[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1822007 ] hardcoded sample-type in jack-transport

2007-10-29 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #1822007, was opened at 2007-10-29 11:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1822007group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy

[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1822010 ] hardcoded sample-type in soundfile-IO

2007-10-29 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #1822010, was opened at 2007-10-29 11:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=1822010group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy

Re: [PD-dev] working towards Pd-0.40.3-extended

2007-10-29 Thread Steffen Juul
On 28/10/2007, at 1.35, Steffen Juul wrote: I've been meaning to try that for quite some time. That and then apply some of the patches that i like. We'll see how it goes, when it goes. I had success building pd-0.41-0test06 for Intel Mac OS X. What I did was: - Made the following symlinks

Re: [PD-dev] working towards Pd-0.40.3-extended

2007-10-29 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Steffen Juul hat gesagt: // Steffen Juul wrote: This was the building part. Now the apply patches part. Before i blast it all i'd like to know if i could be of any help wrt pd- extended? Is the next Pd-extended aimaed at the 0.41 version of Pd or the 0.40 version? Are there any

Re: [PD-dev] working towards Pd-0.40.3-extended

2007-10-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 29, 2007, at 6:42 AM, Steffen Juul wrote: On 28/10/2007, at 1.35, Steffen Juul wrote: I've been meaning to try that for quite some time. That and then apply some of the patches that i like. We'll see how it goes, when it goes. I had success building pd-0.41-0test06 for Intel Mac

Re: [PD-dev] getting the classname in an class

2007-10-29 Thread Miller Puckette
Hmm, well, the way Pd gets it is looking in the binbuf. But perhaps you need to look in the binbuf for the object you're looking at, not that of the containing canvas, no? Or, on the other hand. perhaps you're trying to get the name of the abstraction the object is part of? cheers M On Sun,

[PD-dev] pdp's mmx support

2007-10-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I just saw that PDP has some MMX assembly (old school ;). Do you think it would be worth turning on, even tho MMX seems to be deprecated? The code is in externals/pdp/system/mmx Auto-vectorization only got about 5 or 6 loops. .hc

[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1822220 ] include PDP MMX support, and turn on compiler optimizatons

2007-10-29 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #180, was opened at 2007-10-29 13:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=180group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy

Re: [PD-dev] getting the classname in an class

2007-10-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Miller Puckette wrote: Hmm, well, the way Pd gets it is looking in the binbuf. But perhaps you need to look in the binbuf for the object you're looking at, not that of the containing canvas, no? Or, on the other hand. perhaps you're trying to get the name of the abstraction the object is

Re: [PD-dev] getting the classname in an class

2007-10-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: We have a winner! :D darn, i just finished an example that works as well fmasdr. IOhannes /** * * myname - implementation file * * copyleft (c) IOhannes m zm-bölnig-A * *

Re: [PD-dev] pdp's mmx support

2007-10-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I just saw that PDP has some MMX assembly (old school ;). Do you think it would be worth turning on, even tho MMX seems to be deprecated? why is MMX deprecated? especially, why do you consider MMX deprecated when there is no SSE2 code instead? mfg.asdr

Re: [PD-dev] pdp's mmx support

2007-10-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 29, 2007, at 1:38 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I just saw that PDP has some MMX assembly (old school ;). Do you think it would be worth turning on, even tho MMX seems to be deprecated? why is MMX deprecated? especially, why do you consider MMX

Re: [PD-dev] pdp's mmx support

2007-10-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 29, 2007, at 3:10 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Well, AFAIK, there is no further development on MMX, while there is with there is: it is called SSE SSE. And it seems that SSE is meant to replace MMX, instead of complement it. Plus if IIRC, MMX

Re: [PD-dev] getting the classname in an class

2007-10-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Perhaps atom_getsymbol(binbuf_getvec(x-x_obj.te_binbuf)) could be defined in m_pd.h as something like class_getclassname this is along the lines of what i tried to suggest in my initial reply to this thread (in the sf-ticket) in addition to that i would like

Re: [PD-dev] pdp's mmx support

2007-10-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Well, AFAIK, there is no further development on MMX, while there is with there is: it is called SSE SSE. And it seems that SSE is meant to replace MMX, instead of complement it. Plus if IIRC, MMX has some serious drawbacks to it. It i don't know of

Re: [PD-dev] working towards Pd-0.40.3-extended

2007-10-29 Thread Steffen Juul
On 29/10/2007, at 14.07, Frank Barknecht wrote: Steffen Juul hat gesagt: // Steffen Juul wrote: This was the building part. Now the apply patches part. Before i blast it all i'd like to know if i could be of any help wrt pd- extended? Is the next Pd-extended aimaed at the 0.41 version of Pd

Re: [PD-dev] working towards Pd-0.40.3-extended

2007-10-29 Thread Steffen Juul
On 29/10/2007, at 16.10, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: First off, you'll have much better luck with this Tcl/Tk than the Apple ones. The included ones are quite old, this is what I just upgraded the auto-builds to: http://idmi.poly.edu/pdlab/tcltk/ Not asking where you dug that up.

Re: [PD-dev] pdp's mmx support

2007-10-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Do MMX and SSE have different instruction sets? If so, is SSE preferred over MMX? yes they have different instruction sets: MMX can only handle integer values, while SSE can only handle floating point values. (only SSE2 added floating point support) SSE2 is

Re: [PD-dev] getting the classname in an class

2007-10-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I think this should be part of the standard save mechanism, so I just committed the change to a bunch of externals. I didn't touch externals/iem since I know you guys like to handle stuff yourself. It actually makes sense like this (from entry.c): static void entry_save(t_gobj *z,

Re: [PD-dev] getting the classname in an class

2007-10-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 29, 2007, at 3:16 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Perhaps atom_getsymbol(binbuf_getvec(x-x_obj.te_binbuf)) could be defined in m_pd.h as something like class_getclassname this is along the lines of what i tried to suggest in my initial reply to this

Re: [PD-dev] working towards Pd-0.40.3-extended

2007-10-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 29, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Steffen Juul wrote: On 29/10/2007, at 16.10, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: First off, you'll have much better luck with this Tcl/Tk than the Apple ones. The included ones are quite old, this is what I just upgraded the auto-builds to:

[PD-dev] pdtk_canvas_click and focus

2007-10-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Anyone know why the focus statement below only applies to GNU/Linux? This would make life much easier on Mac OS X when writing GUIs that handle focus: proc pdtk_canvas_click {name x y b f} { global pd_nt if {$pd_nt == 0} {focus $name} pd [canvastosym $name] mouse [$name