Bugs item #1371511, was opened at 2005-12-01 23:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=1371511group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think its a really bad idea to name functions using names that have
existing in standard headers for decades, especially when that header is
i do not recall any function in pd with a name y1().
it is a simple stupid variable, with a _quite_ descriptive name
On Oct 19, 2006, at 4:02 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think its a really bad idea to name functions using names that
have existing in standard headers for decades, especially when
that header is
i do not recall any function in pd with a name y1().
it is
SourceForge.net wrote:
Comment By: Mathieu Bouchard (matju)
Date: 2006-10-18 09:47
Whatever about calling functions y0,y1,yn, they've been
there since almost the beginning of unix. They're Bessel
functions defined in math.h. You won't be able to move
them out of it.
oh, i see. i didn't know
