array_viewlist.diff
i was just wondering: when a bug-report gets a fix (e.g. a patch-file),
should it be moved from the bugs section to the patches section or
should it stay within the bugs.
the question
I have only done this in Linux, but here are some thoughts:
- are your device numbers *really* 2 and 13? In my experience, they start
at 1, and are numbered sequentially, meaning that you'd have to have a lot
of sound cards in your system to get all the way up to 13.
- when you list channels,
On Sep 17, 2007, at 8:34 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
SourceForge.net wrote:
Bugs item #1738289, was opened at 2007-06-16 12:06
File Added: array_viewlist.diff
i was just wondering: when a bug-report gets a fix (e.g. a patch-
file),
should it be moved from the bugs section to the
Hey!!!
Who fixed PDDP link?!?!!? (to look like a real link!)
A huge thanks to whoever did the work.
I have a couple of suggestions though:
1. It should turn purple when the link is visited (as the ol standard)
(-fill #551a8b)
2. It should have an underline to look like a real hyperlink, so
On 13 Sep 2007, at 16:08, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
A cool thing I've been doing recently with the externals feature
is using them more like symlinks; so for portaudio you can put the
revision you want to stay static in a central location ( e.g. /
svnexternals/portaudio) and then
On 14 Sep 2007, at 05:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
One last comment on this topic: since SVN is supposed to handle moves
so well, why don't we defer the very contensious issues of
reogranizing the directories and tags/branches until after we have
the SVN repository working nicely? It
Ah well, that's what I've done.
Cheers,
Ed
Charles Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It will not work. Here is our
function prototype:
EXTERN void *copybytes(void *src, size_t nbytes);
The thing to see here, is that it doesn't actually copy the data to a
location you specify. It creates a copy
