Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 21:26 +, martin.pe...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Spoke too soon. On Debian setting the buffer to any size always
returns me 2048, so that's no good.
On WinXP some values (1,2) do what you said. Others (10,12) don't. I'm
not sure what to do about that. It
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 18:49 -0400, Martin Peach wrote:
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 21:26 +, martin.pe...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Spoke too soon. On Debian setting the buffer to any size always
returns me 2048, so that's no good.
On WinXP some values (1,2) do what you said.
Well I'm trying to get rid of the bugs in it...
I don't get that on WinXP though (Pd 0.41.4-extended). I set the buffer to 12
and still received 30 bytes.
On Debian with Pd 0.41.4-extended I get two separate messages (each longer than
12) but still all the data arrives.
Martin
From:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 20:33 +, martin.pe...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Well I'm trying to get rid of the bugs in it...
I don't get that on WinXP though (Pd 0.41.4-extended). I set the
buffer to 12 and still received 30 bytes.
On Debian with Pd 0.41.4-extended I get two separate messages (each
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 21:26 +, martin.pe...@sympatico.ca wrote:
Spoke too soon. On Debian setting the buffer to any size always
returns me 2048, so that's no good.
On WinXP some values (1,2) do what you said. Others (10,12) don't. I'm
not sure what to do about that. It seems to be the OS.
20:33:15 +
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] [tcpserver]: new 'clientbuf' method seems to be
buggy
Well I'm trying to get rid of the bugs in it...
I don't get that on WinXP though (Pd 0.41.4-extended). I set the
buffer to 12 and still received 30 bytes.
On Debian with Pd 0.41.4-extended I get two
