Re: [PD-dev] corelibs, build system

2006-10-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:30 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: did not ask at all. d_mayer_fft.c is the name of the file in 0.39.2. You have broken compilation for Pd-extended. because corelibs IS broken, even without my changes (which tried to fix what was going

Re: [PD-dev] corelibs, build system

2006-10-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: what i did (try to) do, was to modify your build system in a way, that it could handle both cases. (and the build system has serious problems with this) Is this urgent? well no, but pd-0.40.1 is out now... How about waiting until we get the 0.39.2

Re: [PD-dev] corelibs, build system

2006-10-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: did not ask at all. d_mayer_fft.c is the name of the file in 0.39.2. You have broken compilation for Pd-extended. because corelibs IS broken, even without my changes (which tried to fix what was going on) Check the build logs from the auto-build farm for the

Re: [PD-dev] corelibs, build system

2006-09-27 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Sep 27, 2006, at 4:27 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: a lot of time setting up. I really don't want to have to use ACLs in CVS, but you are leaving me no other choice. why don't you want to use ACLs if you want ACLs? Because I thought I could trust the Pd

[PD-dev] corelibs, build system

2006-09-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
corelibs is currently broken due to a renaming of pd/src/d_mayer_fft.c to pd/src/d_fft_mayer.c while i updated the corelibs/generate.sh script to handle this, it still does not really work with the autobuild-system. the reason for this is (imo) the very complicated stacking of Makefiles

Re: [PD-dev] corelibs, build system

2006-09-26 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
IOhannes, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE! ASK BEFORE YOU MESS WITH SOMEONE ELSE'S STUFF!!! This is one of the most basic and fundamental rules of working together, and you are violating this rule again and again, though we ask you not to! That is why we have this list.