Re: [PD] bandlimited oscillators: set of abstractions

2007-03-18 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: while this topic is coming up again from time to time, i made a little set of abstractions, that generate bandlimited standard waveforms using table look-up. Maybe you want to rip apart the [singleton] abstraction that's part of

Re: [PD] bandlimited oscillators: set of abstractions

2007-03-18 Thread Derek Holzer
Hi Roman, Roman Haefeli wrote: oops, you are right. then i should say: 'it was my plan to use only internals'. however, i am sure, that a raw square-wave can be generated without [~]. i'll change that. thanks for notifying me. I've had several students on both windows and OS X that had

Re: [PD] bandlimited oscillators: set of abstractions

2007-03-18 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 09:47 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: Maybe you want to rip apart the [singleton] abstraction that's part of [sssad] to automatically create the table-abstractions once and only once per running Pd? it's in the CVS at /abstractions/footils/sssad/_sssad/ and you need these

Re: [PD] bandlimited oscillators: set of abstractions

2007-03-18 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 09:47 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: Maybe you want to rip apart the [singleton] abstraction that's part of [sssad] to automatically create the table-abstractions once and only once per running Pd? it's in the

[PD] a small utility: dispatcher.pd

2007-03-18 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hi, attached is a small, simple, but very useful helper abstraction: [dispatcher] makes building those long [route method1 method2 method3] chains behind abstraction inlets a bit easier and also works around the problem of adding methods later on without breaking existing connections. Ciao --

Re: [PD] Call for Students: PD projects in Google Summer of Code

2007-03-18 Thread Kyle Klipowicz
Well I just got laid off from my job on Friday, so now I'm thinking about devoting some time to the summer of code myself. How could I apply? ~Kyle On 3/16/07, Kyle Klipowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is interesting news, for sure! ~Kyle On 3/16/07, Georg Holzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PD] compiling GEM (cubeArray.cpp: No such file or directory)

2007-03-18 Thread Item State
no one? this is getting rather urgent now ... if anyone can point me to a few-days-old (after the pix_offset fix) Gem.pd_darwin binary, i'd be very happy ! thanks , -sciss- --- Item State [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, thanks, i unchecked all the missing source files (were quite a few more),

Re: [PD] Compilation of externals on Mac-Intel

2007-03-18 Thread marius schebella
ok, then I don't know... I had some problems with python versions, because I had installed 2.4 and the precompiled pyext was using 2.3, so I kind of downgraded, but you are compiling your own pyext, so that should not be the problem. python is a little bit touchy when you don't pass valid

Re: [PD] Binary - integer conversion

2007-03-18 Thread Martin Peach
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Martin Peach wrote: IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Martin Peach wrote: Also if my string patch is applied to pd, you can use [str drip 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1] to output that sequence one at a time. Since the floats then why the hell do you need

[PD] 0.40-x new features (Was:Re: bandlimited oscillators: set of abstractions)

2007-03-18 Thread Steffen
On 18/03/2007, at 10.21, Roman Haefeli wrote: it's actually quite simple: when instantiating a [send] without an argument, it gets two inlets. the right one can be used to change the sendsymbol. i stumbled across this feature by accident, but it is documented in doc/1.manual/x5.htm . Doh. I

Re: [PD] Compilation of externals on Mac-Intel

2007-03-18 Thread Thomas Grill
Hi Luigi, everything's fine. The ImportError only says that you don't have the numarray extension installed. It's not strictly necessary. greetings, Thomas Am 18.03.2007 um 15:22 schrieb Luigi Rensinghoff: Am 28.12.2006 um 14:26 schrieb Thomas Grill: Hi Luigi, sending you a py/pyext

Re: [PD] Compilation of externals on Mac-Intel

2007-03-18 Thread Thomas Grill
Am 18.03.2007 um 16:33 schrieb Luigi Rensinghoff: only max files right now on the beta-server, right ? no, there are pd_darwin files as well, but they are only built and tested against Python 2.3 which is shipped with OSX. greetings, Thomas -- Thomas Grill http://g.org

Re: [PD] Compilation of externals on Mac-Intel

2007-03-18 Thread Thomas Grill
Hi Luigi, The something is not working here... the pyext object does not build, yet, on startup there is a success- message i don't understand at all. Did you try to build the external object, or are you trying to run a script, or what? That's much too little info. greetings, Thomas

Re: [PD] compiling GEM (cubeArray.cpp: No such file or directory)

2007-03-18 Thread Sciss
maybe the problem is i didn't build GemLibs? there are two folders Gem and GemLibs, in GemLibs README says i should run makeauxlibs, but that can't do anything since the sources seem to be missing. http:// gem.iem.at/download.html#GemLibs says i need to separately download GemLibs for my

Re: [PD] a small utility: dispatcher.pd

2007-03-18 Thread Steffen
On 18/03/2007, at 13.16, Frank Barknecht wrote: [dispatcher] makes building those long [route method1 method2 method3] chains behind abstraction inlets a bit easier and also works around the problem of adding methods later on without breaking existing connections. Very neat. It seams that

