Re: [PD-dev] string type for pd

2007-02-05 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Feb 3, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Martin Peach wrote: Bryan Jurish wrote: morning Martin, morning list, just a note: I've patched the pd-0.40-2 source re-compiled here (separate build, not related to my flext problems mentioned in another thread;-)), and I'm still triggering the #error at line

Re: [PD-dev] string type for pd

2007-02-04 Thread Bryan Jurish
moin Martin, On 2007-02-04 00:40:03, Martin Peach [EMAIL PROTECTED] appears to have written: Bryan Jurish wrote: at any rate, a thousand thanks for your work, and I'm looking forward to playing with real strings in pd! Good to know I've done something useful for once! I guess my

Re: [PD-dev] string type for pd

2007-02-04 Thread Martin Peach
Bryan Jurish wrote: moin Martin, On 2007-02-04 00:40:03, Martin Peach [EMAIL PROTECTED] appears to have written: Bryan Jurish wrote: at any rate, a thousand thanks for your work, and I'm looking forward to playing with real strings in pd! Good to know I've done something

Re: [PD-dev] string type for pd

2007-02-03 Thread Bryan Jurish
morning Martin, morning list, just a note: I've patched the pd-0.40-2 source re-compiled here (separate build, not related to my flext problems mentioned in another thread;-)), and I'm still triggering the #error at line 11 of str.c (apparently induced because !defined(t_string)), despite the

Re: [PD-dev] string type for pd

2007-02-03 Thread Martin Peach
Bryan Jurish wrote: morning Martin, morning list, just a note: I've patched the pd-0.40-2 source re-compiled here (separate build, not related to my flext problems mentioned in another thread;-)), and I'm still triggering the #error at line 11 of str.c (apparently induced because

Re: [PD-dev] string type for pd

2007-01-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Martin Peach wrote: Thomas Grill wrote: Hi Martin, many thanks for your initiative, it is greatly appreciated! yes, me too! The [str] object contains the other functions, you can see them in str.c in /externals/mrpeach/str. i think that if pd provides the infrastructure, then it also

[PD-dev] string type for pd

2007-01-27 Thread Martin Peach
I have implemented a string type for Pure Data as well as a [str] object that uses it. For it to work, pd needs to be patched. The [str] is contained in a separate file but the infrastructural changes are part of pd. I have attached a patch file for anyone interested. If it is acceptable,

Re: [PD-dev] string type for pd

2007-01-27 Thread Thomas Grill
Hi Martin, many thanks for your initiative, it is greatly appreciated! It would be extremely useful to also define some API for string handling right from the start, to be able to use the string type in externals... all those functionality that seems to be contained in your str object.

Re: [PD-dev] string type for pd

2007-01-27 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Yeah, sounds cool indeed. If you want to try it in the Pd-extended builds, add the patch to packages/patches with a descriptive name and the version of Pd is was diffed from. (just don't add it to the 0.39.2 release branch ;) Those patches are automatically applied as part of the