Re: [PD-dev] width control breaks parsing with [textfile]

2013-07-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
On 07/01/2013 09:04 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-06-29 15:43, Roman Haefeli wrote: I don't know any solution off-hand and I also don't know whether Pd was designed with the possibility in mind to read patches with [textfile]. I just want

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread Antoine Villeret
Hi Martin, thanks for that, but I don't know how many clients there are so it's quite difficult to figure out port number in this case. My problem is that I can't listen several time on the same port with [udpreceive] but with multicasting, that's why I switched to [udpserver]. thanks a -- do

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread Antoine Villeret
2013/7/3 Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com On Die, 2013-07-02 at 20:38 +0200, Antoine Villeret wrote: Hi roman, the code around networking object are some workarounds for differents bugs, the first was a crash when client number reach 32, but it seems to be fixed, I can't reproduce

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread Antoine Villeret
yep, a software shouldn't crash in theory but in real life, I should take crash into account and find some way to restart the system in a working state as fast as possible (so that, nobody suffers from the crash). another solution is to correct all bugs, but it's too hard for me :-) (and many are

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 12:56 +0200, Antoine Villeret wrote: then I tried udpserver which doesn't work (at least the version in the pd's SVN) then I switch to tcpserver and I got a lots of troubles... Things look good as long as

[PD-dev] [pure-data:bugs] #1092 tcpserver crashes with more than 32 connexion

2013-07-03 Thread Antoine Villeret
--- ** [bugs:#1092] tcpserver crashes with more than 32 connexion ** **Status:** open **Created:** Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:01 PM UTC by Antoine Villeret **Last Updated:** Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:01 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody tcpserver crashes when there is already 32 connexion and new client tries to

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread Martin Peach
On 2013-07-03 06:37, Antoine Villeret wrote: Hi Martin, thanks for that, but I don't know how many clients there are so it's quite difficult to figure out port number in this case. My problem is that I can't listen several time on the same port with [udpreceive] but with multicasting, that's

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread Antoine Villeret
sorry I was not clear enough I need a server : listening on one port and sending data to client on different port i first use only udpsend/udpreceive and the 'server' was sending to a multicast group, each client join this group and receive all the data this is not possible with unicast while I

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-07-03 15:58, Antoine Villeret wrote: sorry I was not clear enough I need a server : listening on one port and sending data to client on different port i first use only udpsend/udpreceive and the 'server' was sending to a multicast group,

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-07-03 16:12, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: i guess you meant [tcpserver] instead of [udpserver]. in any case, i'm thinking about removing the multi-client feature of iemnet's [udpserver] just to make sure: i did mean [udpserver] (which

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread Antoine Villeret
thanks for that, in fact, some of my clients need the same infos and this is why I first try to do multicasting but reaching multiple clients on the same host is different than addressing one packet to different hosts... for now all my clients try to connect around each 10 second to server to

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread Martin Peach
Well [udpreceive] should be able to receive from many different senders, no? (It's a bug if not...) Based on what the [udpreceive] receives, route your replies to one or more [udpsend]s based on info in the incoming packets, or set the port of a single [udpsend] before sending. UDP is

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-07-03 17:33, Antoine Villeret wrote: so it could be difficult to use a server which doesn't accept more than one connection... no that's not what i meant. you can have as many connections as you want, but they cannot be maintained at the

Re: [PD-dev] SIGPIPE on iemnet's tcpserver

2013-07-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-07-03 17:44, Martin Peach wrote: Well [udpreceive] should be able to receive from many different senders, no? (It's a bug if not...) Based on what the [udpreceive] receives, route your replies to one or more [udpsend]s based on info in

Re: [PD-dev] width control breaks parsing with [textfile]

2013-07-03 Thread Miller Puckette
Just to stir the pot, as it were :) - The 'f' message is intended to mean 'format' and could be expanded to specify font style and size, and/or other formatting info (perhaps even to suppress carriage return on semi, think of that!) cheers Miller On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:48:30AM -0400,

Re: [PD-dev] width control breaks parsing with [textfile]

2013-07-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-07-03 17:58, Miller Puckette wrote: Just to stir the pot, as it were :) - The 'f' message is intended to mean 'format' and could be expanded to specify font style and size, and/or other formatting info (perhaps even to suppress carriage

Re: [PD-dev] width control breaks parsing with [textfile]

2013-07-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mit, 2013-07-03 at 08:58 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: Just to stir the pot, as it were :) - The 'f' message is intended to mean 'format' and could be expanded to specify font style and size, and/or other formatting info (perhaps even to suppress carriage return on semi, think of that!)

Re: [PD-dev] width control breaks parsing with [textfile]

2013-07-03 Thread Miller Puckette
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 09:09:26PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Mit, 2013-07-03 at 08:58 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: Just to stir the pot, as it were :) - The 'f' message is intended to mean 'format' and could be expanded to specify font style and size, and/or other formatting info