[PD] server down

2007-03-18 Thread marius schebella
Hi, having problems to access puredata.info... marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] bandlimited oscillators: set of abstractions

2007-03-18 Thread Derek Holzer
[expr~ $v1 $v2] is expecting a vector for the second number, and in this abstraction it will not be passed from a creation argument. If you wanted to use a creation argument, just use the [expr~] object by itself, i.e.: [expr~ $v1 2.7] or whatever. [expr] and [expr~] don't seem to be able to

Re: [PD] Call for Students: PD projects in Google Summer of Code

2007-03-18 Thread Josh Steiner
damn, sorry to hear about your lay off. thats never good. but i'm *very* excited to hear you applied to do pluggo4pd...if you land this i'd like to try to help you get this done in any way i can, so abuse me as your beta tester, research aide, etc :) -josh Kyle Klipowicz wrote: Ok, I

Re: [PD] a small utility: dispatcher.pd

2007-03-18 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Steffen hat gesagt: // Steffen wrote: On 18/03/2007, at 13.16, Frank Barknecht wrote: [dispatcher] makes building those long [route method1 method2 method3] chains behind abstraction inlets a bit easier and also works around the problem of adding methods later on without breaking

Re: [PD] lowering gem camera capture CPU overhead

2007-03-18 Thread Anders Friberg
Hi Ico, I've run into exactly the same problem. Most probably it is the decoding of the firewire signal that eats the cpu cycles. The dv format (same as firewire) is compressed into a 29 Mbits/sec stream (see e.g. http://www.adamwilt.com/DV-FAQ-tech.html#DVformats) that needs to be unpacked

Re: [PD] compiling GEM (cubeArray.cpp: No such file or directory)

2007-03-18 Thread chris clepper
On 3/18/07, Sciss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok thanks, no i can launch pd! Did you mean 'now I can launch pd'? ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] [PD-dev] developer access ?

2007-03-18 Thread Luigi Rensinghoff
OK well then i wont upload it... its a little bit contradicting, since Frank said.. sourceforege is not for binaries...anyway, i am still waiting for a response from Hans-Christian, maybe then its solved. Otherwise i'll send people interested my gmx-mediacenter link that's the way it is

Re: [PD] compiling GEM (cubeArray.cpp: No such file or directory)

2007-03-18 Thread Sciss
hello, i got the FTGL source code now, could build it and link GEM, so i've got a GEM.pd_darwin, and i place it in my Pd-0.39.2-extended- test7.app/Contents/Resources/extra folder (replace previous one). Now I get this error message when launching PD:

Re: [PD] compiling GEM (cubeArray.cpp: No such file or directory)

2007-03-18 Thread chris clepper
Check that the file GemPixConvertSSE2.cpp in the Base folder is being built. On 3/18/07, Sciss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, i got the FTGL source code now, could build it and link GEM, so i've got a GEM.pd_darwin, and i place it in my Pd-0.39.2-extended- test7.app/Contents/Resources/extra

[PD] create object dynamically

2007-03-18 Thread husk00
Hola list, this is my first post! i would like to know if is possible to create a object dinamically (for example from a list or something like that)? and looking for it in the list and google but i didn't found anything. it would be very cool! thanks Husk

Re: [PD] compiling GEM (cubeArray.cpp: No such file or directory)

2007-03-18 Thread Sciss
ok thanks, no i can launch pd! Am 18.03.2007 um 21:37 schrieb chris clepper: Check that the file GemPixConvertSSE2.cpp in the Base folder is being built. On 3/18/07, Sciss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:hello, i got the FTGL source code now, could build it and link GEM, so i've got a

Re: [PD] GEM / pix objects : limiting colours

2007-03-18 Thread Sciss
p.s. [saturate 1( and [saturate 0( _do_ work with [pix_gain], however not with [pix_offset], so maybe you could just copy the behaviour from pix_gain directly to pix_offset? Am 18.03.2007 um 21:54 schrieb Sciss: i managed to build GEM from the CVS, but the problem is same as before (see

Re: [PD] GEM / pix objects : limiting colours

2007-03-18 Thread Sciss
i found a workaround. if i insert a [pix_rgba] object before [pix_offset], it will work (doesn't work without your fix, so thanks a lot for it!). strangely the alpha channel is the first, followed by red, green, blue, so it's really ARGB not RGBA ... 's fine for me know! ciao, -sciss- Am

Re: [PD] create object dynamically

2007-03-18 Thread Mike Wozniewski
Hi Husk, Download the following list of help patches. They explain how to dynamically create new objects by sending Pd messages to a patch: http://www.puredata.info/community/pdwiki/PdInternalMessages -Mike husk00 wrote: Hola list, this is my first post! i would like to know if is possible

Re: [PD] Binary - integer conversion

2007-03-18 Thread David Powers
On 3/18/07, Steffen Leve Poulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi David I sometimes use constructs like attached patch. Its just a bitmask. Quite effektive for eventfiltering, beatcuts and patterncreation. more xor! Ah this is interesting - and proof that it's really time I learn dynamic