For the next release of Pd-extended, I think we should release it
under the GPL v3, so I am asking to see if there are any objections.
This is my understanding of what this would mean: the only real added
restriction would be that things included in Pd-extended could not be
licensed GPL v2
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey all,
I am thinking of changing my license to GPLv3. The only forseeable
problem would be if people have taken out the or (at your option)
any later version from the standard GPLv2 text, thereby tying the
code to only the GPLv2.
is there a reason for
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
is there a reason for this switch? (apart from staying current)
i haven't followed the discussion about GPLv3 in the last month, but
last time i did it was _very_ controversial...
It's not that controversial anymore as I
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I am thinking of changing my license to GPLv3. The only forseeable
problem would be if people have taken out the or (at your option) any
later version from the standard GPLv2 text, thereby tying the code to
only the GPLv2.
Does anyone know
