could someone tell me how i can turn off this paranoid setting in pd
that asks me every time if i'm sure i want to close the patch window.
it seems a little crazy that this happens regardless of whether i have
saved the patch or not.
i hope i'm not being intolerant.
thanks.
random question,
just a thought, but do any of you think it would be possible to
build a sysex editor for something like a fs1r with pd ?
i have some software that i can edit it with, but i cant edit
it and play sequences with it at the same time.. its like the
editor has complete control over
On 26/01/2008, naysayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could someone tell me how i can turn off this paranoid setting in pd
that asks me every time if i'm sure i want to close the patch window.
it seems a little crazy that this happens regardless of whether i have
saved the patch or not.
I find
thats fine, i guess if everyone is happy with it, i'll get used to it.
cheers
On 1/26/08, Ypatios Grigoriadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/01/2008, naysayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could someone tell me how i can turn off this paranoid setting in pd
that asks me every time if i'm
Hi folks
Has anybody got Pd running on an Intel mac using the new version of
Jack OSX (0.75)?
cheers
dafydd
--
www.sideshowmedia.ca
skype: chickeninthegrass
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
no, I am not happy with it, either.
would it be possible to make this an option in the pd-settings.
pd-extended doesn't have this behaviour, at least not the old versions.
have not tested the latest.
marius.
naysayer wrote:
thats fine, i guess if everyone is happy with it, i'll get used to it.
On 26/01/2008, naysayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thats fine, i guess if everyone is happy with it, i'll get used to it.
That's the spirit! :-)
ciao
P.S.: The lawyer in my brain insisted on me posting the following comment:
My being funny is absolutely 100% well- intended
--
Ypatios.
1) Think in a live situation, you want to close a sub patch but you
accidentally close the main patch.. DISASTROUS! :-)
Do you actually _have_ to handle closing and opening patcher windows while
doing a live performance ?
I think your setup and/or patch should make that unnecessary (or
On 26/01/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Think in a live situation, you want to close a sub patch but you
accidentally close the main patch.. DISASTROUS! :-)
Do you actually _have_ to handle closing and opening patcher windows while
doing a live performance ?
I think
Hi,
the patch attached gets high exponentially the cpu usage when i decrease a
number box to low values.
any idea? or should keep it in values from 10?
Regards
GARFF
www.myspace.com/vjgarff
_
MSN Noticias
Is there a reason for the third digit? The only possible advantage
for the third digit it that I can imagine right now would be the
ability to cut off previous messages prematurely w/o having to change
the value of previous messages (besides testing my math skills). Am I
missing
[0, 1 1000, 0 500 2000, 7000 6 59000(
|
[vline~]
=
start at zero,
ramp to 1 over a 1000ms period,
ramp down to zero in 500ms, 2000ms after initial bang,
ramp up to 7000 in 6ms, 59000ms after inital bang
nothing gets 'cut off'..the 3rd digit just schedules a delay from initial
I think the question is, why have that book keeping available for
vline~? Are there any practical uses for it?
Otherwise, I don't see why it wouldn't be better to just accept a list
like [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( where it starts at 0, goes to 1 in
1000 seconds, then goes to .5 in 1000
Ahh, okay. RIght, but if you scheduled that last message at 1800
instead of 59000 it would interrupt the full motion of the previous
item. I was looking at these messages from the perspective of classic
envelope generators (for example, the 'time varying' envelopes on the
Roland
Hallo,
Kyle Klipowicz hat gesagt: // Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
I think the question is, why have that book keeping available for
vline~? Are there any practical uses for it?
You can think of the 3-element lists going into vline~ as a stack
ordered by the last element, the delay. So if you send
1
* Timmy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-26 13:05]:
random question,
just a thought, but do any of you think it would be possible to
build a sysex editor for something like a fs1r with pd ?
i have some software that i can edit it with, but i cant edit
it and play sequences with it at the same
* Ypatios Grigoriadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-26 17:08]:
On 26/01/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Think in a live situation, you want to close a sub patch but you
accidentally close the main patch.. DISASTROUS! :-)
Do you actually _have_ to handle closing
1) Think in a live situation, you want to close a sub patch but you
accidentally close the main patch.. DISASTROUS! :-)
Do you actually _have_ to handle closing and opening patcher windows
while
doing a live performance ?
I think your setup and/or patch should make that unnecessary (or
Pd-dev is probably better.
.hc
On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:05 PM, brandon zeeb wrote:
Awesome, thanks for the info. I'll take a look at it this
weekend. Should I forward any subsequent issues on this topic (ie:
Pd on 10.5 and universal binaries) to the pd-dev list, or this one?
I'll let
marius schebella wrote:
no, I am not happy with it, either.
would it be possible to make this an option in the pd-settings.
i would be interested to know what keeps you from using the Ctrl-Shift
versions of the shortcuts if you don't want the annoying dialogs.
for me it seems, like asking for
Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
I think the question is, why have that book keeping available for
vline~? Are there any practical uses for it?
Otherwise, I don't see why it wouldn't be better to just accept a list
like [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( where it starts at 0, goes to 1 in
1000 seconds,
I thought about it again today and I agree, there's no fundamental need to
have it. On the other hand, if you happen to be using lots of vline~s for
scheduling breakpoint envelopes, there might be a big efficiency gain
having the vline~ object manage the timeouts itself. (The vline~ object
would
hi,
livecoding is one of my favorite use of PureData, it's the way I've
had the best fun with it at least,( sigmund~ is quite cool in this
context,) and once the piece is over, it won't be saved, like a mandala.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
23 matches
Mail list logo
