Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I have to say that I don't want to use google. I think they are the
next microsoft+big brother. Other than that, I am not too particular.
Agreed. Also moving to some other Sourceforge with a different name
IMO isn't
On Mar 2, 2007, at 11:53 AM, David Plans Casal wrote:
On 2 Mar 2007, at 09:19, Georg Holzmann wrote:
Finally, does anyone have any opinions on http://code.google.com
as a
cantidate? It would perhaps lighten your load, IOhannes (in that
you
wouldn't have to assemble the server at
Sorry, I thought you'd been added. What's your sourceforge ID? I
couldn't find it.
.hc
On Mar 1, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
OK, well if this is not quite ready to be discussed, could someone at
least add me to the dev list? (or write a counter proposal for my non
Hallo IOhannes,
My username on sourceforge is lukeiannini. Creative!
Thanks!
Luke
On 3/2/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi.
Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Haha, please look at the first message in (or the subject of) this
thread... we have gone far off topic : )
ah yes,
OK, well if this is not quite ready to be discussed, could someone at
least add me to the dev list? (or write a counter proposal for my non
admission : ))
Thanks,
Luke
On 2/23/07, Luke Iannini (pd) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/15/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
carmen wrote:
On Feb 17, 2007, at 5:32 PM, Eric Lyon wrote:
the (future SVN) repository a bit
differently: A default member would just get write access to one
(SVN) directory. Then e.g. Luke could put his abstractions and the
mmonoplayer and whatever comes up there, pd-extended could still
collect it. I
Hi
On 15 Feb 2007, at 15:35, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Yes, but how many developers are active ATM ?
I don't think that much more than 10 commited something in the last
month ...
Again I think this is even more reason to handle write-everywhere
permissions a bit less liberal according to a
carmen wrote:
I'd also still be interested in getting us over to Subversion, if
there is still a supportive group for this? I've maintained several
SVN repos now, and feel a bit more up to the task of organizing the
project.
there are definitely a lot of supporters for this.
i think the main
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 09:59:59AM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i'd be more interested in moving us over to Git, so i can stop getting
these emails.
why would these emails stop more if we were using Git than they would
if we were using svn?
I could be wrong, but I think git is a
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
hardware, backups and the like (even if we only means me)
the bad thing is that sourceforge is really overloaded.
the good thing about the 2nd is, that the repository is under our full
control. we can also use the
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
hardware, backups and the like (even if we only means me)
the bad thing is that sourceforge is really overloaded.
the good thing about the 2nd is, that the repository is under our full
control. we
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 13:55 +0100, Georg Holzmann wrote:
Of course we would loose the possibility that everyone can quickly
fix
a bug everywhere, but then, I don't see this as such a big problem.
There still would be trusted core developers with access to almost
everything - or maybe we
Hallo,
Georg Holzmann hat gesagt: // Georg Holzmann wrote:
I think this is only a good idea if there were already problems, that
other developers broke things ... which I cannot really remember.
If not, it will only prevent some people from developing, trying to
improve other code,
Hallo,
Tim Blechmann hat gesagt: // Tim Blechmann wrote:
it would have the advantage, that there is a certain amount of quality
assurance, so no one messes with other people's code ...
but i guess your observation is correct, currently the cvs is not used
as version control system, but
Hallo!
Just to give some numbers: Currently we have 59 developers according
to http://sourceforge.net/projects/pure-data and I just saw, that some
like said Eric Lyon are still missing - at least I do know *him*
personally ;) - so we are already past 60!
Yes, but how many developers are
Hallo,
Georg Holzmann hat gesagt: // Georg Holzmann wrote:
Hallo!
Just to give some numbers: Currently we have 59 developers according
to http://sourceforge.net/projects/pure-data and I just saw, that some
like said Eric Lyon are still missing - at least I do know *him*
personally ;) - so
On Wed Feb 14, 2007 at 03:15:10PM -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Sorry, posted this to the wrong list the first time. Thanks Frank
Hallo,
I'd like to be added to the CVS dev list, such that I can begin
posting a few of the publicly-useful abstractions I've been working
on, and
17 matches
Mail list logo
